The Pros And Cons Of Journalist Joe Amateurism

1016 Words5 Pages

Integrating collegiate athlete remuneration into the current amateur system is problematic, however, media members discuss various contemporary avenues.
Common associations with the United States are free-market and capitalism. One pay-for-play structure is identical to the United States economic system: let boosters, fans, supporters, and sponsors pay who they want when they want. In this scenario, “universities should not pay any of them one cent since starting to pay any student-athletes would inevitably lead to a slippery slope of inequality that no university should advocate or represent” (Markovits, 2013). However, if A.J. Green wants to sell his jersey, and finds a buyer, for $1000 then no repercussions should follow. Journalist Joe …show more content…

The professional-amateur boundary seen in sports is most evident in U.S. college sports and continuously built up by both sides of the argument. College football and men’s basketball, specifically, rakes in billions of dollars for the NCAA and all parties involved besides the athletes. However, part of the reason these two sports are so beloved is because of the morality behind amateurism. The players are playing their hearts out for each other, the university, and the fans, not because of money. Even so, they are compensated through free tuition and education which, in the modern college system, is a reputable reward for athletics. The student in student-athlete, per the NCAA and universities, is as important as the athlete. A monumental portion of their defense, ironically, was manufactured in the 1950s by the NCAA to deter any settlements from student-athletes. The sixty years since has seen college football and men’s basketball blossom into two of the seven most popular sports in the United States. The student-athletes are not considered when TV deals, i.e. the $11.8 between the NCAA and CBS/Turner Sports, are created. There is an immense amount of profit people are making off student-athletes and are using the professional-amateur boundary to stop athletes from even receiving money outside of the direct business. Boosters, fans, and sponsors are not allowed to monetarily reward these players and if they do, the players are suspended and vilified. The boundary in remuneration for student-athletes is intricate and involves many variables. However, I still plainly believe that college athletes should get