The beginning of King Louis XIV’s rule over France involved reforms and internal development, while his
Post Thirty Years war left France looking for a new leadership style that would give plenty of stability. What France received was Louis XIV, who would reign under the new absolute monarchy government. During Louis’ reign, divine rights controlled rank in society. This left many confused on why they were picked to be at the bottom of society, and why the king was given his power. Jean Domat, a royally appointed juror by king Louis helped explain a better understanding of the new system of governance to the people of France in his writings.
He ruled by divine right theory which held that he had received his power to govern from god and was therefore responsible e to god alone (doc 1). During this time King Louis XVI became too powerful. King Louis XVI way of ruling is by divine right . Which led to a lot of despair in his country. One of the causes of the French Revolution is the unfair treatment of the third estate
The fact that Louis XIV dominated Europe for such an extended period of time, made him Europe's longest-reigning monarch. The ambitions of France posed a serious threat to practically everyone. During his reign, Louis was passionate about expanding his nation's borders, especially along the Rhine River. He was unafraid to turn away from the traditional government system and make his own path.
Louis XIV was one of the powerful leaders in France’s history. Louis weakened the power of the nobles by excluding them from his councils. On the other hand, he increased the power of the government agents called intendants. To keep power under central control, he made sure the local officials communicated with him regularly. Louis XIV devoted himself to helping France attain economic, political, and cultural brilliance.
Even though Philip II and Louis XIV were both absolute monarchs, they were still very different types of rulers with similarities and differences. Philip II and Louis XIV were absolute monarchs who believed that they should have supreme power over everyone. In addition to this similarity, they both loved art and control over territory shown by the way they prioritized it. While they both share a love for power and art, they do not share a love for each other’s lifestyles. Louis XIV lived a lavish lifestyle while Philip lived a spartan lifestyle.
‘The consolidation of royal authority, in the years 1487-1509, was due to Henry VII’s control over the nobility.’ Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. It can be argued to a certain extent that the consolidation of royal authority for Henry VII, in the years 1487-1509, was a result of control over the nobility. The challenge lied in the ability to decrease their power without alienating them whilst removing their position of threat. However, there were other contributory factors in Henry’s consolidation of his royal authority, such as his diplomatic skills in dealing with foreign powers and the indispensable use of royal finances.
“A High-Maintenance King” (Doc.1) “No expense is too great” King Louis XIV took around 1.5 billion dollars from Frances treasury to build the Place of Versailles where he and his queen can live in luxury. The king also wasted money on items for the palace. He had a bathtub build out of priceless Languedoc marble. Another reason the people of the Third Estate did not like the King and Queen is because when no one was able to afford to buy bread. Queen Antoinette said, “There’s no bread… Let them eat cake.”
Before the Reign of Terror and all the bad events that occurred, King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette were rulers of the monarchy. King Louis was only eleven years old when he began ruling. Eleven is an extremely young age for a ruler to make appropriate decisions. He was very indecisive and he had no clue as to what he was doing. At age fifteen, he married Marie Antoinette.
To paint the picture that the king is ignoring his people and their needs of basic necessities,
Palaces already become symbols of strong power and royalty. From the East to the West, thousands of emperors marks a point of turn in history and leave the marvelous
In 1789, France was precariously balanced on the edge of chaos. King Louis XVI was ruling monarch of France. King Louis’ youth depicted him as reckless, thoughtless, and unwise. A series of bad financial and political decisions, lead to his unpopularity among the people of France. King Louis was young, distracted and misguided.
Louis XIV was a very conceited person. He thought that everything and everyone should revolve around him. Louis XIV led an absolute monarchy in France. He called himself “Sun King” because he thought that everyone and everything should revolve around him. He made sure that he had absolute power over everyone and no one else had a say in what happened.
Since Louis XIV inherited his monarchy at the mere age of five years old, his nation was run by Cardinal Mazarin until his death in 1642. After the cardinal’s death, Louis began to reform France through his absolute rule which is apparent in the words he uttered the day he came into power: “Messieurs, I have come to my Parliament to tell you that, following the law of the land, I intend to take over the government myself; and I hope with the goodness of God it will be with piety and justice” (Horne 107). Even when he just began to rule, Louis XIV had full intent to take over France absolutely for the betterment of the country. The main principle of his absolute monarchy was weakening his nobility so that they had little to no control over the state. This was quite simple when he forced his nobility to live in the Palace of Versailles, planning various parties and banquets in order to keep the nobles preoccupied so that he could truly rule France.
Louis XIV had control over everything after reconstructing the french government and he had all the decision making power. During his period of rule, which was from 1643 to 1715 he had brought his empire to the top of the chain. He made it very clear that he would hear everyone’s opinion but his decision would be his decision and wouldn’t be influenced by
