Henry Kissinger World Order Analysis

World order is a system controlling events in the world, especially a set of arrangements established internationally for preserving global political stability. Henry Kissinger, in his book, World Order, defines it as “an inexorably expanding corporative order of state observing common rules and norms, embracing liberal economic systems, forswearing territorial conquest, respecting national sovereignty, adopting participatory and democratic systems of government.” This definition is rather a reflection of American Consensus that has been upheld by Truman and his successors since the World War two. Henry Kissinger, for having served the United States for six decades as National Security Advisor and later as the Secretary of State, believes strongly

His analysis of Asia-Pacific and Middle-East has been deemed crucial for their linkages with the American diplomacy and military. China’s role in international relations has magnified multiple times in the last two decades. He characterizes China's historical role in East Asia as “conceptual”, whereas that of the US is “pragmatic”. The historical basis to Chinese behavior has emerged ever more clearly in the past few years, as leaders in Beijing have expressed a desire for a prominent global influence based on longstanding ideas of China as a great power. However, there is plenty of pragmatism in Chinese behavior, too. Today, Beijing feels Washington is weak and that’s why China and Japan's leaders now claim that the other's military ambitions in the region are a reason to stockpile

The great disdain towards Woodrow Wilson, founder of idealist strand of American foreign policy, clearly put forward the ideology of Mr. Kissinger: “Moral prescriptions without concern for equilibrium... tend towards either crusades or an impotent policy tempting challenge”. Kissinger’s viewfinder, Realpolitik, advocated that we were unwisely swayed by the idealism in the past. The roots of the World War I, the conflict in the modern Middle East, the Arab Spring and America’s increasing ambivalent role on world stage, were offered a vision through his realpolitik lens. With his emphasis on balance of power, linkage and triangular diplomacy and strong regards for the works and ideologies of the likes of such as Richelieu and Teddy Roosevelt, clearly divulge his stand.

The second is the balance of power as a system for managing relations between states. For Kissinger, balance of power is not just a system adapted for 19th-century Europe but he assigns timeless and universal characteristics to it. Of course, “his own greatest foreign policy triumph was to shift the balance of power in the American direction by peeling China off from the Soviet Union in 1972”, writes Jonathan