ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Welfare

920 Words4 Pages

Animal welfare has been a controversial subject in recent years. Nowadays, consumers are placing more attention to their consumption of animal product. The fact that there are diverse consumers with dissimilar perspectives on the meat industry makes animal welfare a complex international public policy controversy that also needs to take economical, scientific, cultural and ethical dimensions into consideration. The government can change the consumption behavior of the consumers and the production process of livestock by intervening the market using a ‘carrot’ approach so that the price system will lead the society to an efficient outcome of animal welfare. Since animal welfare is an increasing concern, numerous countries are reconsidering the way animal welfare is embedded in legislation for housing and care of animals. The Five Freedoms forms the multidisciplinary tools to measure animal welfare (A.J.F. Webster, 2001). However, the Five Freedoms are not implemented in all …show more content…

The existence of different opinions on animal welfare and differentiation in the price of meat play an important factor on consumption behavior of the consumers. The current price system of cheap meat does not lead the market of animal welfare to the optimal level because the harmful environmental effects of livestock production are not reflected in the price of cheap meat. The market of animal welfare will reached its optimal level due to policy implementation by the government. Government intervention shall decrease the social costs of livestock farming and increase the social benefit of animal welfare. Ultimately the solution to animal welfare must be based on a real sense of moral responsibility towards animals. Therefore, existence of sustainable agricultural systems is crucial, not only for our existence, but also for our future

Show More
Related
1434 Words | 6 Pages

The Omnivore’s Dilemma is a non-fiction book that discusses the relationship between the food and our daily life. Michael Pollan, the author of this book, points out the advantages and disadvantages of subsidy on corn. Given the corn is one of the major crops in our daily life, there are lots of corn’s by-products in the supermarket, even the nonfood items. Some people believe corn is a miracle crop because they are impressed by the wide-ranged of corn products; On the other hand, some people think the expansion of corn industry leads to social, environmental, and economic problems. In Pollan’s view, he questions about the outcomes of the subsidy and believes it creates different negative problems to the society.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

He presents a compelling argument for why we have to recall lowering or casting off our intake of animal products, the use of evidence and records to guide his claims. for example, Foer cites the fact that animal agriculture is chargeable for more greenhouse gas emissions than all kinds of transportation combined. via presenting this statistic in a clean and concise manner, Foer makes a robust case for the environmental blessings of lowering our meat consumption. Foer additionally appeals to our sense of morality and values. He emphasizes the significance of compassion and duty in our food choices, encouraging readers to remember the ethical implications of consuming meat.

Read More
269 Words | 2 Pages

For vegetarians, animal rights should trump human rights. In “Utilitarianism, Vegetarianism, and Animal Rights,” Tom Regan defines animal rights as “the natural right to life” (307). Similar to Regan, many vegetarians believe that animals have rights and deserve to have their best interests taken into consideration, regardless of whether they are useful to humans. By switching to a plant-base diet, people will be able to alleviate the needless suffering and deaths of countless animals. Besides, in the same article, Regan also suggests “to treat animals in a more humane manner” (308).

Read More
1302 Words | 6 Pages

Both Pollan and Hurst agree that animals should be a part of our diet, however they disagree on the amount and type of meat people should consume. Pollan believes that people should limit the amount of meat that they eat, and that it should be organic (376). Hurst, on the other hand, believes that animals are free to be eaten, and that industrial farming is the only way to satisfy the increasing population. Both authors are concerned about the welfare of animals, but have opposing beliefs on how their wellbeing should be maintained. Hurst believes that animal should be upheld by the use of industrial farming tools that benefit the animals, such as pig gestational crates.

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

To conclude, the authors argument in this book is that the meat industry is extremely flawed and it needs to be reformed to allow more ranchers, to fix the meat handling to become safer, and to fix the working

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

Animals have always played a pivotal role in societies throughout the past. Some communities praise animals, while others use them as a symbol of wealth, and some sectors own animals merely as companions. Throughout the article “The Case Against Pets” Francione and Charlton (2015) argue that animals must not be property, and consequently need to gain basic animal rights. As law professors at Rutgers University, and publishers of a book about animal rights, the author’s viewpoints and research are held credible. Nevertheless, despite their arguments being supported by validated and reliable evidence, both authors are biased towards their viewpoints.

Read More
193 Words | 1 Pages

Thesis There is a growing consent that factory farming of animals or concentrated animal feeding operations is morally

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

Many people are buying meat which cost them a lot to buy. People should eat good meat as they earned it, not giving them pieces of rat and cow mixed. Why did I give $300,000 to food safety? Factories are producing this meat and factories distribute this meat to states and other countries. The U.S. and parts of the world should end all of this to keep the people.

Read More
464 Words | 2 Pages

Hello everyone, I guess this will be my new group for the rest of the semester. I found this weeks reading assignment rather interesting, it discussed several valuable ideas some I had poundered myself. The author details his idea that “natural selection does not care about the quality of our golden years” meaning that nature only cares about one's ability to reproduce and to raise offspring. As long as they are able to mature without any complications and bring in the next generation, you have successfully contributed to nature.

Read More
1213 Words | 5 Pages

Animal rights and livestock farming Many of us, nowadays, eat and enjoy eating meat but many would agree that this is actually not an ethical action. Michael Pollan, in his persuasive style article “An Animal's Place" published in The New Work Times Magazine, on November 10, 2002 intends to persuade his audience that humans should respect animals and as long as they are treated well in farms and give them a more peaceful life and death it will be fine to eat them. According to Pollan, in today's huge industrial farms, cruel and unbearable things happen that are against animals rights. There is a high possibility that in the future these actions will stop as already some protest for animal rights have begun, because animals have feelings and farms take advantage of them thinking that they are mere machines, making them suffer. The solution to this conflict according to the author who supports friendly farms that respect and give a fun and secure life for animals.

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

In today’s world, there is a division among the people in the world regarding whether or not it is ethical to eat meat. After researching about eating meat and vegetarianism, I have come to the conclusion that it is indeed ethical to eat meat in today’s society. Sure, eating meat might have its drawbacks, but I have found that the benefits of eating meat far outweigh the negatives of eating it. Eating meat not only helps improve people’s health, but it also helps strengthen our economy and it has little difference in the environmental impact that involves in the farming of vegetables. Eating too much of anything usually results in a negative outcome.

Read More
1421 Words | 6 Pages

The meat packing industry disregards animal’s emotions and their rights all together by the malicious treatment of animals. The way animals are being treated is highly unfair. Being slaughtered for their body parts and suffering just to be used for protein or an asset to humans is unbearable. An animal’s life is at equal values to a human and deserve the same rights as

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

Zoos have been around since the eighteenth century. A zoo is defined as a compound where wild animals are kept for viewing and studying. The purpose of a zoo is mainly for education and protection, preserving animal species that are either at a risk of becoming extinct or for increased collection size (Jamieson). Animals from around the world have been enclosed in an area where we can admire and study these fine creatures. However, many modern zoos around the world have introduced animal shows, petting and feeding sessions to attract more visitors in order to earn more money.

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

Promoting good animal welfare as part of food quality Animal welfare is very important also for us humans, for our own health, nutrition and security when eating animals. Many times you can diagnose animal welfare when studying their behavior, physiology productivity and reproductive success. Sometimes productivity is a way to know the animal’s health.

Read More
748 Words | 3 Pages

In the United States, people have all been wondering is it ethical to eat meat. Eating meat can be very harmful, because it can cause a lot of diseases like Heart disease and other ones. You should not have to kill animals for food because animals are kind of like people. Some more reasons that you should not eat animals, is because eating too much meat can be harmful to the human body, We could just eat plants and other things, and killing animals can be bad so that is why we should not eat animals.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Animal Welfare

Related Topics

Open Document