The Perils Of Indifference Speech Analysis

Ellie Wiesel’s “ Nobel Peace Prize '' and “The Perils of Indifference” speeches convey the idea of breaking out of the normalization of being a bystander who does not speak out against the world's injustice. Both of Wiesel's speeches express the message of the dangers of remaining indifferent when faced with suffering in the world. Wiesel continues to call attention to how tragedies will continue to occur if individuals do not speak out against them. To illustrate Wiesel’s impression of indifference in his “Nobel Peace Prize” speech he explains how people must talk out against the disasters and how people can not remain quiet anymore. Wiesel conveys this idea when he mentions being aware of this violence and terrosism and how it must not be normalized anymore. Wiesel says, “Violence and terrorism are not the answer. Something must be done about their suffering, and soon”(“Nobel”2). With no action in progress there will not be any

But in reality, it's considerably more complex especially when addressing human suffering throughout the world. This is further shown in Wiesel's speech “The Perils Of Indifference” when he further expands the thought of just how easy it is to look away from the ongoing problems but it takes bravery and courage to step up and take action. Wiesel further hypothesizes on how “ Indifference can be tempting — more than that, seductive. It is so much easier to look away from victims' ' (“Perils''2). Walking up to a catastrophe compared to walking away are two very different directions as well as actions. Wiesel clarifies “ in a way, to be indifferent to that suffering is what makes a human being inhuman. Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred. Anger can at times be creative”(“Perils” 2). Showing this anger and hatred can be utilized to speak up for those with no voice and as we’ll be used to making a difference in the