Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros an cons on electoral college essay
Advantages of electoral college
Pros and cons of electoral college
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros an cons on electoral college essay
Advantages of electoral college
Pros and cons of electoral college
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros an cons on electoral college essay
There are many proposed plans to run the government and decide the next president. Ideas including the District Plan, the Proportional Plan, the Direct Popular Election, the National Bonus Plan, and the National Popular Vote plan are in mind to fix the current system yet none have been decided. Currently, the president is decided by a method known as the Electoral College; however, this method has many disadvantages. In the United States today, the government runs a system known as the Electoral College.
It seems as though the government wanted every other form of electing a president to fail, because they just continued to go to the next solution without trying to understand the problem and fixing it. It almost seems as if win the electoral college came into the play they just knew that it would work somehow because they kept trying at it until it worked. The article How the Electoral College System Works states that “the Electoral college system almost never functioned as they intended, but, prescribed only the system’s basic elements, leaving ample room for development.” To sum up my beliefs on the topic, I believe as though the government should get rid of the Electoral College because it’s a scam on America.
Every four years we hold an election to decide who will be hold the office for the President of the United States. The founding fathers established the Electoral College to keep a candidate from manipulating the publics opinion and keep them from gaining absolute power. It also was set up so that smaller states would be able to have same power or say as the bigger states (Why the Electoral College). Each state is giving “Electors” based on the number of members it has in the U.S. House of Representatives, and also gets a 2 Electors for the two members they have in the U.S. Senate. Washington D.C. however only has 3 Electors.
There are several arguments both for and against whether or not the Electoral College should still be used today. Some of the key arguments against the Electoral College are as follows: the possibility of electing a minority president, the risk of faithless Electors, and that the Electoral College upholds the two party system. The arguments in support of the Electoral College are as follows: it contributes to the cohesiveness of the country by requiring a distribution of popular support to be elected president, it enhances the status of minority interests, and it maintains a federal system of government and
There is more stability within the government, state, and country when there’s only two parties. This also helps the federal government focus on general The Electoral College is the current system of electing a president in America. The system consists of the selection of electors, which is where the electors get together to vote on the candidates, and also where they count the electoral votes. The Electoral College has 528 electors and to elect a candidate they have to get 270 of the electoral votes. Each state’s electoral votes represents how many members in its Congressional delegation, along with one for each member of the House of Representatives, and two for its Senators.
Nathan Palm Mr. Baker American Government Electoral College or Not In the 1787 Constitutional Convention, one of the hardest questions to resolve was how to elect the president. (Roos) The Founding Fathers debated for months and came up with the compromise known as the Electoral College. Alternatives such as Congress picking the president and a democratic popular vote were discussed, but the electoral college was the method agreed upon by the Founding Fathers.
Following the recent presidential election of Donald Trump, many individuals have been up in arms over whether or not the Electoral College is a fair way to elect the President of the United States. When Hillary Clinton won the national popular vote, yet Donald Trump became president, there were many questions brought up, as to why the Electoral College is still a running system. The Electoral College was made at the Constitutional Convention of 1787, by the Founding Fathers of America. The Founding Fathers held many meetings to decide on a fair way to elect the President. They thought of using a popular vote, but soon realized it would cause too many problems.
I stand fully behind this article and believe the nation would function better with a popular election and not an Electoral College system. The government already has a bad reputation among citizens for taking away our right and the Electoral College system is just another example. You always hear on political campaigns that our voices matter but in reality they do not because an elector can decide not to go with the vote of the people. I understand congress is worried citizens will choose a candidate for the wrong reason, but this is the 21 century there is so much information on the internet and television. What is the purpose of giving people the right to vote if you are afraid of the decision they would make.
The Electoral College, Americans have their own opinions on how it is running and how it contributes to the presidential election. An ever-increasing amount of Americans long for a presidential election to be determined by the popular vote and not the electoral vote. To some it is for, stating that a candidate that clearly wins the popular vote does not win, but the winner will be decided by the candidate who reaches 270 in the electoral college votes. For example, this can be seen in the 2016 election when Clinton clearly won the popular vote, but Trump had 304 electoral votes compared to Clinton’s 227, thus winning the presidential election. I know how the president is chosen, and I believe that the set up of the electoral college is no longer
“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.” - Winston Churchill. This belief that the average voter is incompetent is the reason why the electoral college was created; the electors provide a barrier between the ill-informed public and the government. The founders of America, the unquestionable champions of democracy themselves, did not trust the average American to choose what is best for the country. But were they right?
As of last year’s election we all can say there were surely disputes, but who do we blame? Well, many articles have come out stating their opinions on the Electoral College whether it served its purpose or not. For example Corrie Goldman from The Humanities at Stanford say that “Why do we still let the Electoral college pick our president?” And his point of view clearly states he is strongly against the idea, he claims that “I could say fatal – flaws.
Nicholas Hom Baker 1A Government 1 March 2023 Electoral College There are many ways to elect a United States President from a random selection to a popular vote. The topic on how the United States should elect a president has been in debate for quite some time.
The Demise of an Ancient Tradition In Federalist Paper 68 Hamilton stated “This evil was not least to be dreaded in the election of a magistrate, who was to have so important an agency in the administration of the government as the President of the United States”(Hamilton 1788). Hamilton’s reasoning behind the electoral college was to protect the people from an “evil”. In modern day circumstances, “evil” could be otherwise known as a dictatorship or tyranny. The greatest fear of the founders was a person holding too much power, as they had just emancipated themselves from a monarchy holding an unfit ruler, King George III in England.
The electoral college is an institution that can be found deeply rooted in the functionality of both the state and federal government. Due to this fact, calls for the abolition of the electoral college may cause for many changes to occur in these systems of government. In order to be able to decide whether or not we as a nation should update our electoral system, we must compare both the positive and negative effects that the abolition of the electoral college would have on these institutions. To start the paper, I would first bring to attention the history behind the winner-takes-all system and the intention of the states to move to this system. I would explain that the electoral college promises two electoral votes to every state, and how this disproportionately advantages smaller states.
Several years after the United States came to be, the Constitutional Convention met to determine how the new nation should govern itself. The delegates saw that it was crucial to have a president and vice president, but the delegates did not want these offices to reflect how the colonies were treated under the British rule. The delegates believed that the president’s power should be limited, and that he should be chosen through the system known as the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a body of people who represent the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the electing of the president and vice president. Many citizens feel that the Electoral College goes against our nation’s principle of representative democracy, while others