ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Keeping DNA Database

537 Words3 Pages

Law enforcement agencies should not be permitted to maintain DNA databases on the population. Yes, I understand the governments purpose of wanting a database to help with investigations and catching criminals, however, investigators could easily misuse the information and suspect an innocent person. If a database were to be created, the government would hold a large amount of power in their hands, which would contain private information on all citizens. The government would have control over its citizens. Collecting DNA from everyone and using it to convict both the innocent and criminals is unethical. The Las Vegas case in 2002 is one example which proves why it is unethical to keep DNA samples of innocent people. Keeping DNA of innocent people allows them to be suspects for any case. …show more content…

It’s one thing for police to have to have access to the database, but for it to be in access to all citizens is just wrong. It would be greatly misused, abused, and people would be convicted for the wrong crime. With the DNA database being open to all citizens, more harm would be done than good. Since the government would be in charge of the database, they would have access to information on every single citizen. There will always be people against the government, and now with their DNA in a government database, the government can trace any information they need about certain individuals. We don’t need to question whether or not the government would abuse the database because we already know they would. We know this because the UK currently has a DNA database of its people, and it constantly gets misused and is not left secure. DNA information is extremely personal and valuable whether it gets into the hands of criminals or insurance companies and should not be

Open Document