There is always opposition to pesticides because of the harm that it can cause on the environment and the animals alike. Pesticides though have saved a lot of hard work for farmers over the past couple of decades because it does all the dirty work, for example, the killing of weeds and other pests. Pesticides have also saved a lot of money for farmers by preventing pests from damaging crops or taking the nutrients and water supply away from crops. (Whitford, 7) In the future we need to start to find less toxic ways to prevent pests from attacking the crops and vegetation. This would prevent a lot of the other costs associated with pesticides for example, health costs for farmers that are exposed to the toxic chemicals or the killing of the habitats in the surrounding areas.
The Industrial Organic Meal is good for you because it doesn’t use chemicals & contains more nutrients. In Michael Pollan’s book Omnivore's Dilemma on page 136 he says, “To grow the plants and animals that made up my meal, no pesticides found their way into any farmworker’s bloodstream, no nitrogen runoff seeped into the watershed, no soils were poisoned, no antibiotics were wasted, no government subsidy checks were written.” This quotes proves that the Industrial Organic meal is healthy for you & it’s healthy for you because no bad chemicals makes its way into the food you will be eating . The Industrial Organic meal is also healthy for you because it contains nutrients. In the Article Health Benefits of Organic Food the author writes, “Organic food growers & dairy farmers do not use any antibiotics in their process.”
On December 5, 2012, Daisy Luther, a journalist from Northern California wrote a blog entry on the conspiracy surrounding “certified organic” labels that is claimed by some companies and retailers. She brings up the question of whether these labels being stamped on food can really be verified or are they just a way to empty out the wallets of consumers. In the website The Organic Pepper, the blogger generally gives advice for different problems people encounter on a daily basis. Through her blog entries varying from ways to stay healthy to frugal living, Luther states her opinion of governmental interference on our food supply by citing sources from articles from Natural News and Time Magazine. She first starts out by arguing about how the
Worldwide, millions of people are consuming fast food, unaware of the mental and physical consequences it can cause to their body. The fast food industry lacks to label the food they advertise, leaving individual’s clueless and with little, to no choice. In the article An Equal Shot: Big Fat America the author claims that “The real solution here is to give people the choice to eat organic foods that are in season and are locally produced. But that can only work if people are informed, and that means more labeling.” On the other hand, if the fast food industry informed people about the ingredients they are putting into their bodies and labeled more of their food items, it would be no one, but the individual to blame.
Despite the increase in organic buyers, the majority of people do not know how to merely interpret what the word organic even entails. The United States Department of Agriculture enforces and regulates the labeling of organic products, namely food products (cornucopia.org). In addition to the elusiveness of organic foods, organics are apt to be more expensive than conventional food; this is because instead of a huge manufacturing plant, one would be receiving their food products from a small farm (where a small amount of food is being grown and harvested). People choose to argue that organic food is far better for you than conventional or natural food; however, there are only minute differences between the two. Stephanie Watson, an executive editor of Harvard’s Women Health Watch, states:“The researchers discovered very little difference in nutritional content, aside from slightly higher phosphorous levels in many organic foods, and a higher omega-3 fatty acid content in organic milk and chicken” (Harvard.edu).
In recent decade, the United States has seen supermarkets continuously get filled with packages labeled with things like “Low sodium” or “No Trans Fats.” Companies stick these labels on their food to match the current fads of what is good for you and what is not. In his essay Unhappy Meals, Michael Pollan advocates a return to natural and basic foods, and deplores nutritionism. Pollan argues that nutritionism does not actually tell people what is healthy or not, and that the only way to be sure you are eating healthy is to eat natural, fresh food.
First of all, Pollan states just because it says it's organic doesn't mean it really is. If you buy an “organic” salad at your local grocery store, farmers will still use pesticides to keep bugs away and other animals. The chemicals they use are all natural, but it's not truly organic if you use pesticides or other chemicals. In The Omnivore’s Dilemma Pollan says, “Instead of toxic pesticides, crops are sprayed with natural substances, like BT, a pesticide made from a common soil bacteria” (140.) This quote proves that big organic industrial companies use pesticides to help produce grow.
There is no opinion of the younger or elderly generation. This argument believes that organic food is not better for you and there is no reason to buy it, yet there are almost no cons of why organic produce is bad. It states that, “Organic foods and beverages run an average 47% more in price than conventional alternatives.” But the claim is just broken down when it states, “That means produce that hasn't been drenched in pesticides, chicken and beef that hasn't been pumped full of antibiotics, milk with even more nutritional value.” This shows that even though the food is fake with dyes and chemicals that its ok to consume it and save the money, right?
Many people choose to eat only organic because it’s said to be healthier but when compared to non-organic food the difference is slim. Regardless people continue to buy organic products. People get emotionally connected to
Nowadays in America, we are encountering problems with our food system. The way it’s being processed is affecting everyone. From youngest to oldest, farmers to lawyers and smallest to biggest animal. Consumers are made to believe that they are buying and eating healthy foods , but the labels that led them to believe that are not completely honest. The essay “Escape from the Western Diet” written by Michael Pollan is an explanation of the theories of the western diet.
The government agency that controls use of the word “organic” is that the us Department of Agriculture (USDA), below Title XXI of the 1990 measure, otherwise called The Organic Foods Production Act of 1990. This Act established national normals governing the selling of sure agricultural product as organically made product so as to assure customers that organically created product meet the same standard and to facilitate fairness among interstate commerce. USDA management over use of the word “organic” extends to non-edible agricultural crops like cotton and rubber trees, and more extends to non-edible product derived from placental, like wool. To decision any of those raw materials “organic,” every producer should meet the necessities listed
Do those people who consume organic foods considered to be higher up than those who don’t purchase it? Scientists are motivated to study the GM food safety issue because they can raise the awareness and persuade people to accept GM crops and foods since no scientific reports proven that they bring harms to human. It may then change people’s views to understand
What is also speaking for consumption of organic food is the fact that this kind of foods does not contain genetically modified organisms, which is nowadays an important concern for many people who would like to stay healthy for longer. The organic food appeared as a result of Green
It is made with the greatest possible care and does not contain any artificial preservatives, fillers or flavorings. Organic food is good for the body as well as the environment as it does not contain any synthetic additives. Dog owners who are looking for a healthy lifestyle both for themselves and their dogs are well advised to invest in organic dog food. It is worth noting however that organic dog food is very expensive compared to the other types of food for dogs and many people feel like they cannot afford it. However, dog owners should consider purchasing organic food as a form of investment for their dogs and a preventive measure against the ailments associated with the other types of food for dogs.
It is a large and broad question which is seemingly continuously posed: what is organic food, and is it “better” for you than other food? While for many the obvious choice appears to be organic food, there are many more who believe non-organic food is just as good or even better for consumption. There are many research papers, studies, and journals that have been published which come to support of both sides of the argument. As there is no conclusive answer, further research is still necessary. Before discussing the differences between organic and non-organic food, it must be determined what exactly makes food organic.
