ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Chief Executive Compensation For Employees

1834 Words8 Pages

Celebrities and famous athletes are not the only ones that make millions of dollars each year. Chief Executive Officers (CEOs), the professionals in charge of running businesses, are making just as much, if not more. Fifty-eight CEOs of public companies in the U.S. made more than $20 million in 2006 (Manzi 1). According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were 20,620 chief executives employed in the United States in May 2015 (“May” 2). Although CEO pay has increased drastically in the past few decades, the same cannot be said for their employees. CEO pay increased by over 725% between 1987 and 2011, which is enormously greater than the 5.7% growth for workers (Nolan 2). This disparity between executive and employee compensation has gained …show more content…

Executive compensation is shaped by market forces that push towards maximizing value, but they are also shaped by managerial influence which detracts from this outcome (Bebchuk and Fried 73). According to a 1999 article in the Journal of Accounting and Economics by Rachel M. Hayes and Scott Schaefer, compensation is determined by the bargaining powers of contracting parties (Olubunmi et al. 2). Executives earn more if they have a strong bargaining position compared to the board, which occurs when the company is outperforming others or the operations are large, risky, and complicated (6-7). If the workforce is highly skilled, unionized, and irreplaceable, then the pay ratio between executives and employees is lower because they have more strength when negotiating with management …show more content…

CEO pay will be higher and less sensitive to performance when executives have more power (Bebchuk and Fried 77). “Corporate governance mechanisms such as board compensation (% of outside directors), the job split between CEO and chairman (i.e., CEO duality), the proportion of internal director shareholding, and the relative concentration of external shareholding” are believed to influence the process that corporate boards use to set CEO pay (Cordeiro and Veliyath 2). Increasing outside directors on boards allows for them to evaluate, monitor, and replace managers properly (2). CEO pay will be dispositionally high compared to the firm’s performance and the external labor market if a board has more inside directors (2). If an individual is a CEO and also the Chair of the Board of Directors, then they will have more control over their compensation by appointing sympathetic directors and choosing the information that the board reviews (2). If these position are separated, then the Chair is more likely to be more diligent and fair when choosing CEO pay (2). Less compensation is needed to convince the CEO to make the stock value as high as possible if they also are a stockholder in the firm (3). Blockholders, shareholders that own more than 5% of outstanding shares, are more likely financially and legally obligated to discipline managers and directors, which would negatively impact CEO pay (3). If a company

Show More
Related
327 Words | 2 Pages

Cowherd, Douglas M., and David Levine I. "Product Quality and Pay Equity between Lower-level Employees and Top Management: An Investigation of Distributive Justice Theory. " Administrative Science Quarterly 37.2 (1992): 302-20. Business Source Premier. Web.

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

Reading Assignment #6 1. In order to keep top performers satisfied and productive, Steve Bates argues, there should be a substantial difference in the variable pay or merit- based salary increases that top performers and poor performers receive. Based on available research the increase needed to catch “anybody’s attention” should be a seven percent or eight percent increase in compensation. It also states that anything below that might be welcomed, but will not lead to substantially greater effort on the part of employees to increase business results.

Read More
460 Words | 2 Pages

Over his past days of his life merits the title of the “Wealthiest person known in recent history” also, according to the percentage of the United States’ GDP (Gross Domestic Product). It is believed that no other wealthier people of America including Bill Gates or Sam Walton would have come close to that of

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

Jay Gould, a robber baron, drove competitors to the ground, paid poor wages, and forced employees to work under dangerous conditions. Mark Zuckerberg, a captain of industry, raises productivity, expands more markets, and creates more jobs. Their individual philosophies of wealth influenced Gould and continue to influence Zuckerberg. While Gould was able to corrupt public officials and persuade them to interpret laws in his favor, it is challenging for millionaires of today to successfully do that. As time has gone on, it has become a lot more challenging to manipulate the system due to laws put in place, such as minimum wage laws and the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Read More
1163 Words | 5 Pages

Not even the wealthiest oil tycoon or the sharpest Silicon Valley CEOs are capable of such a number. [To even begin to understand how John Davison Rockefeller amassed his fortune, it is critical to observe the period of time in which Rockefeller was alive.] Rockefeller was twentyfive years old in 1855. He was young, and was surly in his prime. And at the same moment, the world was experiencing the rapid change of industrial growth.

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

The desert view is that the CEO gets what he deserves as evaluated by his performance (Moriarty 267). The third potential view is the utility view and it defines a just wage as one that is give en attract, retain, and especially motivate the CEO so they may maximize the firm’s wealth (Moriarty 268). If any of these views are valid, then he claims it follows that CEOs are paid too much (Moriarty 272). Although Moriarty does make some valid points, I do not agree with all that he states.

Read More
425 Words | 2 Pages

Most people would agree that income should be based on education and experience. However, this formula applies to minimum wage workers as well as to the CEO of a large

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

The equitable employee salary announcement seemed like another step toward achieving Price’s goals as a business

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

“Cristiano Ronaldo makes $56 million a year, Kobe Bryant made $250 million a year and Barack Obama made $400,000 a year during his presidency...” (O'Connor ). Professional athletes are paid millions of dollars to play a game while police officers, firefighters, army soldiers, and even the president are paid significantly less. “It’s not shocking that public servants like teachers and police officers make less than professional athletes”(Figueroa). Compensation shouldn't be about entertainment, it should be about job importance because people are trying to make the world a better and safer place not a more entertaining place.

Read More
1318 Words | 6 Pages

Along with parallels in the rise of technology, the sensationalism in media, and the economic consequences of the two it is my belief that we have entered into a second gilded age. Today we can see our economic situation becoming more and more “gilded”, that is on the outside there is grand technological, medical, and societal progress, however, looking deeper, we can find a darker underbelly of our social and political reality. As in the gilded age, the focus of concern is a disparity of power and wealth. According to Forbes (Adams) only 18% of people trust business leaders to do the right thing and only 15% trust business leaders to tell the truth. These statistics shows a great divide between those who have power in today’s society and their reputation as honest and hardworking people.

Read More
2411 Words | 10 Pages

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Executive compensation is a broad term which comprises of financial compensation and non-financial rewards given to an executive from their firm for their services. This package is decided by a company’s Board of Directors (consisting of independent directors). It should be designed in a manner which incentivizes the executives and motivates them to perform in accordance with the company’s goals and its long term growth. These packages generally include a mix of short-term incentives (including salary, annual bonus, benefits, and perquisites) and long-term incentives (including stock options and restricted shares). E.g. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella received a compensation package of $84.3 million for the software maker’s

Read More
1015 Words | 5 Pages

Are actors and professional athletes overpaid? The film industry and professional sports are regarded to be the most profitable business sector in the present scenario. The professional artists and film actors earn millions of dollars due to their talent.many people might have had a dream to be popular and earn more like they do. Despite the fact that their profession is not an easy job that could be done by common people, they are more prone to criticism resulting from their overpaid work. However, the perception on whether the professional artists and actors are overpaid or not is still a matter of concern of a majority of people.

Read More
1421 Words | 6 Pages

Decisions pertaining the Directors remuneration are taken by the Remuneration Committee. A study by Solomon and Solomon (2004) declares that the need for an independent remuneration committee has been highlighted in the academic literature as a mechanism to prevent executives writing and signing their own pay

Read More
1738 Words | 7 Pages

• Global pay system: All managers worldwide receive the same wage. Equality in the amount of work and pay. • They don’t focus on chasing trends. They keep it simple and affordable for all. II.

Read More
919 Words | 4 Pages

Furthermore, in the last decade, an increasing number of major shareholders attempt to influence corporate behaviour by using their equity stakes in organisation to pressure the management for improved performance and increase the value of their investments. However, shareholder activism is believed to be very controversial. Some proponents of shareholder activism believe that the involvement of shareholders in the management of the company ensures that the invested capital is spend properly and that the directors do grant themselves excessive remuneration packages and focus mainly on maximisation of shareholder value. Opponents, on the other hand, often criticise a high degree of shareholder activism as they considered that active investors are mainly focused on their own short-term benefits and profits and not on the long term aims and goals of organisations (Corkery,

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Chief Executive Compensation For Employees

Related Topics

Open Document