ipl-logo

The Reframing Of Looking For Richard By Al Pacino

1510 Words7 Pages

How does the reimagining and reframing of a text reveal common or disparate issues, values and ideas in society

Textual conversations provide individuals with the ability to reimagine and reframe allowing people to gain new insights whilst reflecting common ideals and disparate perspectives. Shakespeare's historical play Richard III(KRIII) was written in the Elizabethan era, reflecting the political instability and the social upheaval for power with the purpose of reinforcing the legitimacy of the Tudor Myth through the lens of the villainous character, Richard. The documentary film Looking for Richard(LFR) directed by Al Pacino in 1996, sought to engage a contemporary American audience with the deconstruction of Shakespeare's play KRIII.By …show more content…

Unlike Shakespeare, Pacino and his team reframe the chain of being and how it appeals to Elizabethan audiences by subverting the traditional hierarchy through casting choices. The use of aerial shots of castles and other grand buildings associated with the monarchy mirrors the importance of the chain of being in LFR. A shot of Windsor Castle is captured from a low angle, emphasising the size and power of the building, and is accompanied by a non-diegetic voiceover discussing the monarchy's power and influence, assisting in developing a personal connection with the audience and reinforcing the idea that the chain of affecting everyone such as monarchs and the common people. Close-up shots of actors and academics discussing KRIII emphasises show the Chain of Being affects everyone, including monarchs and commoners, developing a personal connection with audiences. Pacino states "In Search of Shakespeare, we've found ourselves." recognising recognition of their place in the Chain of Being a deeper understanding of the social, cultural, and historical forces that shape their identity and position in society. LFR explores the common theme of the Chain of Being in KRIII through cinematography and interviews, while KRIII challenges hierarchy through diverse viewpoints and casting decisions, revealing disparate issues in the power

Open Document