ipl-logo

Explain Why Did The World Plunge Into World War 2 In 1939 Dbq

702 Words3 Pages

Madison Gross DBQ Outline WWII 5/14/18 Why did the world plunge into World War II in 1939? What is the most effective response to aggression-appeasement or collective security? It started because Hitler was trying to unite Germany and gain land for the people. Hitler, as Germany’s leader wanted more territory so they took it. Doc 1: "One blood demands one Reich. Never will the German nation have the moral right to enter into colonial politics until, at least, it includes its own sons." Hitler suggested that Germany needed to unite all Germans under one government, the Reich. Which would be accomplished by force. Doc 2: “God and history will remember your judgement...It is us today. It will be you tomorrow.” The League of Nations did not try …show more content…

Hitler said that Germany should be treated as an equal to the other European nations. Doc 4: “There is to be no European war...the price of that peace is...the ceding by Czechoslovakia of the Sudetenland territory to Herr Hitler’s Germany.” The Big Four decided to let Germany take over the Sudetenland. The Czechs were upset, but they unfortunately could not resist as the power they would be going up against is too strong. Therefore, Hitler was successful as he obtained land for Germany and made the Czechs weaker. Doc 5: “It is possible to remove grievances and clear away suspicion..We must try to bring these four nations into friendly discussion. If they can settle their differences, we shall save peace of Europe for a generation.” The Chamberlain believed that “good will and determination” could peacefully fix the differences between countries. He said that Britain couldn’t fight in order to save Czechoslovakia. Doc …show more content…

Also, France, Britain, and other countries need to join together in order to stop aggression. Therefore, Churchill disagrees with appeasement so he is in favor of collective security. Doc 7: “The Munich Agreement was a...desperate act of appeasement at the cost of the Czechoslovak state, performed by Chamberlain...and thus secure for Europe a peaceful future.” Kennan felt that appeasement was unnecessary since Czechoslovakia was strong enough to save herself. Because it was the Czech’s fault they were taken over. It is not other nations’ responsibility to protect other nations. Also, it could have started the war because some countries that Czechoslovakia should have been protected. Doc 8: “The Germans put Hitler in power; they were the only ones who could turn him out. Also the “appeasers’’ feared that the defeat of Germany would be followed by a Russian domination over much of Europe.” Appeasement was the logical option at the time since there was no way that the Germans would not like Hitler as they both put him in power and supported

Show More
Related
268 Words | 2 Pages

The article “Teens Against Hitler” by Lauren Tarshis, describes the great challenges Ben, his family, and many other Jewish families faced over the rule of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis amid World War II. History Since the end of World War II in 1918 Germany had been struggling, and their community was in no condition for war (6). But, Hitler took power by tapping into those feelings, and declared that Germans were superior to everyone else (6). Adolf Hitler was plotting the annihilation of Europe’s 9.5 million

Read More
975 Words | 4 Pages

The nation had control over these territories, resulting in many Germans residing in these areas of land. Having these territories removed from Germany’s control resulted in many germans being forced to oblige with living in these countries which were once their enemies. This caused many German people to be outraged, along with this Germany really wanted their territory giving them more of a reason to invade there european neighbors. This is clear in Document A in Hitler’s book; “...No nation can remove this hand from its throat except by the sword” (Document A). He in suiting that the only way to remove these territories from these country’s control would be to to take them back by

Read More
1007 Words | 5 Pages

Germany gave hitler unlimited power and supported him in taking actions that began World War

Read More
171 Words | 1 Pages

Kennan’s opinion was justified because he explained the contraction before and after the appeasement, which supports Kennan’s opinion again at some point that appeasement is not needed for the Czechs. The speech that Kennan gave in document 7 proved this by saying that the Czechs defenses are very strong before the appeasement. There is no need for the Czech to scared of the German. This evidence explains the Czechs would be able to defeat Germany with such a strong defensive system. They are able to protect themselves instead of appeasing with Germany and were conquered under them.

Read More
889 Words | 4 Pages

This is demonstrated when Winston Churchill states that if the Allied powers had worked together to protect Czechoslovakia, then that could have prevented World War II (document 6). Churchill’s statement shows that collective security is the way to respond to aggression and that appeasement only provokes a war. The war lasted six years with many different battles between the Allies and the Axis’s. Hitler did not only invaded Poland, but from there fought his way through many other parts of the world such as Greece, France, Britain, and the Soviet Union. The quote, “It is us today.

Read More
419 Words | 2 Pages

Many hawks will object and claim the deal was a stall tactic by the Soviet Union. Stalin supposedly knew that Hitler planned to attack the U.S.S.R. and the pact, in force for ten years, gave him needed time to rearm” (Reuter). This clearly shows how not fighting a two-front war would benefit Hitler greatly. This means that he could have all his soldiers on one side and only worry about that one area instead of having to worry about two fronts, increasing Germany’s chances of success. Hitler being in a pact with Stalin made invading Poland much easier as he did not have to worry about soviet counterattacks.

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

The major cause of Hitler’s political success was due to the tremendous amount of fear that people associated with him. The fear of Hitler is what forced the government to grant him the enabling act, which then lead to the rise of Natsism. President Paul Von Hindenburg thought of Hitler as a threat to their power, so as a tactic to suppress his authority, they thought by electing him into office and appointing him chancellor was enough for him to feel some sort of power and settle down. It gave Hitler a voice in the government and a say what goes on in decision making,so they assumed this would satisfied Hitler and keep him contained. They were wrong.

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

2008, pg. 6). When Hitler started to become more aggressive when concurring other countries, Europe prepared for war (SA WWII Historical Introduction to WWII. 2008, pg. 8). Europe prepared for war because Hitler was invading countries that were willing to fight for their land and not just give it up.

Read More
1938 Words | 8 Pages

Six months later Hitler will invade Poland and Cowhurst argues that Hitler believed he could pull over another territory takeover due to the successful invasion of Czechoslovakia. Chamberlain was so proud of the pact because he thought it would prevent future wars from starting. However as Cowhurst states in Hitler and Czechoslovakia in World War II: Domination and Retaliation the successful conquering of Czechoslovakia will lead Hitler to invade Poland six months later. Not only did Chamberlain believe he could stop Hitler from invading more land, but so did Stalin.

Read More
979 Words | 4 Pages

Britain rejected any definitions for Indirect aggression that would let Russia to decide that assistance is required and asserted that Poland could only be helped under Polish consent Britain’s casual attitude resulted in Stalin’s belief that Chamberlain was not serious about an alliance between Britain and Russia Russian diplomatic exchange shows that the delays in-between negotiations came from the West and Soviet government answered with haste Britain made their first tentative suggestion on 15 April, and Soviet response arrived in two days Britain’s next response came three weeks after, followed by Soviet response in five days Britain then took thirteen days to send their next response, then once again thirteen days after Despite the Russian anxiety to conclude the discussion, there were evidences that Britain was late in their response to placate public opinions than to achieve much Offer from Anthony Eden to go to Russia was rejected by Chamberlain, and a mere member of the foreign officer was sent to Moscow by a slow boat instead He did not have the authority to make decisions and caused the talks to elongate Unlike Britain, Hitler promised Stalin peace and half of Poland as well as Estonia, Latvia, and

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

Everyone has heard of Adolf Hitler and how he tried to conquer Europe. He attempted doing it at the right time when everyone thought that Germany was going to lose everything, because, the national debt and inflation was so high. Germany was so desperate for anyone to help them that Adolf Hitler saw a chance to step up and be in charge of everything. Hitler was very good at acting like he really cared about his people. He claimed to the German people that he would help with unemployment, help businesses, success to the failed businesses, and to expand their army to make them more powerful.

Read More
398 Words | 2 Pages

Appeasement of the Axis powers in the 1930s was a failed policy and perhaps hastened World War II, a conflict it was meant to avoid. The term appeasement was never actually defined clearly in the 1930s and may have meant subtly different things to the politicians who either espoused or criticized it at the time. The term is now generally conceded to mean, however, the policy of attempting to accommodate and conciliate the dictators in Germany and Italy for their perceived grievances stemming from the treatment their countries received under the Versailles Treaty (1919). Following World War I, the League of Nations was established to ensure peace in the world. The League’s ability to keep the peace was, however, damaged from the start by the

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

Adolf Hitler. Arguably the most well known historical leader of all time. Though, many western societies consider Hitler an evil and inhuman man, none can deny that he was a great leader. But was he the best? Hitler rose to power with efficiency that any german would be proud of, he then created a force to be reckoned with from the rubble of a fallen nation.

Read More
545 Words | 3 Pages

Another cause of the World War II was that after World War I, the European nations wanted to maintain peace , but Hitler did not. Hitler became aggressive and started to take land from neighboring

Read More
3158 Words | 13 Pages

Background Adolf Hitler’s deep hatred of the Jews and communism, and his desire to unite the German people and showcase the superiority of the Aryan race drove him to subjugate most of Europe in order to gain “Lebensraum” or living space for the German, cleanse mankind of inferior species, and attain his vision of a Thousand Year Reich. His grand plan of conquering the whole of Europe was initially to focus German expansion in the western part before dealing with the Soviets in the east. Hence, as a matter of convenience, Germany initiated a Nonaggression Pact with Russia in 1939 to keep the Soviets in check while their military efforts are still focused in Western Europe (History in an Hour, n.d.). Following the Soviet occupation of the Baltic

Read More

More about Explain Why Did The World Plunge Into World War 2 In 1939 Dbq

Open Document