Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits of big game hunting
Benefits of big game hunting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Societies and cultures such as our own can only advance if we learn from previous mistakes, in this case I am talking about extinct species of wildlife. In the past, people have killed a lot of animals in large numbers as they deemed fit for things that include a stable food source, resource, and to affect other peoples as with the bison. Bolen and Robinson made excellent points on this issue about how Americans waged war on Bison as an attempt to take away the Indian’s food source and how that is why the mighty bison is so scarce today (Bolen and Robinson 10). The bison and other examples in the text are great examples of Europeans overkilling and driving species of animals to extinction for various reasons, but it is very important. If we
Pros: 1.A large portion of the hunting fund is zoned for wildlife conservation and research institutions to maintain their work. While hunting, it also contributed to economic development and wildlife conservation. Evidences: In the United States, there is a large number of forest managers who monitors in hunting practices, whose funding is the cost of hunting licences. Data shows that in the United States Montana State, wildlife protection funding of 90% from the sale of hunting license proceeds (Jian,2016) According to Montana Hunter’ Ed courses, “hunters provide almost $86 million a year for conservation through this tax—over $2 billion since 1937! It is the single biggest source of money collected nationally for wildlife.”
Theodore Roosevelt said “speak softly and carry a big stick” some people have no idea what he means by this quote, We never thought wolves would become as much of a problem until now. I believe the wolf population is happening right under our noses and we don't even know it yet. Even though the wolf numbers might not recover, wolves should be hunted because wolves are killing large numbers of deer and livestock and wolves are endangering humans and farmers. Many people believe that the wolf population will not recover if the humans continue to hunt them,or increase our hunting on them. ”The latest population survey results estimate that 470 wolf packs lived in Minnesota's wolf range this past winter, 212 more wolves than estimated on the survey conducted in winter 2013”.(DNR).The wolf population is increasing when people are worried that it won't be able to recover from hunting and that they should be endangered.
Persuasive Argumentative Speech Outline (Motivated Sequence Organization) Wild Game Hunting General Purpose: To persuade Specific Purpose: To persuade the audience that hunting is a good thing for the environment and people. Thesis: Hunting is valuable when controlling overpopulation, providing food, and contributing to conservation efforts. Almost everyone knows someone who takes advantage of hunting season.
In the long run, killing these animals will only result in endangerment of the species. I don’t see the wrong with hunting for food and/or hunting for survival. However, hunting to control population or simply for bragging rights, is what I considered
3. Synopsis: This article focuses on whether trophy hunting is necessary to the conservation efforts and if it should be continued. It concludes that trophy hunting provides valuable economic support for conservation efforts and meat to the locals that ecotourism alone could not do. It believes that both trophy hunting and the jobs provided from ecotourism are important aspects and incentives to keep conservation active.
Pro-Hunting Argument To hunt or not to hunt, many see it as a negative and its being cruel to animals. Other think if humans keep hunting, animals are going to go extinct. But what many don’t know is how much hunting helps animals and the conservation of animals. People that don’t know what really is going on they always head toward the negative. I’m Going to explain how hunting helps wildlife and how Hunting permits are good because they help maintain animal conservation.
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Wild Lands Policy regulated and run by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) are two different government actions taken to ensure the safety and preservation of plants, animals and the environment they live in. These policies should not be controversial but making everyone happy is an impossible job especially when the federal government is involved. Environmentalist and Citizens who feel the government is overreaching both have their positions and both are unwilling to budge. The Endangered Species Act was passed in 1973 and since then it has done exactly what it was designed to do, saves plants and animals that are on the verge of extinction.
In the article ¨ 6 Endangered Animals Poachers Are Hunting Into Extinction,¨ Jessica Phelan describes how the killing of Cecil the Lion decreased the tourism in Zimbabwe due to the hunting. This is just one example of poachers interfering with human life. If more of this continues, humans will be the only living thing on Earth. For elephants, laws have been passed to protect the ivory in their tusks that everyone wants to get hands on. In 2011, one in every 12 African elephants were killed (Phelan).
Fencing game animals results in unnatural genetics with animals unable to move freely. Providing easy game on farms lulls hunters into thinking all is well and wild habitat doesn’t need to be protected, defended, or enhanced. Game farms ignore less popular species and no one has the right to pen any wild species. Conditions on breeding farms are inhumane. Trophy hunting encourages “canned hunting” where animals are raised in captivity to be shot.
Hunting is a controversial topic in today’s society. Some people agree hunting is good for conservation and family bonding, while others disagree saying it is inhumane. Some people believe that commercial hunting should be banned. Others say that it is good for animals to die, where they will not overpopulate. Hunting and hunters are the major resources for conservation.
Why did Lieutenant Jimmy Cross accept the blame for Ted Lavender 's death? He was the First Lieutenant and it was his responsibility to keep his unit safe. It also showed that Jimmy Cross was becoming a man.
In addition, the detrimental wildlife issues that would emerge if hunting were no longer an option to keep animal populations under control would increase significantly. The idea of keeping hunting alive is crucial to keep our wildlife safe. Hunting may not apply to all people in the world, but it has to be done. In today’s world there is no other possible way to manage our wildlife in such an effective manner as we do it now. What people need to realize and accept is the fact that hunting does not harm the animals as severely as leaving them to overpopulate does.
Poaching and illegal hunting can cause an off set in the ecosystem by overhunting animals. When one animal population decline drastically, other organisms are affected too. The decline in native predators is the main cause for overpopulation of animals like deer. Deer overpopulation has led to rapid decrease vegetation life causing other animals to be put at risk. Removing predators from the food web disrupts the entire balance of an
Wildlife Conservation is often seen as a bad thing, but if you look at it from my perspective, then it is actually a good thing. People think of it as holding wild animals captive, but we are actually protecting them from poachers. The purpose of Wildlife Conservation is to protect the animals in danger, which I am in agreement 110%. Other people argue that we shouldn’t have conservations, but they don’t know the harm that can happen to unprotected animals.