ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of 9/11

848 Words4 Pages

plan.” On September 11th, 2001, the United States' attention was captured by the selfless acts of a world terrorist who put together an attack that would cause the United States to spiral down to a place never seen before. This act would cause the president, Barack Obama, to create a military operation that would capture the world's attention like never before. The terrorist known as Osama Bin Laden would be the target of a mission that would be unknown to many until this notorious leader of a terrorist group was killed. Once the mission was broadcast, even with the joy of what was done, there were still doubts about whether President Obama had the legal authority to approve and give the way to complete this mission. Questions were raised about …show more content…

Under the Constitution, the President, as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, is the supreme military commander charged with protecting and defending the United States. (Oviedo de Valeria, 1994). Under the constitution, even though it originally stated the Army and the Navy, it does include all branches of the current military branches. If deemed an attack on the United States, he has the authority to get the opinion of the department heads in writing. The President can deploy American forces to areas abroad if the situation is deemed to protect the safety and security of the American people. The Constitution gives the President authority and has high-level officials to tell him the pros and cons of US law and international laws—one of, if not the President's, primary responsibilities is the safety of the USA. There does not seem to be any or many people across the country who believe the President did not have the authority to enact such a plan. Some advocacy groups voiced their displeasure with the name Geronimo being used as the code name for the operation to kill Osama Bin Laden. This displeasure did not go far beyond letting their voice be …show more content…

However, this is only based on any state's territorial or political independence. Article 51 states that nothing in the charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack is against a member of the United Nations. (Nations, n.d.) - "The 'Nations'" The news spread fast through the halls of the military forces. Units were immediately put on notice to be ready for deployment anywhere that was deemed necessary. Most soldiers were prepared, with most not having the question cross their mind if the President had the authority to do so. Many did not even think if other factors would determine whether he had authority. President Obama not only has the legal authority under international law, but you can also add that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) of 2001 also gives the authority. The President can work with Congress to get permission or even authority when major or minor attacks on the United States occur. The Constitution gives the inherent power to the President to use military force without approval or even authorization from Congress for defensive

Show More
Related

The Pros And Cons Of The War Powers Resolution

1152 Words | 5 Pages

The constitution is quite vague and often needs defining. The War Powers act, while primarily insuring collective judgment, also provides a necessary definition for the war powers. The war powers are split between the two, and the only provision directly concerning the matter in Article II of the Constitution is that the president is the commander in chief of the armed forces. What does that entail? If the president could just freely use the troops with no respect for congressional authority, he would never find the need to seek a congressional war declaration, which would be entirely to his advantage and allow him to act unilaterally, which is definitely not how our framers intended our government to work.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The War Powers Act

219 Words | 1 Pages

The War Powers Act does work within the constitutional authority of congress. The act was passed on November seventh 1993. The law is a law that is intended to limit the presidential power usage of the military. It limits the power of the president and makes the president go through congress first before making any major decisions. It is a very controversial topic with the citizens whether think the War Powers act is right or wrong.

Read More

Blood Of Tyrants Summary

1036 Words | 5 Pages

We have fierce debates today concerning war tactics, drone strikes on Americans, torture, military tribunals, citizens’ rights during wartime, and how to reconcile the needs of the national defense with liberty and self-rule. Does the president have a constitutional power to torture foreign enemy combatants? Overrule Congress on war tactics? Deny formal trials to enemies?

Read More

War Powers Reform Research Paper

274 Words | 2 Pages

This limited the president from essentially “declaring” war by deploying troops at their own whim. With the War Powers Resolution the president must notify Congress within forty-eight hours that they have mobilized troops, after which the troops can stay deployed for sixty days without Congress’s authorization. The president is

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Operation Geronimo

2242 Words | 9 Pages

Looking at this topic for a persuasive essay, I am honestly on both sides of the fence here. Even though some would say “yes, president Obama had the legal authority to pursue Operation Geronimo” or vice versa I have come to the conclusion that I support both sides for several reasons. The only reason for my answer to be “no” is because “Operation Geronimo” isn’t a thing. My other reasons supporting “yes” is because of the September 11th attack and because of the actions of the past presidents of the United States as well as the potential future threats against our country. Operation Geronimo

Read More

Pros And Cons Of President Nixon

917 Words | 4 Pages

Rescissions would be put together by the president in an authoritative measure, which must be affirmed by both houses and marked into law before going into effect. The most critical arrangement included the war powers demonstration of 1973, disregarded Nixon 's veto, it gave that the president could utilize the military just compliant with an announcement of war or other congressional approval, to repulse an assault on the United States, its ownership , or its furnished forces.(Pious 2002) The key arrangement of the demonstration was administrative veto over the presidential course of the military. Once the president issued his first report, he would have sixty days in which to utilize the military. Toward the finish of that time, unless congress had approved mainland utilization of the military, the president would

Read More

Compare And Contrast The War Powers Act Of 1973

647 Words | 3 Pages

The questions of whether or not the President has authority to use the military without congress first having declared war has proven to be a great source of conflict throughout history. The confusion comes from the different interpretations of the clauses. Since the Korean War, it has been accepted that the executive powers are that “The president has the power to initiate hostilities without consulting Congress” (libertyclassroom.com). This is often misinterpreted and has been used to expand executive authority and essentially make war without a congressional declaration of war. Perhaps the first example of this misuse of power dates back to the presidency of John Adams.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of George W. Bush's 9/11 Speech

797 Words | 4 Pages

On September 11th, 2001 the Twin Towers in New York City fell victim to a terrorist attack that left thousands dead, thousands more injured and millions in fear. Later that day George W. Bush, the President of the United States of America, created a speech to help calm the public about the events that occurred earlier that day. The speech was shown on national television the United States from the White House. The speech was effective because President Bush did help calm down the public with his speech. In President Bush’s speech to the public on the night of September eleventh 2001 he showed that his point of view was from the perspective that he was trying the comfort the American public.

Read More

How Did George Washington's Impact On Society

854 Words | 4 Pages

Barack Obama sent national troops to eliminate Osama Bin Laden, who was a terrorist. He also established the tradition of the president as a strong, independent leader, with the power of the president to shape the direction of the country. Washington's personality and presidency were important to the development of the United States. He was known for his integrity and humility. His example set a high standard for future presidents and helped to establish a culture of what a president should do that continues to this

Read More

How Did George Bush Show Courage

398 Words | 2 Pages

Bush and the rest of the world would face one of the most devastating days in U.S. history. Terrorists had hijacked four U.S. commercial jetliners targeting New York and Washington, D.C. which three out of the four hit. Bush handled this situation with courage and confidence as he promised the American people that he would do all that he could to prevent another horrific attack. Strategies were formed to resolve the conflict. For a time, there was monitoring international phone calls made by U.S. citizens, and soon Bush administration started seeking to destroy Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations using military forces.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of War Power Resolution

1042 Words | 5 Pages

Many of the people who argue from different perspectives focus on the key words in the constitution to make their arguments stronger. John Yoo contends that declaring war is the mechanism of authorization as it is stated in the constitution. Thus, the president is commander in chief whose purpose is to control the war after the decision is made. He tries to make his argument more clear by showing that Congress is the “sole authority to engage the nation in war” (Yoo).I disagree with Yoo’s argument because being commander in chief of the armed forces is a significant authority; moreover the constitution gives the authority to the president to send soldiers to foreign countries in case there is an urgent situation that may require the armed forces. In addition to that, Turner claims that in the original constitution the term. "to make War" was used which gives essentially all powers related to war beyond the actual command of troops, as had been the case under the Articles of Confederation.

Read More

Declaration Of War Dbq

1044 Words | 5 Pages

Similarly, the President ordinarily enjoys broader authority and initiative in foreign affairs. If Congress can constrain the President's use of his inherent Commander in Chief or foreign affairs powers, it follows that Congress can apply at least as strong constraints to the removal power, an unenumerated, allegedly inherent, domestic power. What this has resulted in is the essential ability of the President to order forces into hostilities to repel invasion or counter an attack, without a formal declaration of war. A declaration of war by the Congress places the Unites States at war, but absent a declaration of war, the President can react to acts of war in an expedient fashion as he sees fit.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of State Of The Union

1024 Words | 5 Pages

Bush used the speech as a reference to Iran, Iraq, and North Korea as the "axis of evil" for the first time. The speech was mostly focused on foreign policy. President Bush unveiled a comprehensive strategy to track out and neutralize terrorists worldwide following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States. The term "Global War on Terror," or "GWOT," was used to refer to the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as additional military, diplomatic, and other measures used to prevent terrorists from receiving funding or safe haven. The GWOT included participation from global coalition partners as well.

Read More

Essay On War Powers Act

479 Words | 2 Pages

The constitution attempts to evenly distribute powers between the executive and legislative branches of the federal government by providing the president or the commander-in-chief the power to control and supervise the military upon approval by congress, who have the power to declare war and to support the armed forces. The subject of debate regarding the act is whether the president has the authority to send military troops to war without congressional approval. The way the war powers act was written makes it difficult to decipher approximately how much power is the president privileged in the war-making process. According to the constitution congress have the powers to authorize war by formally granting letters that verify and confirm the

Read More

Constitutional Convention

697 Words | 3 Pages

Was the Iraq invasion constitutional? The permission for congress to declare war is in Article 1 Section 8 of the constitution (Morone and Kersh 68). The last time that a true declaration of war happened was in 1942 (Franke-Ruta), so congress has declared war since 1941. Although, it was close.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of 9/11

Open Document