A Columbia University for Writing alum, Brad Tuttle in his article, 21 Incredibly Disturbing Facts About High Prescription Drug Prices published on Time.com addresses the topic of high drug prices and implies that drugs are very overpriced. He supports this claim by stating that, “The price of the life-saving drug Daraprim was jacked up 5,000% overnight last fall by the company that purchased it, Turing Pharmaceuticals, and its hated CEO Martin Shkreli” (Tuttle), then that the prices of “Epi Pens have increased 450% since 2007” (Tuttle). Tuttle’s purpose is to urge the drug companies to lower prices to life-saving drugs in order to make cancer and other diseases more affordable. He adopts a judgmental tone for his audience, the readers of Time
Summary of “The American Healthcare Paradox” “The American Health Care Paradox” focuses on health care and how the United States is suffering compared to their peer countries. The United States has spent billions of dollars in health care and the problem is still growing. The government is responsible for not following or ignoring the issue that we suffered with, in today’s society the healthcare system is failing drastically. The health care system has been a problem for several decades now, even though it seems that things are getting better it’s not.
Based on the Commonwealth Fund 2002 International Health Policy survey states that the Americans are more likely to use prescriptions drugs. Also the United States uses a larger income related inequalities in pharmaceutical use. Additionally, the price of medication in the U.S. is more expensive than it is in another country. The use of prescription drugs varies from age comparing all the 7 countries based on the graph it is easy to see that their is a high percentage of overuse of prescription drugs among the age of 18 and below. Based on the graph I am able to see that the United States has the highest percentage of more prescription drugs over the past 12 months.
but it also greatly reduces the administrative and non-medical waste that has no benefits to patients. Pursuit of profit and wealth should not be in a field that is meant to care for others; companies and corporations are maximizing on patients’ misfortunes and are therefore shortchanging the quality of care in order to get the most money. This was warned by Maimonides in 1190 AD when he said “Do not allow thirst for profit, ambition for renown, and admiration to interfere with my profession for these are the enemies of truth and can lead me astray in the great task of attending to the welfare of your creatures” (Nelson, Alan). Despite the fact that a single payer universal healthcare system is not advocated by any current presidential candidate, it is both morally and economically the most sound system.
In order for a business to get the upper hand, it would have to lower its prices. Other businesses would retaliate by also lowering their prices, turning down the overall price of healthcare (Cannon). As seen in Europe and Canada’s socialist healthcare systems, government healthcare reduces the quality of health services and greatly increases the wait times for elective surgery (Rogoff 75). The lowering of quality of medical services is due to the lack of any market drive to make it better. Instead of a business selling medical technology in order to make a return, the technology is handed out through government healthcare.
The reason that American healthcare is better than other countries is because there is a financial incentive here to be innovative and come up with new technology. When you take away the financial incentive to create a new medicine, people do not have the motivation to take the risk to create a new medicine. Creating a new medicine takes a large amount of time and a lot of money. The reason that they continue to strive to create that new medicine despite that time and money is because of the financial reward at the end. When you take away that financial reward but you have to still put in the same time and money to put into finding the new medicine, it is not worth it financially so ultimately the doctor will choose not to produce the new medicine.
Even though having soaring healthcare pony up than the healthcare systems of other manufacturing cities countries, mesmerizing substantiation pile up over the last two decades put forward that the condition of care hand over by the US healthcare system is substandard. A core proposition of condition upgrading is that what is not dignified cannot be improved. As a consequence, performance evaluation, and communicate has become established in our healthcare system. The concluding goal of properties measurement and give an account of systems is to ameliorate care and net result. Efforts to enhance documentation without become different content of clinical care are improbable to accomplish this goal.
Nowadays it seems like legal drugs are more expensive than illegal ones. This dilemma occurs because the pharmaceutical industry affects the economy significantly. Although the United States is a mixed market economy, there are instances where the economy seems like a free market economy. A free market economy allows companies to determine the prices of goods free from government intervention. The pharmaceutical industry, despite several regulations set by the food and drug administration, is a free market economy.
Healthcare in the United States is in desperate need of reform. There are several rationales to further explain this proposition. As an illustration, the Declaration of Independence states our unalienable rights: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In other words, every individual should be entitled to healthcare as it preserves life and promotes the general welfare. The federal government should, therefore, enact a program of universal health to better protect and serve all of its citizens.
In 1970s, medicalization appear through the social scientific literature, medicalization become more common. Medicalization describes a process by which non-medical conditions become defined and treated as medical problems, these problem are known as illness and disorders. People who have illness and disorder are required to have medical treatment or intervention. For examples, medicalization of aging in menopause, andropause and osteoporosis. Medicalization is being more and more serious around the world.
For both the uninsured group and those who are eligible for government assistance because of their low economic position, access to health is limited by the number of private providers willing to treat them. In many cases private providers are linked to particular private health insurance companies and won 't accept patients outside their network. These people must then rely on the overburdened public health system for care, and as such usually only seek treatment in emergencies. The public health system, while filled with competent staff, is nevertheless restricted by its funding and can therefore not always provide all these patients with the best quality of care. The inequality in health care access is a continuing issue in America and as such it is important for future consumers and workers on the Foothill College campus to have a thorough understanding of the issue so they can move to improve the problem in the
46.8 million Americans were reported as uninsured in 2013, which equivocates to one sixth of the population. Those without insurance have revealed that they risk “more problems getting care, are diagnosed at later disease stages, and get less therapeutic care” (National Health Care Disparities Report) and those insured risk losing their insurance. Inadequately covered citizens are often working-class individuals who simply cannot receive insurance due to uncontrollable inconveniences and therefore jeopardize having medical coverage. In these instances, Americans have a chance of being diagnosed with diseases that they had no opportunity to prevent or could not diagnose them at an early stage of the illness. Patients have suffered unnecessarily due to lack of health care, and “18,000 Americans die every year because they don't have health insurance” (PNHP).
The rest of the people has bare their own cost. They are either rely on state health care if they qualify, pay by use their money, buy health insurance, use tradition medicine, or go to a hospital emergency room, which, by law, people cannot taken care of because they cannot pay. American health care was in crisis in the late 2000 as noted by the author, because many Americans lost their job as while health insurance during the economic crisis. In addition many people turn six five years to qualify for Medicare. This made the federal-government decided to reform the healthcare system which also generated debate.
Healthcare is something everyone needs and should be able to get, but right now that is not happening. In America there are millions of people who don’t have healthcare insurance. This is because some can’t afford the insurance plan. There are also millions more who have health insurance, but can’t afford using it. This means that they are paying for an insurance plan, but the deductibles are so high they can’t afford to go to the doctor.
Sicko is an American documentary by Michael Moore which explores the status of health care in America. In my opinion, he has presented a clear-cut viewpoint that American health care is not producing results. Nearly half a hundred million Americans, according to Sicko, are not insured while the rest, who are insured, are often sufferers of insurance company deceit and also red tape. Additionally, Sicko mentions that the United States health care system is placed 37th out of 191 by the W.H.O. with definite health measures, like the neonate death and life probability, equivalent to countries with quite less financial wealth. Interviews are carried out with individuals who supposed they had sufficient coverage but were deprived of care.
