ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Monkey Drug Trials Of 1969

603 Words3 Pages
The Monkey Drug Trials of 1969 The Monkey Drug Trials of 1969 was an experiment to show the aftermath of addiction, monkeys were self inflicting injury during this experiment. Monkeys were given an unlimited amount of cocaine, morphine, amphetamines, alcohol, methamphetamines, and other various drugs. They were also taught how to inject themselves with these various drugs. Many believe that this is unethical because monkeys were abusing themselves due to the teaching of the humans, their lives were in danger when they were under the influence, and some even overdosed. Monkeys would hurt themselves trying to escape because of the hallucinations. Although there are some advantages, there are many disadvantages that outweigh them. Some advantages
Show More
Related
529 Words | 3 Pages

Celebrities Take a Stand against NASA’s Monkey Radiation Experiments Back in 2009, the US space agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) opted to fund a research proposed by Dr. Jack Bergman, a Behavior Pharmacologist at Harvard University Medical School’s McLean Hospital. Dr. Bergman has gained a reputation for his research studies done on primates over the past two decades. The research involved subjecting 27 squirrel monkeys to high-energy gamma-ray radiation, and then observing how they performed tasks afterward to see if the radiation affected them in any way. NASA considered funding the project to see how long-term space missions like trips to the moon or even to Mars can affect humans, since the experiment was a simulation of

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

Changes The Scopes trial or “monkey trial” took place on July 10, 1925 in Dayton, Tennessee. Where John Thomas Scopes was being tried for teaching Darwin’s theory of evolution in a public school. Tennessee was the first state to pass an anti-evolution law which prohibited the teaching of Darwin’s theory of evolution in public schools and universities. The trial was not just about science versus religion, it was much more complex.

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

The Scopes “Monkey” Trial The year was 1925 and our country was recovering from brutal World War I. People desired for the country to return to normalcy and found comfort in religion. Peace and quiet was returning to main street, but not everyone enjoyed the peace and quiet. There was a small number of people who questioned it, disliked it and orchestrated a means to disrupt it. What better way than to cause the law, the education system and Fundamentalist Christianity to clash in a spectacular fashion?

Read More
2048 Words | 9 Pages

The Scopes Monkey Trial was an important event in history that still holds resonance today. The South during the 1920’s was still recovering from Reconstruction after the war. Which means that the South was not in favor of any National attention that could possibly be avoided. This case being in the South as well as being such a controversial topic, created a separation between the newer town of Dayton (did not mind attention) and the state of Tennessee(did not want attention). Out of which came an array of views on whether this trial should even be held or not.

Read More
814 Words | 4 Pages

Who actually won the Scopes Monkey Trial? The case wasn’t closed with a clear winner or loser. In my opinion, there was no winner, there was and still is no set religion or set course of study for science. Many people have argued over whether creationism or evolution is right, but people don’t always focus on what the schools are teaching us. Creationism used to be the primary belief, and now more and more people are losing faith and looking at evolution.

Read More
1401 Words | 6 Pages

The Scope Trial, or more commonly known as the “Monkey” Trial, was a battle between the ideology of creationism and evolutionism that challenged the American citizens’ belief in the Bible during the 1920’s. This trial had not simply strengthened the idea of evolutionism but also lead to the decline of morality, complete rejection of creationism, and the rise of faith in science. Although it took place over fifty years ago, the “Monkey” trial still has a grand influence to the spirit and general attitude of the American people in the modern era. The Scopes Trial was more than simple a prosecution trial; it was the day the downfall of fundamentalism began.

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

In addition to the hallucinations caused by

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

Many Primates go insane, rocking back and forth, pacing endlessly in the cages, and engaging in repetitive motions such as back-flipping. The primates also self harm themselves by tearing out their own hair or biting their own flesh. There was video footage taken inside Covance, the University of Utah, and the Oregon National Primate Research Center illustrates the extent of the insanity that can result when primates are completely deprived of meaningful sensory stimulation. The procedures they do to primates are Pharmaceutical tests which is a thick gavage tubes are forced up primates’ nostrils or down the animals’ throats so that experimental drugs can be pumped into their stomach, Vaccine tests is when chimpanzees and rhesus monkey are given

Read More
1123 Words | 5 Pages

The Scopes Trail, also commonly referred to as the Scopes Monkey Trial, was one of the most famous and remembered court room scenes in American history. This trail is the perfect representation of the conflicting perspectives and beliefs between modernists and fundamentalists. Through class discussion, videos and readings regarding the Scopes Trial, it is extremely evident that there are constant interactions between church and state and there will always be conflicting beliefs surrounding religion, science, and state. Throughout the course of this paper, I will discuss the context and background of the trial, the facts and information on what actually happened, and finally the legacy and why this specific trial is one of the most significant

Read More
1082 Words | 5 Pages

I found that this experiment is a little more humane than the next phase of experiments. At least no monkeys died or had to be put

Read More
225 Words | 1 Pages

After testing this theory he came to the conclusion that the monkey spent more than half of their day with the surrogate monkey that was made out of fabric, and only went

Read More
1275 Words | 6 Pages

It is hard to determine a way for the experiment to have been conducted differently. Perhaps the monkeys could have been treated in a more ethical way, but then again, the article states that the monkeys had better lives than if they would have been raised by their actual mothers (Harlow, 1958). It might be cool to try the experiment with other animals. The Macaque monkey was specifically chosen for this experiment due to its similarity to the human infant (Harlow, 1958). By trying other animals, scientists could see how other species react to contact comfort.

Read More
1287 Words | 6 Pages

Ethics in Research Assignment: Monkey Drug Trials, 1969 Stellar Wong HSP3U1-1: Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology & Sociology Ms. Politopoulos March, 29 2023 Summary The Monkey Drug Trial experiment was an unethical study done in 1969 by three researchers; Gerald Deneau, Tomoji Yanagita & M. H. Seevers. Monkeys were placed in cubicles to study and understand the effects drugs have and addiction. These chambers which held the monkeys, allowed them to observe their reactions to the various types of drugs.

Read More
1515 Words | 7 Pages

Put animal testing to Sleep There isn’t one person who could visit an animal testing facility without deciding that it is wrong. At the same time, there is not one reasonable person who could visit a maximum security prison and agree that murderers, drug dealers, child molesters and rapists deserve a comfortable life. On average, over 7,000 inmates die each year in prison, whether from fight breakout, or old age. Over one thousand animals either die immediately after medical testing, or suffer from the effects for the rest of their life.

Read More
1506 Words | 7 Pages

Drugs; an integral part in modern medicinal culture. Almost any problem can be solved with a simple pill, vitamin, or injection. However, with the usage of animals to test pharmaceuticals, there is no one hundred percent guarantee that a drug will work the same way in humans as it did in experimental trials (Shanks, R. Greek, and J. Greek 2). Unpredicted drug reactions and side effects is a big killer in the United States, taking 100,000 lives each year (Archibald 1). Yet, society abhors human testing.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Monkey Drug Trials Of 1969

Related Topics

Open Document