ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of 9/11

848 Words4 Pages

plan.” On September 11th, 2001, the United States' attention was captured by the selfless acts of a world terrorist who put together an attack that would cause the United States to spiral down to a place never seen before. This act would cause the president, Barack Obama, to create a military operation that would capture the world's attention like never before. The terrorist known as Osama Bin Laden would be the target of a mission that would be unknown to many until this notorious leader of a terrorist group was killed. Once the mission was broadcast, even with the joy of what was done, there were still doubts about whether President Obama had the legal authority to approve and give the way to complete this mission. Questions were raised about …show more content…

Under the Constitution, the President, as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, is the supreme military commander charged with protecting and defending the United States. (Oviedo de Valeria, 1994). Under the constitution, even though it originally stated the Army and the Navy, it does include all branches of the current military branches. If deemed an attack on the United States, he has the authority to get the opinion of the department heads in writing. The President can deploy American forces to areas abroad if the situation is deemed to protect the safety and security of the American people. The Constitution gives the President authority and has high-level officials to tell him the pros and cons of US law and international laws—one of, if not the President's, primary responsibilities is the safety of the USA. There does not seem to be any or many people across the country who believe the President did not have the authority to enact such a plan. Some advocacy groups voiced their displeasure with the name Geronimo being used as the code name for the operation to kill Osama Bin Laden. This displeasure did not go far beyond letting their voice be …show more content…

However, this is only based on any state's territorial or political independence. Article 51 states that nothing in the charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack is against a member of the United Nations. (Nations, n.d.) - "The 'Nations'" The news spread fast through the halls of the military forces. Units were immediately put on notice to be ready for deployment anywhere that was deemed necessary. Most soldiers were prepared, with most not having the question cross their mind if the President had the authority to do so. Many did not even think if other factors would determine whether he had authority. President Obama not only has the legal authority under international law, but you can also add that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) of 2001 also gives the authority. The President can work with Congress to get permission or even authority when major or minor attacks on the United States occur. The Constitution gives the inherent power to the President to use military force without approval or even authorization from Congress for defensive

Open Document