ipl-logo

The Role Of Bad Leadership In The Russian Revolution

493 Words2 Pages

The bad leadership going to lead bad effect in Russian Revolution. “The Russian Revolution of 1917 was rooted in a long history of bad leadership decisions.”
Nicolas bad leadership lead to bad ways, for example war, bad teamwork.
But Vladimir Lenin’s tried go right way so government got scared about Vladimir Leninś and they fired him.
Provide a topic sentence that clearly states what the paragraph will be about.
“This might not have been so bad if Nicholas II had been a good leader. However, he most decidedly was not. He often listened to the advice of his German-born wife, Alexandra, whom no one trusted.” most people didn't trust Nicholas II because “he took command of Russia's troops in World War I. Granted, Russia was not doing well up to that point; however, that had more to do with bad infrastructure, food shortages, and poor organization than with incompetent generals.” basically he didn’t do his job. …show more content…

Be sure you integrate your quote and use parenthetical documentation.
While the Czars were rich, most Russians were very poor. In fact, many Russians were serfs, or slaves, until they were freed in 1861 by Czar Alexander II. The end of serfdom was a major event in Russia, yet it just wasn't enough to improve quality of life for most people. Also he was really lazy at this point(“Czar”)
At this point Czar Alexander had a really bad leadership, for example he don’t care about he’s people, doesn't care about what may happen in future
" the protesters hoped to get Nicholas II’s attention. In the Czar's absence, the director of the police department commanded his men to open fire on the group. Hundreds were massacred. This watershed event is remembered as Bloody Sunday.” (“Czar”) Vladimir Lenin’s had better leadership than Nicholas II. ¨Lenin had already been powerful in the political scene by working with the Social Democratic Labor

Show More
Related
1231 Words | 5 Pages

The increasing economic and social tension, as well as the war going on, in Russia just added more distractions in the minds of the Russian government. Stone shows us that Russia was not economically stable enough to handle a war, as they were dealing with the struggle between the old Russian society and the new. This

Read More
698 Words | 3 Pages

Nicholas II was extremely strict when it came to his government and as a result forbade any form of democracy in Russia and imposed absolute autocracy on all the citizens. His domestic policy was so strict political parties were illegal to form and he even made the Okhrana, a secret police that arrested and imprisoned any political critics, rebels, or those who voiced a negative opinion against the Russian autocracy. As a result, the citizens, especially those of lower class, despised the government and would often attempt to revolt. However, since the revolts were unorganized and ineffective, Nicholas II was able to end them very swiftly. After the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War in 1905, Russia suffered extreme humiliation as well as economic decline.

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

He started the trend of “czars” in Russian government and declared himself the czar or Caesar. He was also referred to as the “gatherer of the Russian lands”. He realized that there was a problem with having 5 princes govern the same area and made strives to gain complete authority. He used several different methods to take control away from his brothers and the author says that despite his skilled efforts (diplomacy, force) luck was a vital component to his gaining the power. 2.

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

In a time when the Pontiac was and French and Indian war had ended, the Articles of confederation was established. The Articles had weakened the National government and a social revolution occurred. In this context new taxes were created and a significant amount of resistance arose. Many violent protests had occurred in the 1700s, such as, the march of the Paxton boys, Shays rebellion, and the whiskey Rebellion. One significant protest that occurred in 1763 was the March of the paxton boys.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

Similar to the Tsars before him, Stalin caused the death of anyone who opposed his way of ruling, especially the Kulaks. He violated the rights of the people by launching an extensive campaign on deporting ethnic groups that opposed his leadership. Stalin’s years of “great terror” through much unneeded purges caused him to more and more act as a “Red Tsar”. The only difference was Stalin was ruling under Marxist ideologies with communism being the end result as opposed to adherence to the Russian Orthodox Church. However, just like Stalin, Alexander II was very similar in that the secret police was at the centre of dealing with outside issues towards his power.

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

Nicholas II’s inability to respond to or embrace change was the determining factor in the decline of the Romanov Dynasty. To what extent is this statement accurate? Introduction: The inability of Tsar Nicholas 11 to respond to or embrace political and social change during a time of crisis contributed significantly to the collapse of the Romanov rule over Russia.

Read More
1271 Words | 6 Pages

In 1917, Tsar Nicholas ll is the current ruler of Russia. Russia’s economic growth is increased by the Czar’s reforms of the production of factories. During this era, Russia desperately needed to keep up with the rest of Europe’s industry. This reform worked perfectly, but the working conditions of these factories didn’t charm factory workers. After the events of the Russo-Japanese War, “Bloody Sunday”, and WW1, Russia was in utter chaos under the Czar’s ghastly leadership.

Read More
1224 Words | 5 Pages

During the 20th century, Russia was experiencing turmoil in war and the country was deeply affected with Tsar Nicholas’s wrong decisions and lack of experience in politics. After the 1917 revolution in Russia, Lenin became the ruler of Russia and the USSR and proved to be the best Russian ruler of the 20th century. Before then, Tsarism dominated and Nicholas II was in power until he foresaw many revolutions against his methods of ruling. He remained as the supreme ruler and did not take actions for reforms. However, after the 1917 revolution, which Lenin masterminded, the Tsar was overthrown and the Bolsheviks established a stable government which took control in Russia.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

It begins with an introductory paragraph which briefly describes his time ruling. It continues by describing Nicholas II’s life before he became the Czar. Afterward, the article describes Nicholas II’s time as the Czar. It explained how he was very unprepared to rule but refused to give up any of his power. He was no help to the his poor starving people and ignored their hardships and complaints.

Read More
309 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever got bored of playing the same game and wanted to make an exciting one? ” The Most Dangerous Game” is a short story of obsession and insanity and not expecting the unexpected. Richard Connell was remembered for this short story. The protagonist falls off a ship and swims to an island, and gets in a game, which was created by the antagonist, where he is the prey and the antagonist, a man, is the predator. Connell’s makes “The Most Dangerous Game” is effective because he uses literary devices like simile and Imagery.

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

Write a short paragraph that identifies the Russian leader who came to power at the age of three and earned the nickname “the Terrible.” Describe three things for which he is remembered. Type your answer here.

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout Russia’s history, there have been many rulers that tried to manage their country in different ways. Even though, all of these rulers had their own unique ways of ruling, all of them were seen as terrible by the people. This eventually led to a tipping point for the Russian citizens and the Russian Revolution took place. The goal for these people was to gain freedom from their oppressive czar but instead, they got an even worse leader. Joseph Stalin was a leader of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953 and he was known for his ability to strike fear into people.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

The Russian Revolution, which was started by Lenin and his followers, was a rebellion that occurred in 1917 which forced higher powers to act to the needs of the lower class. For instance, many citizens were worried for their protection in consequence to the lack of survival necessities due to an early drought. Furthermore, their current czar during the time was incapable for his position as a czar and made horrendous decisions as czar. For example, when the czar, Nicholas, entered in World War I, he sent untrained troops into countless battles of failure which costed in mass amounts of lost life (paragraph 23).

Read More
1510 Words | 7 Pages

The Russian Revolution is a governmental overthrow of a ruling that took place in the early twentieth century. Prior to the revolution, Russia was ruled by Czar Nicholas II who was a part of the last reigning Russian monarch, the Tsar. The Tsar had complete power in Russia as he owned much of the land, commanded the army, and controlled the church. During the reign of the Tsar, the Russian citizens were treated badly and unfair. They experienced vigorous labor in dangerous conditions for little pay and were without food and money countless times.

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

I covered how Putin’s visionary leadership traits ignored key aspects of diversimilarity and show how he was methodical in planning and executing is objectives. I also demonstrated how his drive for success and a lack of open-mindedness made him an unethical leader. Finally, I reflected on my own leadership as it pertains to these lesson principles, and my pursuit to continue growing as a self-aware leader. Perhaps there would be no Russia, as we currently know it, without Putin”, certainly he has shaped his country and has effected countless lives and treasure. Influential Russian author, Fyodor Dostoevsky might have foreshadowed such a leader as Putin in his book The Brothers Karamazov: “He understood very well that for the meek soul of a simple Russian, exhausted by grief and hardship and, above all, by constant injustice and sin, there was no stronger need than to find a holy shrine or a saint to prostrate himself before to worship”.

Read More

More about The Role Of Bad Leadership In The Russian Revolution

Related Topics

Open Document