The bad leadership going to lead bad effect in Russian Revolution. “The Russian Revolution of 1917 was rooted in a long history of bad leadership decisions.”
Nicolas bad leadership lead to bad ways, for example war, bad teamwork.
But Vladimir Lenin’s tried go right way so government got scared about Vladimir Leninś and they fired him.
Provide a topic sentence that clearly states what the paragraph will be about.
“This might not have been so bad if Nicholas II had been a good leader. However, he most decidedly was not. He often listened to the advice of his German-born wife, Alexandra, whom no one trusted.” most people didn't trust Nicholas II because “he took command of Russia's troops in World War I. Granted, Russia was not doing well up to that point; however, that had more to do with bad infrastructure, food shortages, and poor organization than with incompetent generals.” basically he didn’t do his job.
…show more content…
Be sure you integrate your quote and use parenthetical documentation.
While the Czars were rich, most Russians were very poor. In fact, many Russians were serfs, or slaves, until they were freed in 1861 by Czar Alexander II. The end of serfdom was a major event in Russia, yet it just wasn't enough to improve quality of life for most people. Also he was really lazy at this point(“Czar”)
At this point Czar Alexander had a really bad leadership, for example he don’t care about he’s people, doesn't care about what may happen in future
" the protesters hoped to get Nicholas II’s attention. In the Czar's absence, the director of the police department commanded his men to open fire on the group. Hundreds were massacred. This watershed event is remembered as Bloody Sunday.” (“Czar”) Vladimir Lenin’s had better leadership than Nicholas II. ¨Lenin had already been powerful in the political scene by working with the Social Democratic Labor