ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Drone Strikes

920 Words4 Pages

United States has been using for a while drone campaign as a counterterrorism program in order to kill the Islamic state leaders in Syria. This at time has raised different conflict between countries. Thus, should US continue with drone strikes as part of targeted killing program or should this activity be stopped?
________________________________________
….
Why should United States continue with the drone campaign as part of counterterrorism program?
Drone strikes reduce the risks of civilian casualties:
United States has been using drone campaign for a while as a counterterrorism program in order to kill the Islamic state leaders in Syria. As it is known, the first US drone attack happened during this year on August, 3. This drone was launched …show more content…

This is because drones function remotely by pilots launched from the bases in countries who cooperate with one another. So, drones do not require pilots to control them, which reduces percentage of deaths and damages that would happen if instead of drones were used airplane pilots or ground soldiers. Sometimes terrorist organizations are located in very dangerous places to make it hard for Special Forces to catch them.
Drone strikes cost less than military intervention:
Some critics say that drone strikes are not as expensive as the ground programs that are used in military interventions. In the year of 2012 were only 5 billion dollars used for drones, which makes only one percent of the total annual military budget. Contrary to the cost allocated for drones, manned military attack in United States needs 18,000 to 169,000 dollars per hour in order to function. This amount is forty-two times more than the amount that is used for a drone attack.
Why should United States stop the drone campaign as part of the counterterrorism program?
Drone strikes increases the creation of terrorist instead of killing

Show More
Related
669 Words | 3 Pages

This paper analyzes an article discussing the ethics and morality of drone operations by the U.S. government. The article “Is Obama’s Drone War Moral?” by Matt Peterson provides the argument and basis for this analysis. This paper will break down the strengths and weaknesses of the arguments written in the article. This article uses both deductive and inductive arguments as well as fallacies.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

Drones look like little remote control helicopters but with cameras in them. Some people fly these just for fun, but sometimes they can be used in the military. However, they have been seen to be becoming an invasion of privacy. Recently, there was a Kentucky man who shot down a drone that was hovering over the houses in his neighborhoods. In an article, he was asked and interviewed about the situation and said, “...To me, it was the same as trespassing”(Hawkins).

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

safer by decimating terrorist networks across the world. Drones kill fewer civilians, as a percentage of total fatalities, than any other military weapon. Drone strikes are legal under international law. These are all points that get one thinking that drones are okay, but little do they know that there are thousands of innocent lives being killed by strikes that weren’t even supposed to be attacking them. The voters for using drones don’t fully know what’s on the other side of using them, if we use them this will trigger many people, victims of ones who got hit on accident and more.

Read More
1913 Words | 8 Pages

The argument defending the U.S. drone program as a legal instrument is centered on the claims found in jus in bello. There are two relevant aspects of war laws, distinction and proportionality. Both principles are developed in the just war tradition, offering a philosophic and ethical guideline for the goals and conducts of war. The principle of distinction prohibits direct attacks on the civilian population; forcing the attacker to differentiate between those directly between hostiles and civilians. […] the definition of collateral damage deserves attention in the context of the distinction principle.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

The US has converted the entire world into a battlefield where drone attacks can be directed at individuals anywhere anytime (Benjamin, 2012). Drones could satisfy the rules of international humanitarian law, if launched against a well-known military target, to advance military objectives, not harm civilians to a degree disproportionate to the military objective sought, and if the drone attack would not cause unnecessary suffering. Such a drone attack could comply with the rules of International humanitarian

Read More
1271 Words | 6 Pages

The official U.S. counterterrorism strategy identifies a number a goals, one of which involves eliminating safe havens for terrorist actors. In order to accomplish this, building partnerships with governments like Pakistan and Yeman is essential. However, drones strikes subject local governments to incredible political pressure, and increase anti-American sentiment, which makes cooperation with the United States much harder to achieve. Furthermore, they can fuel insurgency groups and undermine the social fabric needed for a government to function. All of this serves as a powerful sign of countries subservience to the United States, undermining their

Read More
1162 Words | 5 Pages

A rising contempt for America makes it easier for terrorists to find new recruits to use against American armies. In fact, Stern says, “The use of drones to target suspected al Qaeda operatives in Yemen has been correlated with a rapid growth in membership in the group’s Yemen-based affiliate” (“Obama And Terrorism”, 3). The use of drones mainly end with a continuous circle of death and

Read More
757 Words | 4 Pages

According to Spencer Ackerman, the Council of foreign relations has counted 3,674 deaths as result of 500 drone strikes outside of Iraq and Afghanistan ( The Guardian, 2014). Most of these deaths were civilian casualties and can be viewed as “collateral” damage but it begs the question if drones are really as effective as they are proclaimed to be by their protagonists. Drones will not always hit their target and given a couple chances they will miss at times. The effect of them missing can result in massive civilian casualties. Drone warfare has come under protest due to statistics similar to those mentioned

Read More
1735 Words | 7 Pages

This person is far from harm’s way, and in fact may have never seen anyone that they are attempting to take the lives of anywhere else than a screen a few short inches from their faces. Drone strike have been increasing popular in the past eight years under the Obama administration especially. Upon election, in fact three days after initial inauguration, President Obama increased the CIA’s drone program, drastically enlarging the frequency of offensive drone strikes overseas. 2009 alone saw fifty-three reported strikes, which is more than the total reported amount during the entire Bush administration (Ofek). Hundreds of drones are used worldwide today, with a majority of the ones utilized in the Middle East based out of a secret base somewhere in Pakistan.

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

With the current advances in technology, protection is more important than ever. Terrorists no longer need to be in a certain place to undermine Americans’ feelings of safety. As the recent cyberattacks on Equifax and voting equipment prove, we must meet cyberterrorism with cybersecurity. Many new developments allow this, such as drones and more specified Internet monitoring. NPR employee Eyder Peralta notes that the CIA and the NSA work together on drone attacks on suspected terrorists.

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

In addition to human rights violations and the decrease of actionable intelligence, targeted killing can increase the amount of recruits due to increasing the hatred for the United States. Additionally, targeted killings are not supported by the majority of other nations and therefore results in an unfavorable public opinion of the United States. Lastly, although using a small number of special operations operatives reduces the amount of potential U.S. casualties, targeted killings carried out in this manner are extremely risky and

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

On average more than 1 innocent civilian is in killed in every drone strike. When Barrack Obama first came to power there was a wave of optimism that America would take a more diplomatic and humanitarian approach to the on-going disputes in the Middle East. Indeed, he was even awarded a Nobel Peace Prize in his first year in office. However he had blood on his hands after being President for just 3 days, it was his first drone strike and killed at least 9 innocent civilians, most of these were all from one family. Another incident was Din Mohammad, who had the misfortune of neighbouring militants reported to be part of the Haggani Network, who are fighting against the United States in Afghanistan in Danda Darpakhel, North

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

This, along with the pros and cons of drones I will discuss in this essay plus some possible uses for drones in the future. The United States had made many allies all over the world throughout the country’s history, especially after the Second World War. However, one cannot make a lot of friends without making a few enemies, some of the enemies the US has made includes terrorist organisations like Al-Qaeda, and The Taliban referred to in daily speech as “the terrorists”. The US, and by association other countries in the western world, are targets of terrorist attacks planned and executed by terrorist organisations and in order to defend itself against such attacks the US has employed several drones in countries like Pakistan where the US is in an

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

When we think about drone or UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle), first thing comes to our mind is; frightening, alien looking unmanned aircraft that has been involved with so many bombings and targeted killings. In “Drone Home: What Happens When Drones Return to America”, from Time, Lev Grossman wrote drones are dreaded all around the globe, and possibly they have gotten this fear through the United States Military. Drone technology has been greatly improved last decade, now third of entire Air Force’s fleet is unmanned. U.S Government is sending drones to many war zones to eliminate high-ranking enemies or do surveillance successfully. Even though this rapidly growing technology is changing our perspective of war, it also changing our everyday life drastically to help our community.

Read More
1595 Words | 7 Pages

Qaddafi and Anwar are just two examples that drones have helped for the better of the U.S. In August 2009 Taliban leader Baltullah Mehsud’s death was announced, a missile shot from an unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV) was responsible.   Six years later, the U.S. Air Force is saying that the unmanned combat missions have increased by 600%.   To protect human lives, Cummings said, “I would rather send a bunch of robots to do a mine-sweeping mission, possibly with human oversight several miles away” (Tucker,

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Drone Strikes

Related Topics

Open Document