ipl-logo

Social Injustice Rhetorical Analysis

814 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Advantages and disadvantages of diversity in society

Staying silent about global injustice issues does not benefit anyone. One cannot expect to make a difference in the world by simply stating their opinion and continuing their day-to-day schedule. Although it is crucial to exhibit one’s feelings, one cannot change the world by making statements or posing threats against the tormentors. Humanity needs to feel the agonizing pain of every person’s death, no matter which ethnicity, social, or religious group they belong to. A Christian must stand up for a Muslim. A rich person must stand up for a poor person. A white person must stand up for a black person; that is how humanity can make a difference in social justice issues. People need to form opinions and plans to change the issues surrounding …show more content…

For instance, Donne states, “Any man 's death diminishes [him], because [he is] involved in mankind” (4-5). By putting oneself in the shoes of the victim, one can realize their needs and try to bring positivity into their lives. In addition, feelings of empathy can lead to picking the most appropriate side in regards to social injustice. Likewise, Wiesel demonstrates his method for resolving these issues by believing, “[one] must take sides [and that] neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim” (Wiesel 1). Wiesel utilizes logos to highlight the value of taking the most suitable stance without being diplomatic. By picking the most valid side, one can inspire others to be as courageous and create a safe society. Furthermore, choosing a side can lead to one taking action against inequality. However, the most valid act of justice can take more than one human being to accomplish. Similarly, Rusesabagina expresses an alternate way to handle social injustice: letting powerful beings help. Rusesabagina says, “Many of you know influential people abroad, you must call these people” (Hotel Rwanda). Rusesabagina uses logos to focus on the cruciality of resources and alliances with …show more content…

The concerned citizens avoid bringing these issues to the attention of the general public, due to the inappropriate feedback they might receive. Although Wiesel suggests to “pick sides” (Wiesel, 1), everyone has a different preconception of who the victim is. For example, many ethnocentric people create stereotypes about First Nations, but that does not guarantee the validity of their statements. Everyone has diverse opinions about life, religion, and inequality issues. By posing negative opinions, one is increasing the probability of hate and threats against a certain group, such as the First Nations. Before one commits to a “process of reconciliation” (pg 6), one must be certain that their actions will create a valuable change in the world. An act that seems beneficial to one, might be damaging to another. Therefore, mankind needs to have opinions about social inequality which create a healthy and prosperous society. Hence, not only does mankind need to consider making a difference but they also need to make sure that they are making a favourable

Show More
Related
151 Words | 1 Pages

Diction when combined with repetition can be a powerful thing. The use of repetition can be found in this nationalistic statement that is meant to instill the feeling of unity and a sense of comradery in the reader towards these grievance-groups/factions. “And this way to uplift satisfied the grievance-group “experts” because it laid the ground for their sovereignty and permanency: You negotiated with us. You funded us. You shared power, at least a bit of it, with us” (Steele 457).

Read More
156 Words | 1 Pages

Reparations for slavery is the idea that some form of compensatory payment should be made to the descendants of Africans who had been enslaved as part of the Atlantic Slave Trade. With that being said, I don’t believe this essay is a case for reparations. Coates never gives the breakdown of what the United States reparation would look like. He never tells us, his readers, how the system would work, or how anyone would actually make the political case for it. This argument is not about reparations for slavery, either.

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

When the world is engulfed in injustice, it calls for brave men and women to fight back, but the question is how should one fight? Most would resort to violence to kill off injustice, but this leads to even more violence and chaos in most cases than intended. If someone is going to be shot the first reaction is to fight off the killer. However, Cesar Chavez implies in his powerful essay the weakness of violence in a unjust situation and instead the power of nonviolence.

Read More
1072 Words | 5 Pages

He later on directly states the contrast by arguing that “nonviolence has exactly the opposite effect.” His use of strong words like “support,” “conscience” and “justice” when illustrating the idea of nonviolence promotes the value of every human life and helps to attract support for his cause by depicting why it is correct and effective. This moral appeal to the reader helps establish nonviolence as a humane method of effecting long-lasting change in the

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

When no influence is strong enough to unify people, they divide. They struggle” (91). During times of instability, the “influence” that once brought people together is long forgotten, people only look out for themselves. This stimulates the division of like people and as a result, the community struggles. She examines every person around her to make sense of her thoughts and values and to find her place in the world.

Read More
439 Words | 2 Pages

The author expresses cruelty in neutrality and how the bombardment of neutrality all around the world blocks the freedom of the Jews, “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented” (Wiesel). Wiesel tries to persuade the reader to always take sides because neutrality is just as worse as to take the side of the tormentor. He uses strong vocabulary and imagery to conclude his reasons on why no one should ever stay neutral.

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

In his 1986 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, Elie Wiesel strives to inform his audience of the unbelievable atrocities of the Holocaust in order to prevent them from ever again responding to inhumanity and injustice with silence and neutrality. The structure or organization of Wiesel’s speech, his skillful use of the rhetorical appeals of pathos and ethos, combined with powerful rhetorical devices leads his audience to understand that they must never choose silence when they witness injustice. To do so supports the oppressors. Wiesel’s speech is tightly organized and moves the ideas forward effectively. Wiesel begins with humility, stating that he does not have the right to speak for the dead, introducing the framework of his words.

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

Wiesel pinpoints the indifference of humans as the real enemy, causing further suffering and lost to those already in peril. Wiesel commenced the speech with an interesting attention getter: a story about a young Jewish from a small town that was at the end of war liberated from Nazi rule by American soldiers. This young boy was in fact himself. The first-hand experience of cruelty gave him credibility in discussing the dangers of indifference; he was a victim himself.

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

Vaclav Havel wrote his essay “The power of the powerless” as a description and critique of the totalitarian communist government and its system. He states that Communism is different to the other types of dictatorship as it is alike a “secularized religion” rather than the usual dictatorship, which do not have any social of historical background and come to power just by the military power. He also described how the individuals are responsible for getting under the autocratic regime due to their agreement to live in a society of consumers, where the supplier is the government, expecting everyone to go with the strict order of life. In case those individuals decide to participate in that and “live within a lie”, they are bounded with the communism.

Read More
855 Words | 4 Pages

In the speech, titled “The Perils of Indifference,” Elie Wiesel showed gratitude to the American people, President Clinton, and Mrs. Hillary Clinton for the help they brought and apprised the audience about the violent consequences and human suffering due to indifference against humanity (Wiesel). This speech was persuasive. It was also effective because it conveyed to the audience the understanding of

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

But when leaders that seek and aspire change the people will follow and create an unforgettable movement. Racial equality has been an issue in society for centuries, but a change in mind set has put us in the correct direction. Although there are still displays of injustice and inequality, they are certainly less prevalent then before. Our connection with others around us plays a large part in helping us achieve equality and justice, and with large movements around the world, we have begun to change the world for the

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

On December 9, 1948, as the United States was approaching a proposal towards the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which seemed unfair and uncompromised, first lady, Eleanor Roosevelt displayed a motivational and moving speech to allow the citizens of America to come together as one to make the best of the situation that was proposed in front of them. The analysis of the tingling speech on the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, will explore the deep rhetorical devices used to compel the audience and America, including the true purpose and background of this particular eye-opening speech. In paragraph 1, it reads, “Not every man nor every government can have what he wants in a document of this kind. There are of course particular provisions in the Declaration before us with which we are not fully satisfied.”

Read More
808 Words | 4 Pages

From history of hundreds of decades, we have witnessed the great progress made by human, in technology and in society. But injustice always exists everywhere in this world. Injustice and unfair treatment could not be erased from the world easily. Just like the situation described by John Steinbeck, the immigrants faced injustice. But there are too many injustices that even worse in the world.

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

Following the account of how man should seek “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness” (The Declaration of Independence) the writer lets the people know that everyone has the right to overthrow a government if the human rights are unfair and unjust. And

Read More
507 Words | 3 Pages

In order to fully understand this argument, one must contemplate the exemplification which was examined earlier. Essentially, by forfeiting one’s life to a cause, attention surrounding the cause itself begins to build. Naturally, the public will wonder what cause would be worth a life. Consequently, like-minded individuals will stumble upon the cause and join the efforts. The momentum that will have resulted from the act have the ability to facilely surpass long-term efforts.

Read More

More about Social Injustice Rhetorical Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document