Retrieved April 25, 2016, from http://www.historynet.com/why-the-south-lost-the-civil-war There was no specific author to this article; it was a collection of many historian 's opinions of Jefferson Davis and the outcome of the Civil War. It was a collection of pieces on why the South lost the war. I used the pieces that specifically named Davis as examples of some of the mishaps and bad decisions that were made during the war. This is different than the other pieces because it gives many different opinions on why the south
In conclusion, the secession of the eleven states was not very successful. As we know today, there are fifty states in America, one of which is Texas. There were many outcomes to this decision, and not all benefited Texas. When the Civil War ended the North came out as the victor. After this the North set forth many plans to allow Texas back into the Union, however some were too easy and others too difficult for the South to accept.
Under influence of president Andrew Jackson, the congress was urged in 1830 to pass the Indian Removal Act, with the goal of relocated many Native Americans in the East territory, the west of Mississippi river. The Trail of tears was made for the interest of the minorities. Indeed, if president Jackson wished to relocate the Native Americans, it was because he wanted to take advantage of the gold he found on their land. Then, even though the Cherokee won their case in front the supreme court, the president and congress pushed them out(Darrenkamp).
Despite their disadvantages, eighteen counties in Texas had voted against seceding, but it did not matter in the end. Some people, such as Judge E.J. Davis, refused to swear an oath of loyalty to the confederacy and started a Texas U.S. cavalry to fight against it. During the war many Texans were unhappy with the Conscription Acts of 1862 because they exempted slave owners of 20 or more slaves from Confederative service. After the war was over there was still a lot of discord among Texans. Some were angry at the men that did not fight for the Confederacy and others were angry at those who fought against the Union.
The Civil war had not only done that, but had ended the decision of having withdrawal of membership in a federal union/alliances with others. At the time, citizens thought that the states have the right and are able to leave the union anytime
The Union believed that both the Confederacy and Union had to agree before the Confederacy could secede, due to the binding Constitution. Although, the North violated the agreement which would give the South full permission to leave the Union. In the Constitution, it states, “No person held to service or labor in one state… be discharged from service or labor, but shall be delivered up, on claim of the [person] to whom such service or labor may be due… [The North States] have enacted laws, which [nullifies] the Act of Congress … Thus the constituted compact has been deliberately broken… ,” (Document E).
South Carolina was the first to withdraw from the Union. The state of South Carolina did not want to be part of nation that had no control. Then other southern states such as, Mississippi, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Texas, and Louisiana left the Union. As a result they established the Confederate States of America, which was an independent southern slave republic. Lower and South and Upper South had to go to war to decide whether what side to pick.
The South’s choice of leaving the Union was an offensive act rather than a defensive one. In 1860 the
The South seceded because of slavery, political power, the differences in their way of life. Slavery was a major issue here in America. The South wanted slavery and the North didn’t. “Government cannot endure half slave, half free” (Doc 5).
Toombs believes that the South has the right to secede from the union. Toombs makes it clear in his speech that the Confederate states are pro slavery and the Union States are against slavery. In his speech Toombs states that “In 1820, the Northern party, endeavored to exclude the State of Missouri from admission into the Union, because she chose to protect African slavery in the new state.” When Toombs states this he is telling the people that the North made a bad decision when it came to Missouri wanting to be a part of the Union over slavery beliefs. Toombs also states in his speech that “Another one of our guarantees of the Constitution was, that fugitives from justice, committing crimes in one state and fleeing to another, should be delivered up by the State into which they might flee to the authorities of the State from whence they fled and where the crime was committed.”
As the tensions between the North and the South keep growing, we have to look at the secession of the Southern states and if this act will help or hinder the debate brought about between the two territories. One of the first things we need to inspect is the differences between the two. Then we need to get down to the core and see why there are major issues between the North and the South. Finally, after we go through the facts, I will present my opinion on whether or not secession is necessary and if it is or isn’t the right route to take in order to resolve the conflicts separating the United States.
“By use of their power in the federal government have striven to deprive us of an equal enjoyment of the common territories of the republic.” (Declaration). Some states claimed to stay attached to the union in hopes that something would change but since they hadn’t that they would as well secede. “This hostile policy of our Confederates has been pursued with every circumstance of aggravation which could arouse the passions and excite the hatred of our people.”
The argument boils down to the fact that the South would rather “make war...then let the Union survive” however, the North was willing to “accept war rather than let it perish” showing us that the South was fighting for the money while the North was fighting for the idea and the hope that the Founding Fathers have planted.
Secessionists then grew to acknowledge that in order for secession to become successful, ties to any political parties or the political process would have to be severed as Lawrence M. Keitt said, “Loyalty to the party is treason to the South” . However the Upper South; Tennessee, North Carolina, Arkansas, Virginia and Missouri; felt that they had stronger ties to the union than to secession which is why the Upper South had never really shown any support to secession. Republicans also played a huge role in orchestrating the secession between the North and the
After all the arguing, the ratification process was in full force. The responsive argument, according to Vandercoy, widely made was that Congress might be able to confine the existing militia force, all armed citizens, to a select militia made up of a small segment of the population. The delegates were trying to eliminate the possibility that game laws, used effectively in England at different points to disarm the population, would not produce a similar result in America. He summarizes the state ratification process; three states ratified while expressing their understanding that the people had a right to bear arms, and two states refused to ratify until individual rights were recognized as amendments.
