The Pros And Cons Of Prison Rehabilitation

1773 Words8 Pages

Over the centuries, the demand for rehabilitative justice has outreached its capacity; in fact, in a recent report from The Bureau of Prisons (BoP) stated, that approximately 16,000 people were on the wait list for basic literacy education, and training. In a society of being “tough-on-crime” it is the responsibility for state, and federal governments to develop legislation that will help further push along the restorative processes. These processes are outdated, have overly harsh mandatory minimums with increased sentencing guidelines, and over-the-top punishments for non-violent offenders. With this type of overhaul, it is possible that we could transform those responsible for the crime; along with, encouraging communities to play a role …show more content…

The criminal justice system has come a long way from the early days of the 17th Century were William Penn, a Quaker, developed his “Great Experiment” in Pennsylvania. Penn’s goal was to abolish capital punishment for all crimes, except those convicted of murder. Penn believed that “all prisons shall be free, as to fees, food and lodgings” and those prisoners should have the necessary tools and education needed to learn a trade, so that they could earn an honest living upon their future release. Nevertheless, Penn believed, that by putting these elements into practice and in tangent with his Quaker faith; it could open up to the possibilities of nurturing “that of God” in everyone. This was the main starting point of setting up guidelines that would be used for crime, punishment, and the procedures needed to protect the rights of the innocent. It was not until the early 1900’s when President Theodore Roosevelt, considered one of the most influential reformers of our time, placed many progressive ideas into motion. As he help implement new sentencing laws, the creation of law enforcement agencies; such as, The F.B.I., and the development of the juvenile justice