ipl-logo

Tsar Nicholas II: Determining Factor In The Decline Of The Romanov Dynasty

911 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: How did tsar nicholas ii contribute to his downfall

Nicholas II’s inability to respond to or embrace change was the determining factor in the decline of the Romanov Dynasty. To what extent is this statement accurate?

Introduction:
The inability of Tsar Nicholas 11 to respond to or embrace political and social change during a time of crisis contributed significantly to the collapse of the Romanov rule over Russia. Nicholas's inability to adapt politically to the October Manifesto and State Duma was a major factor in his inability to embrace the change shown in in Sources D and E. Nicholas' incompetence as an autocratic leader and poor decision-making, particularly during the Russo-Japanese War, as evidenced by sources D. Nicholas's inability to respond to or embrace change such as politically …show more content…

The October Manifesto and the State Duma were established as a result of the revolution of 1905 and Bloody Sunday. Bloody Sunday was a peaceful protest for reforms to working conditions, which had deteriorated as a result of the economic downturn and the ongoing war with Japan. Bloody Sunday was the catalyst for the 1905 revolution. After Bloody Sunday, Nicholas hastily drafted the October Manifesto, which demonstrates that he was only concerned with maintaining the loyalty of the people in order to preserve his autocracy. Nicholas published the Fundamental State Laws, which upheld the Tsar's absolute autocracy, four days before the first Duma's opening on April 27. Articles 4 and 9 of the Fundamental State Laws state that "Supreme Autocratic Power belongs to the Emperor" and "no law can come into force without consent," thereby removing the power-sharing provisions of the October Manifesto and demonstrating a refusal to embrace change. Source E of a British cartoon image ridiculing Nicholas's attitude towards the Duma depicts the Tsar's inability to accept change with the Duma. The image portrays Nicholas' reluctance to change his attitude towards the Duma, which failed to satisfy the people and opposition parties and contributed to the revolution and the downfall of the Romanov …show more content…

The fall of the Romanov Dynasty was largely due to the factors detailed in source D. Nicholas was an inexperienced and incompetent autocratic leader who was unfit to be the Tsar; he told his brother-in-law, "I am not prepared to be Tsae, I never wanted to become one"; this demonstrates his inexperience and incompetence as he was not prepared to be the Tsar, which resulted in numerous poor political decisions. Nicholas' poor decision-making skills were demonstrated politically during the Russo-Japanese War when he confidently went to war with Japan over Port Arthur territory and resources. In exchange for the Korean-empire being within Japan's Sphere of influence, Japan offered to recognise Russia's dominance in Manchuria. Nicholas' refusal resulted in the 1904-1905 war between Russia and Japan, which Russia decisively lost which showed weakness in Russia which led to upset of the people. The defeat of the Russo-Japanese war caused an economic downfall which resulted in the bloody Sunday protest. Nicholas being notorious for disregarding advice, which led to his inexperienced political decision-making, as evidenced by source D. Rodzianko advises the Tsar to form a new government to save the Romanov Dynasty. Nicholas's response, "That fat

Show More
Related

Psycho-Japanese War Dbq

698 Words | 3 Pages

Nicholas II was extremely strict when it came to his government and as a result forbade any form of democracy in Russia and imposed absolute autocracy on all the citizens. His domestic policy was so strict political parties were illegal to form and he even made the Okhrana, a secret police that arrested and imprisoned any political critics, rebels, or those who voiced a negative opinion against the Russian autocracy. As a result, the citizens, especially those of lower class, despised the government and would often attempt to revolt. However, since the revolts were unorganized and ineffective, Nicholas II was able to end them very swiftly. After the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War in 1905, Russia suffered extreme humiliation as well as economic decline.

Read More

Explain How Ivan III How Could He Secure The Domains Of His Father

740 Words | 3 Pages

One of the most important facts about Michael Romanov’s reign was that the power of the aristocracy was kept intact, as the power of Michael was respected and no one tried to limit his power. Another fact is that there was no dispute about who would rule Russia once Michael died. In fact the author states that the leadership was given to Michael's son, Alexis, without difficulty. Finally due to several different treaties with nearby countries, Russia was able to remain almost completely peaceful during Michael’s

Read More

Russian Revolution Dbq

235 Words | 1 Pages

But Russia had lost their commander to his flagship blown up by the mine in 1904. Since Japan had won it had shown major world power. Since for Russia, the empire had lost all its prestige’s and the population of Russia had let into an outrage and so the Russian Revolution began in 1905. For Japan, they had destroyed Russia as a competitor in the East for 30 years. Japan then was bought

Read More

The Romanov Family: Standing For Imperial Russia

309 Words | 2 Pages

Its was expected of him since his grandfather Ivan III made the Grand Duchy of Moscow into a dominant Russian state and was affecting the ruler of Russia. Ivan IV ruled from 1547-1584 when his mental capabilities stated to decline and affect his reign. Since his chosen heir dyed, Simeon Bekbulatovich was commander of main regiment of the Livonian war and appointed grand prince of all Russia. Later

Read More

How Did Stalin Use Terror In The Russian Revolution

522 Words | 3 Pages

The legendary storming of the Winter Palace was more like a routine house arrest since most of the forces defending the palace had already left for home’. For Figes “the Tsarist regime’s downfall was not inevitable, but its own stupidity made it so.” ’ As Figes is a revolutionist historian, for him the Russian Revolution was an infinitely more complicated movement than what Soviet and liberal historians make it out to be. Unlike liberal historians, Orlando Figes tries to use economic, political and social reasons to build a holistic view on Russian society making the historian's view even more valid.

Read More

1917 Revolution Dbq

1224 Words | 5 Pages

During the 20th century, Russia was experiencing turmoil in war and the country was deeply affected with Tsar Nicholas’s wrong decisions and lack of experience in politics. After the 1917 revolution in Russia, Lenin became the ruler of Russia and the USSR and proved to be the best Russian ruler of the 20th century. Before then, Tsarism dominated and Nicholas II was in power until he foresaw many revolutions against his methods of ruling. He remained as the supreme ruler and did not take actions for reforms. However, after the 1917 revolution, which Lenin masterminded, the Tsar was overthrown and the Bolsheviks established a stable government which took control in Russia.

Read More

Was Tsar Nicholas Responsible For The Collapse Of The Romanov Dynasty?

1052 Words | 5 Pages

When Nicholas’ father died rather unexpectedly, he became tsar, though he was rather underprepared, knowing very little of how to run a country and how to deal with social and economic problems. Source 6 is a quote from Nicholas himself: ‘I am not yet ready to be Tsar. I know nothing of the business of ruling’. At least he’s self aware. Nicholas was probably following along the previous tsar’s footsteps and modeling his rulings based on them, in regards to policies.

Read More

Why Did The Romanov Dynasty Fall Apart In The 1900

1649 Words | 7 Pages

Thus, Russia had finally become a great power, which would continue its conquests in Europe and Asia, primarily in Siberia.” (The Rise and Fall of a

Read More

How Did Tsar Nicholas II's Impact On Russia

716 Words | 3 Pages

Influenced mostly by Konstantin and his father, he became a strong believer in autocracy (system of government by one person with absolute power). Later on, when Nicholas II

Read More

What Extent Did Rasputation Affect The Monarchy's Power From 1908-1917?

984 Words | 4 Pages

When Nicholas departed to lead Russian forces in World War I, Rasputin effectively ruled the country through Alexandra, contributing to the already-existing corruption and disorder of Romanov Russia.” – Editor of History.com This Day In History. (2009, November 16). Retrieved from History:

Read More

The Romanov Dynasty

853 Words | 4 Pages

A revolution was sparked, and led to the abdication of Nicholas II. When he abdicated, meaning he renounced the throne, he hoped his brother would rule until Alexei, Nicholas II’s son, would be old enough to take over. When Nicholas II’s brother refused to take the throne, the power was turned over to the Provisional Government. The government soon became chaos, with people splitting into different sides. The Bolsheviks, a group led by Vladimir Lenin and Alexander Bogdanov, rose to power.

Read More

How Did The Duma Lead To The Failure Of The 1905 Revolution

332 Words | 2 Pages

After the successful repression of the 1905 revolution, dissatisfaction with the political structure in Russia was high. The firing of the Duma, the perception of the Romanov rule as corrupt and inadequate, the disillusionment of the peasants by the Tsar with the rise of radical socialist parties and the backward thinking policies of governance were all prominent factors in the failure of the Russian political system to satisfy the Russian people leading up to the 1917 revolution. At the end of the 1905 revolution the Duma was put in place to give the citizens of Russia more of a say in how their country was run which threatened the Tsar’s autocratic rule. The Duma was dissolved and reinstated on 3 occasions by the Tsar but despite opposition

Read More

Was The Russian Revolution Inevitable Essay

716 Words | 3 Pages

The Russian Revolution, which was started by Lenin and his followers, was a rebellion that occurred in 1917 which forced higher powers to act to the needs of the lower class. For instance, many citizens were worried for their protection in consequence to the lack of survival necessities due to an early drought. Furthermore, their current czar during the time was incapable for his position as a czar and made horrendous decisions as czar. For example, when the czar, Nicholas, entered in World War I, he sent untrained troops into countless battles of failure which costed in mass amounts of lost life (paragraph 23).

Read More

Vladimir Putin Ethical Leadership

1070 Words | 5 Pages

I covered how Putin’s visionary leadership traits ignored key aspects of diversimilarity and show how he was methodical in planning and executing is objectives. I also demonstrated how his drive for success and a lack of open-mindedness made him an unethical leader. Finally, I reflected on my own leadership as it pertains to these lesson principles, and my pursuit to continue growing as a self-aware leader. Perhaps there would be no Russia, as we currently know it, without Putin”, certainly he has shaped his country and has effected countless lives and treasure. Influential Russian author, Fyodor Dostoevsky might have foreshadowed such a leader as Putin in his book The Brothers Karamazov: “He understood very well that for the meek soul of a simple Russian, exhausted by grief and hardship and, above all, by constant injustice and sin, there was no stronger need than to find a holy shrine or a saint to prostrate himself before to worship”.

Read More

Sir Isaac Newton Research Paper

539 Words | 3 Pages

THE FAMOUS STATUE OF SIR ISAAC NEWTON The statue of Sir Isaac Newton junior is at Trinity College in Cambridge. Sir Isaac Newton was born in January 4,1643 in wools Thorpe by Colsterworth, United Kingdom. Also in his lifetime Sir Isaac Newton had discovered gravity. One day he was sleeping under a tree and he woke up when he got hit in the head by a apple falling from a tree.

Read More

More about Tsar Nicholas II: Determining Factor In The Decline Of The Romanov Dynasty

Related Topics

Open Document