1. September 11 served as a sort of "line in the sand" for domestic surveillance and preparedness. It was the event that provided an official rationale for increased monitoring to prevent terrorism before it happened. With regard to Hurricane Katrina, the police department was woefully underprepared and understaffed for a problem of that scale. What resulted was rioting, brutality, looting, shootings, etc.
invasion of Iraq. Saddam Hussein’s history of aggression was like that of Germany’s during WWI. Fear was evoked in the public when the George W. Bush administration repeatedly implied a link between the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and Iraq. According to Nations and Nationalism, “It appears the war against Iraq received such varied support because the initial definitions of national identities endorsed the justifications for the war to different degrees” (Becker). The American public’s backing for the war and sense of nationalism portrayed a significant role in the Iraqi War.
The American’s setback in Vietnam War is already tattooed in their history. It triggered shameful criticism both to General William Westmoreland and the US government. Even today, many Americans still ask whether the American effort in Vietnam was a sin, a blunder, an indispensable war, a noble cause, or an idealistic campaign (History Learning Site, 2015). Instrumental to this campaign was American General William C. Westmoreland who engineered the build-up and consolidation of U.S. military forces in South Vietnam. He is considered to be the primary reason why he was not able to win the war in Vietnam as he overestimated the American people’s patience and tolerance of friendly losses.
“War. What is it good for? Absolutely nothing!” (Starr, 1970). I believe that we should bring our US troops home, we need security here back at home, the repercussions aren’t worth it, and war has never solved any of our problems except for creating more.
The United States fought unnecessary wars in Vietnam and Iraq. The war on communism, in Vietnam, severed the United States compared to the war on terrorism, in Iraq. During both wars the U.S. Military spent millions to billions of money, deaths were extremely high, and both failed to accomplish their purpose. Firstly the Iraq War dealt massive harm to the United States in multiple ways.
The War on Terror was effective. It improved security and made U.S. citizens safer against terrorism around the world. President George Bush worked to counter terrorist threats, and stop threats within the U.S. He implemented a foreign policy against terrorism around the world, improving homeland security. In Do Not Take the War on Terror’s Big Success for Granted, they show the success that the U.S. had.
In World War II, 11.2% of the nation served in four years. In Vietnam, 4.3% served in 12 years. Since 2001, only 0.45% of our population has served in the Global War on Terror. Over time, fewer and fewer people have shouldered more and more of the burden.
The Vietnam War was responsible for the financial hardship in the U.S. Money was spent in the military war because weapons needed to be made. This changed caused shoping rates to increase and started to hurt the economy. This led to economic tensions in the U.S. due to manufactures. The American government spent over billions of dollars. Lyndon B. Johnson and democrats decided to fund federal bank with war cost.
The big failure America in the Vietnam War is the shameful history of tragic scene for arrogant American, whose pain is still difficult to ease. The crucial event also had a profound impact on today 's international situation. It is believed that the failure included political, economic, military and cultural background and other aspects, which are that common. When it comes to the controversial subject, I hope to put forward some fresh views from where I stand. 1.
Thesis While the Iraq War greatly damaged the credibility and economy of the United States, it was, overall, a quiet success, due to the establishment of a democratic government and the elimination of Saddam Hussein's
Solution and outcome: Bring our troops home, save lives and money. As the United Sates Secretary of State I’d advise the President to pull our troops out of Afghanistan. Obamas administration estimates that keeping 9,800 soldiers there at the end of 2105 would cost about twenty billion dollars, or 1.2 million dollars per soldier per year. We would be saving over $1 million per service member.
What Are the Pros and Cons of Military Spending? As the US economy tanked, the banks have been bailing out and the country losing its jobs, its military spending has continued to grow. For the past years, it is recorded to have increased more than 100%, which is very high compared to the height of Ronald Reagan’s presidency and the Cold War. The money allocated for the defense budget is used to purchase sophisticated weapons that often do not make it into production, but when they do, they are just too expensive to maintain.
Throughout history, war has been waged across the globe by almost every country. War has brought many positives and negatives to the United States and the world as a whole. But for the United States, war has brought peace, stability, and freedom. War may not be an ideal solution to solve problems, but it can one of the only ways to achieve peace and restore the feeling of safety into people. Everyone likes the feeling of safety, but during war time, that feeling can be very hard to find.
War is undesirable however it still takes place for the world the states are in are anarchic in nature. During such conflicts states gain and lose territories. Then what do states do with the new land? It is highly unlikely for them to simply raze the area and even more unlikely to give it back to its original owners. They will hold it for the time being, get as much out of it in the process then choose how to proceed this is known as military occupation.
The problem was that while the coalition wanted to help, they were unable to support the uprisings and Saddam’s brutality resulted in many
