ipl-logo

The Perils Of Indifference Speech Analysis

470 Words2 Pages

Ellie Wiesel’s “ Nobel Peace Prize '' and “The Perils of Indifference” speeches convey the idea of breaking out of the normalization of being a bystander who does not speak out against the world's injustice. Both of Wiesel's speeches express the message of the dangers of remaining indifferent when faced with suffering in the world. Wiesel continues to call attention to how tragedies will continue to occur if individuals do not speak out against them. To illustrate Wiesel’s impression of indifference in his “Nobel Peace Prize” speech he explains how people must talk out against the disasters and how people can not remain quiet anymore. Wiesel conveys this idea when he mentions being aware of this violence and terrosism and how it must not be normalized anymore. Wiesel says, “Violence and terrorism are not the answer. Something must be done about their suffering, and soon”(“Nobel”2). With no action in progress there will not be any …show more content…

But in reality, it's considerably more complex especially when addressing human suffering throughout the world. This is further shown in Wiesel's speech “The Perils Of Indifference” when he further expands the thought of just how easy it is to look away from the ongoing problems but it takes bravery and courage to step up and take action. Wiesel further hypothesizes on how “ Indifference can be tempting — more than that, seductive. It is so much easier to look away from victims' ' (“Perils''2). Walking up to a catastrophe compared to walking away are two very different directions as well as actions. Wiesel clarifies “ in a way, to be indifferent to that suffering is what makes a human being inhuman. Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred. Anger can at times be creative”(“Perils” 2). Showing this anger and hatred can be utilized to speak up for those with no voice and as we’ll be used to making a difference in the

Show More
Related
950 Words | 4 Pages

Wiesel addresses, “As long as one dissident is in prison, our freedom will not be true. As long as one child is hungry, our lives will be filled with anguish and shame”. Ellie Wiesel is conveying that there is always something that can be fixed or there is always someone who can be helped. Moreover Wiesel explains, “What all these victims need above all is to know that they are not alone; that we are not forgetting them, that when their voices are stifled we shall lend them ours, that while their freedom depends on ours, the quality of our freedom depends on theirs”. Elie Wiesel’s central message is that by speaking out for the powerless, an individual can make a great impact and that there are people in the society that depend on the voice of others.

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

Elie Wiesel’s “The Perils of Indifference” uses pathos, loaded words, and rhetorical questions to persuade his audience that one must act when they see injustice, suffering, or unfair treatment. The use of pathos in “The Perils of Indifference” persuades the audience that one must act when they see injustice. “He was finally free, but there

Read More
807 Words | 4 Pages

Through such acts of altruism, Wiesel affirms that humanity is the consideration of others' welfare, as he was resistant and opposed violence especially targeted towards his father to the detriment of his only luxury within the concentration camp. Thus, Wiesel affirms that the preservation of one’s sense of hope and the consideration of other individuals can be a form of defiance against

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

In seeing human beings as less than human beings, individuals were able to treat one another with a lack of dignity and voice. Wiesel 's work reminds us that anytime voice is silenced, dehumanization is the result. This becomes its own end that must be stopped at all

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

Wiesel emphasizes the problem of apathy using pathos and ethos to make his case. Elie Wiesel achieves this in a number of ways by putting the audience and himself on an equal footing, and because of his earlier success, he has credibility even before he starts talking about the idea of indifference. Elie Wiesel urges his audience to take action to fight the indifference in society and between nations. This speech attempts to educate listeners on the speaker's viewpoint on indifference and how societies respond to disasters.audience in his shoes and the shoes of others who have suffered as a result of indifference. Elie Wiesel's life has been marred by tragedy.

Read More
108 Words | 1 Pages

In his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, Elie Wiesel asserts the following: "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.". What Wiesel is saying, is that if we do not help the ones who are being killed, hurt, or mistreated. They will continue to cause pain too those people and will not stop. Unless us as people come to stand up against the evil.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

When the young boy asks, “Who would allow such crimes to be committed? How could the world remain silent”, (paragraph 5) again the audience is prompted to emotionally respond. They have to realize that it was all of them, all of us, who remained silent and that this silence must never happen again. Wiesel demonstrates a strong use of pathos throughout his speech to encourage his audience to commit to never sitting silently by while any human beings are being treated

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

Indifference need to be gain awareness and be stopped. He develops his claim by narrating the dangers of indifference, and how it affected his life then, describes how wrongful it is to be treated in such a way. Finally Wiesel illustrates examples of how indifference affected the world. Wiesel’s purpose is to inform us about the dangers of indifference in order to bring change about it. He establishes a straightforward tone for the president, ambassadors, politicians, and congressmen.

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

Wiesel pinpoints the indifference of humans as the real enemy, causing further suffering and lost to those already in peril. Wiesel commenced the speech with an interesting attention getter: a story about a young Jewish from a small town that was at the end of war liberated from Nazi rule by American soldiers. This young boy was in fact himself. The first-hand experience of cruelty gave him credibility in discussing the dangers of indifference; he was a victim himself.

Read More
855 Words | 4 Pages

The Perils of Indifference Critical Evaluation Essay In the past, indifference has led to the murder of millions of people. Indifference is when we, the humans race, do not care about those who suffer from the injustice, violence, or oppression on behalf of others (Clare). On 12 April 1992, Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor gave a speech regarding human indifference in front of President William J. Clinton and the first lady, Hillary Rodham Clinton, at the White House. What was he trying to accomplish during his speech?

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

Staying silent about global injustice issues does not benefit anyone. One cannot expect to make a difference in the world by simply stating their opinion and continuing their day-to-day schedule. Although it is crucial to exhibit one’s feelings, one cannot change the world by making statements or posing threats against the tormentors. Humanity needs to feel the agonizing pain of every person’s death, no matter which ethnicity, social, or religious group they belong to. A Christian must stand up for a Muslim.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

Elie Wiesel emphasizes throughout "The Perils of Indifference" how choosing to ignore the suffering of others only produces more misery, more prejudice, and more grief—and it also imperils the very humanity of those who choose to do so. Wiesel also noted that in the

Read More
858 Words | 4 Pages

In Shakespeare's writing, Hamlet, he conveys underlying meanings, morals, and lessons through his storyline. He exemplifies the betrayal and changes that his characters experience. Shakespeare gives prime scenarios of this betrayal and personality changes. The themes of Hamlet give insight into the world Shakespeare lived in and the things he may have experienced. Hamlet displays the themes of betrayal, morality, and the value of sanity.

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

Wiesel’s speech shows how he worked to keep the memory of those people alive because he knows that people will continue to be guilty, to be accomplices if they forget. Furthermore, Wiesel knows that keeping the memory of those poor, innocent will avoid the repetition of the atrocity done in the future. The stories and experiences of Wiesel allowed for people to see the true horrors of what occurs when people who keep silence become “accomplices” of those who inflict pain towards humans. To conclude, Wiesel chose to use parallelism in his speech to emphasize the fault people had for keeping silence and allowing the torture of innocent

Read More
916 Words | 4 Pages

Reflective One important factor in the understanding of how learning occurs is reflective practice. The use of reflective is to think carefully about something, by thinking carefully the understanding of individual increases. According to Oxford English Dictionary, 1992, reflective is the action of turning back or fixing the thoughts of some subject, meditation, deep or serious consideration the mode, operation or faculty by which the mind has knowledge on itself and its operations, or by which it deals received from sensation and perception.

Read More

More about The Perils Of Indifference Speech Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document