The Tragedy of Hamlet describes the progression of indecision beginning with the basic justification of insufficient information to the revelation that he fears what impact his actions will have on his conscience(“SparkNote on Hamlet” SparkNotes). His indecision is driven by his vulnerable narcissism than any concern of right and wrong. Hamlet was more concerned about his feelings in the future than he was about anybody’s feelings in the present. Despite his belief of Claudius’ involvement in King Hamlet's death, Prince Hamlet does nothing due to uncertainty that Claudius truly did kill his father. After returning home from school in Germany, Hamlet attends his father’s funeral only to discover that his uncle not only married his mother …show more content…
Prince Hamlet's inaction is due to the fear of any actions having on him. Hamlet is not certain what he is afraid of but is constantly drawn to indecision that feeds his overwhelming narcissism. Rather than act and seek revenge, Hamlet questions the nobility of any action at all. He is confused on whether to kill Claudius or let him live. This results in no action or indecision. After receiving proof from the ghost of his father that Claudius did kill his father Hamlet questioned whether to take any action and how it would impact his conscience in the future. Rather than take responsibility for the fate of his father and his promise for revenge, Hamlet was more concerned with impact he would have to contend with in the future. Although he had more knowledge then when he first returned home. He justified his inaction by questioning the existence of the ghost of his father. His decision was to use the details that the ghost provided and write a play that would be performed with Claudius in