The Pros And Cons Of Pol Pot

471 Words2 Pages

The punishment of guards, doctors, and nurses officiated with the Khmer Rouge with imprisonment or death, is unreasonable and unnecessary. Senior officials associated with the Khmer Rouge are the real cause of all the atrocities committed during the reign of Pol Pot and his dictatorship, they are also responsible for both the physical and mental pain they caused millions. A guard of a working camp explained that the Khmers rouge had a very superior agricultural system and that’s why he became a guard, however he explained that “if you did anything wrong, you were deemed an enemy. So rows and rows of people were executed”(Poeuv). In Pol Pots utopia he had planned for everyone to be equal, at least all civilians, he based a majority of his laws and policies off of the political ideology of communism, in communist society’s or society’s that base their beliefs off of …show more content…

In Pol Pots working camps guards often beaten the civilians and we’re ordered to kill anyone who spread western ideology or spoke out against Pol Pot. If guards failed to do suck tasks they would be killed themselves. This reason right there is why guards should not be punished, if guards had failed to complete a task weather it was killing citizens to picking rice senior officials would kill them. Guards were forced to kill and beat millions, many who believe that all should be punished for their role in the Khmer Rouge often make the argument “they had the choice” if guards rebelled they wouldn’t have saved anyone they would simply be killed with them. A prison guard from the S21 prison camp explained his role in the Khmer rouge. His job was to transport prisoners and he explained how he could easily be killed or in prisoned for false accusations, he explained how one the a executioner, he asked “Are you sure you have the right person?” If I was wrong, they could accuse me