In the article by Nicholas Carr “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” the author is attempting to persuade readers to reflect upon the impact the internet has had in their ability to think critically. Carr is trying to prove that while yes, the internet is great, the benefits do not outweigh the consequences. Saying the internet is something people should try to stay away from is an argument that most of society would probably not agree with. Even though it might be difficult to acknowledge the consequences of the internet, I think that Carr provides an effective argument to do so.
Though they both can agree that the internet creates a loss, they see it as two different losses, in which Carr’s argument complicates
Nicholas Carr whom wrote “Is Google Making Us Stupid” explains the negative consequences of the increasing presence of the internet in society’s everyday lives, and his predictions of their future. He explains how the internet is so embedded in their everyday lives that it is hard for society to imagine what life would be like without it. I agree with some of his points, such as how the internet has changed the way society reads which is consequently changing the way they think. Society may read more in this day in age than ever before, but it is a different type of reading, the majority of the reading consists of quickly scanning short articles on the internet while often simultaneously juggling different tasks.
The Patriot Act is one of today’s most controversial laws. The law’s official name is the USA PATRIOT Act, which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act. The law was passed in 2001 after the September Eleventh terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. The act greatly increased the power of the government in preventing terrorism, but it also increased the amount of surveillance that the government performs on citizens.
Net-neutrality is the principle that providers of Internet services enable access to all contents with no prejudice or discrimination against sites or products regardless of the source. In December, the U.S. government repealed the national regulations that prevented “Internet Service Providers from blocking legal content, throttling traffic or prioritizing content on their broadband networks” in favor of a “looser set of requirements that ISPs disclose any blocking or prioritization of their own content.” In summary, the government has decided to change net-neutrality and make it easier to profit from. The government’s want, and subsequent success, to change the strict guidelines by which net-neutrality operated with is supported by the Chairman
In Nicholas Carr’s essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid” I disagree that his use of support doesn’t work to make his point in this essay because it is too biased. Carr’s article shows a lot of support to his hate towards the internet by quoting himself along with his other fellow writers who are a part of an older generation like Carr himself and only includes one study from University College London. Carr mainly focuses on his anecdotes to help support his essay which really doesn’t give the audience actual information, although he makes a compelling point that Google or the internet itself is making us stupid, but what Carr has not included was any evidence about the good parts about the internet. What Carr was lacking in his essay was that
This point does go against his statement because he can not be sure that the internet will set us back, so he also brings ideas from the other side of the argument. Carr using the other side of the argument shows that he knows and acknowledges about what else could happen and the benefits, but he still trusts in his beliefs. He also uses the printing press as another example of how he could be wrong. The printing press is very recognizable, but he brings it up because people in the present day do not know about how people used to think that it would ruin our literacy like we expect the internet to. The printing press did have the repercussions that were expected, but Carr does bring up the idea that he could be undermining the positives of how the internet would affect us.
(Carr, 2008) I disagree with the author’s idea that the internet is
Most people might believe the opposite of Carr's perspective, but Nicholas Carr has a strong opinion on the internet and why it is altering the way people view the world. It is said throughout the article that the internet is causing people to lack the ability to learn on their own. As most people today rely on the internet to tell them anything they need to know. Although the internet is supplying people with the information that they are requesting, they forget everything they read on the internet because they know that they can just go back to a search engine and look it up again. Carr also believes that the internet is making people less able to form their own opinions and think critically as they just believe whatever they read on the internet.
Although the Patriot Act presents virtually many positives, the overall aspect of its existence is detrimental to the citizens of the United States as a whole. Originally being passed in order to protect the country from acts of terrorism, the specificities of the Patriot Act were never underlined which has since led to a much more generalized definition of what legal actions can be pursued on the basis of the Act. Essentially, the Patriot Act should be abolished because it infringes on constitutional rights of citizens, it lacks effectiveness in its goal, and the manner in which it was passed makes you question whether or not it was fully thought through. The Founding Fathers created the Constitution in order to protect the rights of citizens
The Patriot Act provides the United States’ law enforcement agencies broad power in both domestic and international surveillance. This act was designed due to the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001. President Bush requested this act to the United States Congress which they passed on October 26, 2001. The act was put in place quickly to stop terrorist within the United States border and be able to apprehend and prosecute the terrorist before they are able to act ("Patriot Act."). The Patriot Act was established to prevent terrorist attacks however; the Patriot Act violates the Constitution making the Act illegal.
Most people are arguing whether the internet is harmful to human’s life or not. The most representative article of this controversy topic was Nicholas Carr - < Is Google Making Us Stupid?> in 2008. In this article, Carr stated that the internet has begun to change our ways in many aspects. For example, the Internet has begun
The National Security Agency also known as the NSA, it's an intelligent organization of the United States government who monitors foreign countries and collects information of people. The NSA is economically beneficial towards the government of the United States some reasons consist of the prevention of dangerous terrorist attacks, funding's in the government, and the prevention of hackers taking over the system. Though at the same time the NSA should be stopped because they have invaded the privacy of many people without their consents. Currently, the United States has been facing terrorist attack, which has caused many deaths and tragedies not only to the United States but as well towards the world.
Net neutrality is one thing that citizens and businesses of many countries are supporting to help keep the internet free for everyone. There are many reasons why I am in support of net neutrality. The first is that I do not think that corporations have the right to throttle content. Another reason is that freedom of speech could be at risk if net neutrality were not enforced (1). Finally, the arguments against net neutrality are weak.
Pride and Prejudice Jane Austen is one of the greatest novelists of English Literature. She was born in 1775 at Steventon in Hampshire, in the south of England. Her father was Reverend George Austen, who was a well-educated clergyman and who encouraged Austen both in her reading and her writing. She started writing when she was fourteen, and by her early twenties she was already working on the first versions of some of her novels. She did not write about great events, like the French Revolution or the Napoleonic Wars, both of which happened during her lifetime.
