Pros And Cons Of The League Of Nations

1064 Words5 Pages

Maintaining peace is an important aspect to the success of a country. Without it, the way our country functions would not be as smooth as it is today. Unfortunately, while everyone may wish for peace on earth, the probability of this happening is incredibly slim. Every country has their own traditions, cultures, and history. There are certain issues that nations may or may not agree with. In most cases, these nations will not hesitate to let another country know about the problem and will do so one way or another. Dating way back, international conflict remains a massive problem globally. To my understanding, international conflict is referred to conflicts between different nations and between people and groups in other nations. The disagreements …show more content…

The purpose of this plan was to eliminate the need for alliance networks and group all the nations into one large gang. There are numerous pros and cons to this idea. While we have always had rules to follow, it has been a challenge to find the correct methods to enforce them. Furthermore, the League of Nations main goal was the peaceful resolutions on global conflicts. “Whatever affecting international relations which threatens to disturb international peace or the good understanding between nations upon which peace depends (Covenant 3).” To continue, the League was composed of a general assembly. This would include a secretary, executive council, member states, and the great powers. To make major decisions it, “shall require the agreement of all the Members of the League represented at the meeting (Covenant 2).” Under Article 15 it states if the dispute is still not settle the Council will vote and if they fail to reach a report than the members of the League reserve themselves to act in a way that seems correct to maintain justice. Also, the League of Nations and the United Nations did not generate a fair way in which the right of all nations could be defended. If nation chooses not to be a part of either group, they have no chance in being defended against the violator because they are not a part of the council and the council as whole makes all the decisions. To conclude, the only way the League of Nations would prove to be successful if everyone were to cooperate and have the same idea of peace in mind. While the League of Nations prevents some of the problems that Roosevelt brought to congress in his speech, it does not do so in an effective way. If America were to be a member in this conference, the country would have to participate in every battle or fight, even if it did not pertain to us. The same would go for other nations. Although President Woodrow Wilson was passionate about