ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Health Care Physicians

556 Words3 Pages

Health care physicians are tasked with the responsibility of caring for people with a variety of illnesses. However, a patient has a legal right over their bodies and thus can refuse treatments recommended by a physician. There are a variety of reasons that a patient would refuse help, one being because of their religious beliefs and another reason may be that the patient is incapable of making informed decisions. However, a doctor should have the right to treat patients involuntary, if it would benefit the patient. It is also important to bear in mind the Hippocratic Oath when considering why doctors should be allowed to treat a patient who has refused medical treatment. The oath prompts physicians to “prescribe only beneficial treatments, according to his abilities and judgment; to refrain from causing harm or hurt” (Encyclopædia Britannica). By not treating a patient with an illness, that can be …show more content…

However, the article, “Dissolving the dilemma over forced treatment,” By Vardit Ravitsky and David Wendler argue against such reasoning. The authors claim that circumstances can account for whether a person has the ability to make a decision, in some cases they possess the ability and in other cases they do not. As a result, physicians should have the ability to treat someone that has refused treatment despite, “the importance of respecting patients’ autonomy and justify forcibly interfering in their lives.” However, the reason to force treatment should not be because of minor and none life-threatening reasons such as, taking “antibiotics for a sinus infection.” An additional reason to not force treatment is for physicians to have a chance to test “experimental therapies” (Ravitsky et al., 2005,

Show More
Related
1650 Words | 7 Pages

If the patient were to die during surgery or procedures, the physicians would not be held accountable if the patient signs the consent form stating they were aware of the risks to their care. It’s important for the patient to ask any questions if they are confused on any information that was given to them. Even though, if the patient is diagnosed with a life-threatening disease or infection they have the right to refuse from signing the consent form. Since the patient is legally competent to make their own decisions that regard their health, they can still disregard any treatments that are being done to them. In most cases, doctors that perform experiments on the patient without their knowledge and without their consent is known as unethical human experiment.

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

Atul Gawande in his article “Whose body is it, anyway?” introduced couple of cases, which discussed a controversial topic, doctors dealing with patients and making important medical decisions. These are difficult decisions in which people might have life or death choices. Who should make the important decisions, patients or doctors? Patients don’t usually know what is better for their health and while making their decisions, they might ignore or don’t know the possible side effects and consequences of these decisions.

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Similarly, all clinicians need to gain consent from nearly every patient, either verbal or non-verbal, unless in an immediately life-threatening condition. To refuse consent, a patient has to have all information presented to them by the clinician including; the risks they may face, other alternatives to the initial treatment plan and likelihood of success (SCAS, 2016, 5.3). Consent given by a patient under unfair pressure from a friend/family member or clinician, is not considered consent as it is not the patient’s decision. If a valid consent has been given, then a patient is entitled to withdraw their consent at any time. If a patient lacks capacity to give consent, and has no nominated person with Lasting Powers of Attorney, then no one can give consent on their behalf (SCAS, 2016,

Read More
1286 Words | 6 Pages

In Mr. Simpson case doctor should listen to him not his family since he have every right to decide anything he want according to ethics. Mr. Simpson know what is good or bad for him, since he have full life of experience, and he believe flu by itself is not going to kill him. We can look this case from different ethical perspectives which are autonomy, paternalism, informed consent, and competence. And then I want present and respond counter argument. First, Mr. Simpson have right to not take the flu shot because, he have the right autonomy, which give him capacity of self-determination do whatever he choose.

Read More
1461 Words | 6 Pages

When healthcare providers give informed consent to patients, they must emphasize this fundamental right to refuse treatment. They need to ensure patients understand that they have the power to accept or decline medical interventions based on their wishes. By doing so, healthcare providers uphold the ethical principle of respect for persons. This principle empowers patients to assert control over their healthcare decisions, which is crucial to fostering trust in the patient-provider relationship. Informed

Read More
475 Words | 2 Pages

Discuss the ethical implications of “medical necessity” in patient care. Ethical Implications of Medical Necessity When it comes to medical necessity can often refers to the determination that is made for the insurance purposes. For example, If the patient has a condition that is chronic or terminal, the treatment could be considered medically necessary whether then the patient can afford the treatment or not. Networked doctors may face ethical dilemmas when recommending treatment or specialist referrals. When it comes to medical necessities it can be controversial, it can be the use of marijuana when there can be others that are more a moral ethical in which it can be in manage care and network providers.

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

Therefore all health care professionals are required to provide treatment when patient has given consent voluntarily either consent or not to consent, given full information of the risks benefits and alternatives of the procedure

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

In the case of Donald (Dax) Cowart, one can determine that the conflict is between Beneficence and Autonomy. The doctors were morally right in choosing to treat Donald despite his autonomy by using the principle of beneficence. Firstly, doctors entire training is about how to save lives, so in a sense it is something they are morally obligated to do. Patients go to hospital in the hopes of being treated.

Read More
1301 Words | 6 Pages

In the case presented about a 9-yearold postoperative patient, Carla, the overt discussion surrounds the correct use of pain control by the provider, education of her family, and the rights of patient, family and physician in decision making (Post & Bluestein, 2007, pp. 113-115). Core ethical principles are also questioned in the space between the overt discussions. The moral considerations include the “moral imperative to relieve pain” (Post & Bluestein, 2007, p. 113), the consideration of a child’s autonomy and decision making ability, the autonomy and consent of the family, the autonomy and social contract of the physician and the beneficence of providing to the imperative to relieve Carla’s pain.

Read More
741 Words | 3 Pages

Healthcare in the United States is in desperate need of reform. There are several rationales to further explain this proposition. As an illustration, the Declaration of Independence states our unalienable rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In other words, every individual should be entitled to healthcare as it preserves life and promotes the general welfare. The federal government should, therefore, enact a program of universal health to better protect and serve all of its citizens.

Read More
830 Words | 4 Pages

I will give no deadly medicine to anyone if asked, nor suggest any such advice…” Doctors still take this oath when becoming doctors. The oath sets the principles of the entire field of medicine. Without it, we wouldn’t have medicine in the way that we do

Read More
1123 Words | 5 Pages

Whenever patients arrive at a healthcare unit, they are completely reliant on the doctor to make the right decisions which in turn will promote their health. Silverman (2000) gives an example of the early days of medicine. During these days, doctors ruled the healthcare society often deciding which was the right and most ideal way to care for a patient. Neglect based on race, healthcare condition and social class was common. Patients were often subjected to inhumane treatments at the mercy of nurses who claimed to further science by finding various

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

I believe the most compelling reasons to give patients maximum autonomy over decisions regarding their care is because patients should have self-ownership over their own body, and the quality of life. may seem dependent on the patient’s interest over the physician’s decision. The definition of patient autonomy is to have personal freedom of one 's decision that is free from both controlling interferences by others and from personal limitations that prevent meaningful choice. While on the other hand, a physician’s duty of “beneficence” is the hippocratic oath in which action that is done for the benefit of others such as help prevent or remove harms or to simply improve the situation of others. I believe patient autonomy over weighs prioritization over the medical professional’s duty due to the fact the main concern overall is over the patient’s health.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

All nurses and healthcare professionals are obligated to help patients and to follow through on the desire to good and not harm them. The doctors and nurses in the study did not hold up their obligation to give the participants in the study the best treatment for their disease. Since penicillin was being used for the treatment of penicillin in the 1940s, the doctors and nurses should have given the participants of the study the penicillin according to the ethical principle of beneficence. Instead of giving the participants the penicillin, the doctors and nurses continued with the original ‘treatment’ even though they knew it would not cure the participants’

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Patients have a right to complain about the doctor's refusal to the Management. Provision of Treatment requires patient’s choice and informed consent. Even if a patient has signed a general consent clause, the patient can still refuse medical treatment or procedures. However, in exceptional or emergency situations a doctor may be legally justified in performing surgery or providing treatment without the patient's consent. The patient should be competent and capable of making such a decision to give a consent.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Health Care Physicians

Related Topics

Open Document