ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Banning Books

428 Words2 Pages
Do some books contain things that children should not be able to read? A lot of books are banned every year. Banning books protects children from inappropriate material. However, not banning books helps children prepare for real-world experiences. Teachers and parents cannot ban books, because they don’t have the right to, and books help children understand the world better. First, parents and teachers don’t have the right to control what books children can read. According to procon.org, “In the 1982 Supreme Court ruling on Board of Education v. Pico, Justice Brennan wrote that taking books off of library shelves could violate students' First Amendment rights, adding that ‘Local school boards may not remove books from school libraries
Show More
Related
652 Words | 3 Pages

Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.

Read More
1400 Words | 6 Pages

Books can show kids the struggles of real people and can teach them empathy and sympathy for these people. When you take away these books children have a narrow view on life and won’t be able to look through other people’s perspectives. In the article, ‘The Negative Effects of Book Banning in the Classroom’, the author, Chiesa says, “When individuals restrict their children from reading certain books, they can't enforce those beliefs onto other children and families. Banning books has the potential to create gaps in knowledge for young learners.” Children will learn less if they are restricted from reading certain books and these restrictions can also affect children in the same classroom.

Read More
376 Words | 2 Pages

Banning books discourages the freedom of thought. Books are one of the main sources of learning. A few authors believe their books are being targeted. For example, black authors' books are being challenged because some contain racial history and a few parents believe those books

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Legally, people have no jurisdiction over what or what cannot be available to the public. In other words, it is most certainly illegal to physically take a book away from a place or by any other means, obviously, other than in court. While in actuality, social pressure is an easy way to exploit groups into complying with specific actions. “Censorship” Compton’s by Britannica reads,” people opposed to certain books have attempted to prevent them from being read by removing them from school reading lists and persuading librarians not to buy the books and booksellers not to stock them.” In any sense, since books/texts are a form of speech, they are protected by the first amendment making banning them or any sort of censoring impossible due to such books/texts being protected; At least, that’s how it should be enforced according to the law.

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

“Let readers be leaders” is the motto of Martha Hickinson, a school librarian who after hearing completely compelling and false statements about books at a school board meeting rallied and gathered around four hundred other people against the ban to speak out. There were speeches by adults and even students, and the fight dragged on where Hickinson received an immense amount of hate but in the end, the book was restored. This is a demonstration of how one person can change a lot. Overall, book banning is an ongoing issue happening right now. It is not only happening in schools, but at a national level.

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

It denies individuals of finding out about their general surroundings. Books should not be banned because of what they appear to be. For instance, restricting books are unlawful and not valuable for schools. '' I don't think a school board can wrap its political concerns in the cloak of educational suitability,'' Mr. Levine said (“Book-Banning Arguments are heard ”). The statement is vital in light of the fact that it gives

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

Some books are being taken off shelves because people think that there inappropriate for kids that are 18 or under should not be read or should not be made at all. But other parents think that there is no issue and that is okay because those parents think that the books that are being banned should not be banned because they help people learn more about what their reading about. Both sides have clear evidence. Many parents believe they have the right

Read More
880 Words | 4 Pages

[21]” (ProCon.org). Banning books in school can create a problem for the teachers that are trying to assign something to the class. With the new addition to the first amendment schools will have the rights to any books. When books are banned the life lessons in the books are also

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.

Read More
1174 Words | 5 Pages

In some cases books were banned from schools because parents believed there kids should not be opened to certain topic in the stories. Another issue is students have been sent home to read books for certain classes that talk about touchy subjects. For example, religion and magic. Parents

Read More
609 Words | 3 Pages

At one point in time, over 7,220 books have been challenged to be banned. Though these books have been removed for the safety of children, not all books should be banned for many reasons. These include the fact that banning books is infringing on the First Amendment, keeping children from understanding the real world, and, even though there are many reasons for book banning, not banning books could help a student’s education and can even work against itself. Banning a book from a school or public library could go against a person’s First Amendment of the freedom of press.

Read More
472 Words | 2 Pages

1.) Books can be amongst some of the best teachers. Furthermore books teach us many things like new vocabulary and new ways of thinking, so we should embrace all books and not ban them. 2.) Additionally, most banned books go on to become classics.

Read More
1107 Words | 5 Pages

There are both pros and cons to banning book in school. According to ProCon.org, “Parents have the right to decide what material their children are exposed to and when.” Parents have the right to ban books so they can protect their children from violent content. Children need to be protect from content that could scar them. ProCon.org also states that “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics in school or public libraries.”

Read More
1617 Words | 7 Pages

First, this text states, “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics” (Procon.org). To explain, parents are banning books from schools because they do not want their children to be exposed to these inappropriate topics. Moreover, banning these inappropriate topic books would be a great deal for parents and their children. Furthermore, the same text states that “Keeping books with an inappropriate content out of libraries protects kids, but does not stop people from

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Banning Books

Related Topics

Open Document