The first thing to consider is that cameras do not eliminate bias and multiple interpretations of the footage based on the viewer. As the footage will only show the situation from the first person viewpoint of the officer leading to a specific framing of the event. This could become a major concern during court trials considering that reliance on video recordings for evidence will greatly increase as body cameras become more standard in the police force. This will create a need for a documented chain of custody and secure storing for possibly hundreds of hours of footage recorded daily. That will need to be sorted, saved, or deleted as necessary.
“Pow” “Pow” sounds of gunshots fired by a police officer aiming toward an innocent person. To prevent things like this from happening again police officers should wear body cameras so we can see if they lie about the thing that actually happened during the scene of the crime. With body cameras we can also see if the victim telling the truth and if not we see the crime he had can commit for the police officer to use force. The reason police officers should wear body cameras is if the officer had used force on an individual should be permitted to view the video footage of their encounters before writing their incident report.
Imagine your plane flying over the ocean when all of a sudden BOOM you here your plane get shot down. You later realize that your stranded on an island, but you 're not alone. Lord of the Flies by William Golding is a book about kids that fled from England due to World War 2. While they were fleeing on an airplane they are shot down, leaving them on an island. With no parents and ages ranging from three to fifteen years of age you can just imagine what it was like.
Police body cameras Police body cameras are a type of video recording system, which used by law enforcement to record their behavior with the people, and also known to increase both police officers and citizens liability. One of the causes that made body cameras almost mandatory was police brutality against citizens, and especially black people. The other cause is just the inconsistency what the police says, and what the people say, why always people should think that the police officer is telling the truth.
Body cameras have potential to help, even though they have a few flaws. Police behavior could greatly improve with the assistance of body cameras. The body cameras could be a magnificent idea and could improve the public's view on police officers, as long as they are utilized responsibly. Even though they are a good idea, police cameras do have a few disadvantages that cannot be overlooked. Police body cameras are a respectable idea, and they would improve the process of arrests, allow civilians to see the good in officers, and keep officers responsible and
This “Cam” be a Great Idea According to Junior Scholastic“ In August 2014, Michael Brown, an unarmed black teenager, was fatally shot by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri.” If the police don’t wear body cameras how are we supposed to know what happens to Michael Brown. If the police do then we will know what happend. Junior Scholastic also say that “ In court, the jury can see what exactly happened.”
Pros and cons of police body cameras 7.) Video
In 2017, more than a thousand people have died from police shootings, none of the cases have enough evidence to show whether police were defending themselves or if he or she just shot for no reason. Body cameras can reduce violence. Like for an example, in the media today, stories about police officers shooting people down, officers wearing body cameras are sixty-six percent less likely to use force. It also will help de-escalate a confrontation between officers and civilians.(einvestigator) When people are being recorded, they modify their behavior. Body cameras are a great thing to have, but they can only do so much for the officer.
Speech Outline Title: Body Cameras I. Introduction Attention-getter: Body cameras were used because of Michael Brown’s death and police misconduct. B. Significance Body cameras may increase police accountability and protect them from accusations. C. Credibility: My interest in this topic is due to the latest deadly encounters with police officers and improving the communities’ safety.
So many lives could be saved and so many police officers’ careers could be saved through the utilization of this idea and the reaping of its benefits. Whether it captures a citizen attack on a police officer or whether it captures a case of police brutality, the great possibilities outweigh the potential cons of police body cameras and make them a risk worth taking. Whether one takes the side of the citizens and believe the police are typically irrational or one takes the side of the police and believe they are only doing their jobs to the best of their ability, the incorporation of body cameras to the controversial police force would be extremely beneficial for
Many countries around the world have started to join the police forces, adopting the latest technology of body cameras due to several cases of police officers shooting members of the public, often black. The footage captured by a witness of the death of Eric Garner, an unarmed black man killed by a white police officer had triggered protest rallies in the USA, yet the grand juries denied to indict the officer likewise to many other similar cases. Some law enforcement officials have now taken a step to implement body cameras on police officers, in order to draw better conclusions on the situation police officers confront. Within this essay, I will consider the advantages and limitations of body cameras to the public and police officers with
Undoubtedly, body-worn cameras for law-enforcement professionals are a good idea, as they have the potential to ameliorate the patterns of racial and social prejudice that has been haunting police and other public institutions for decades. Crime has become particularly pervasive, and the society calls for implementing more robust evidence-based methods of deterrence and criminal justice. Body-worn cameras fit perfectly in this context, providing an opportunity for law enforcement professionals to record cases of crime while also keeping officers responsible for what they say or do in relation to racially diverse citizens and crime suspects. The presence of body-worn camera can be fairly considered as a factor of deterrence for those who plan
Body cameras, also known as body-worn cameras, are small video cameras that can be attached to an individual’s clothing, helmet, or sunglasses. These cameras can capture video and audio recordings of various activities. Law enforcement agencies uses these cameras for traffic stops, arrests, searches, interrogations, and critical incidents, including officer-involved shootings. While the police body camera programs increase police accountability, which may lead to the strengthening of the public’s trust in their local law enforcement agency, some argue that these programs pose risks to an individual’s privacy and could potentially hinder the efforts of law enforcement.
Arizona State University 's Center for Violence Prevention and Community Safety on body camera studies, Professor Michael D. White states “Body-worn cameras (BWCs) are perhaps the most debated topic in policing today. Advocates and critics have made numerous claims about the impact and consequences of the technology, but most of these claims are untested. BWCs have the potential to completely transform police-citizen encounters, and in the wake of the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, adoption of the technology is likely to be exponential. This transformation, in the virtual absence of empirical evidence on BWCs, is profoundly troubling.” So although there are many pros and cons to body worn cameras by police officers, the benefits surely outweigh the negatives and more studies are being conducted to prove
A major benefit for having body cams is the fact that it will decrease the force used by Police Officers. For the past couple of years there has been many videos of Police Officers using excessive force against innocent victims, especially with African Americans. “The notion has been around for a while. But since August 's fatal shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri -- for which witness accounts varied widely -- it 's gained traction to become part of the national conversation about police conduct.” (Brandon Griggs 1)
