Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of media on politics
The influence of media on politics
The influence of media on politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The influence of media on politics
The influence of media on politics
The influence of media on politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The influence of media on politics
The election of 1824 was very different than today’s elections. It set the stage for the 1828 Presidential Election to birth the “Modern American Political Campaign.” There were four candidates for the campaign in 1824. They were all from the same party. This prevented all of them from being able to get enough Electoral votes to become President.
In general, those who identified as Republican or Democrat or had leanings to one side or the other in the 2016 election voted for that party’s presidential candidate regardless of whether or not they actually liked that candidate in particular with very few exceptions. Some viewed this kind of extreme partisanship as new and as something that made the 2016 election even more unusual than the media was already claiming it to be. However, the election of 1800 also showed an extreme amount of partisanship, indeed probably the first of its like. In that election, every state that was solidly Federalist or solidly Democratic-Republican voted accordingly, with the few swing states deciding the election, though their votes were really decided sometimes months before the election due to the nature of the electoral system at the time; the congressional elections of the “swing states” during the election year were what really decided the states’ electoral votes since the methods of choosing electors for the electoral college from each state was controlled by each state’s congress. Similarly in the 2016 election, all of the solidly Republican states and all of the solidly Democratic states voted accordingly with only a few swing states deciding the election.
There is one specific Presidential election that, in my mind, had the most significant impact on the United States. This is the Election of 1860. The main topic during this election was slavery. It was up to the people of the United States to decide the fate of their country. Similar to how the country was split at the time, both candidates held two opposing viewpoints on the issue.
The elections of 1800 and 2016 show a similarity in the way each party attacked each other. Many people think that the 2016 presidential election was the worst for mudslinging that there has ever been. However, if we look back to the presidential election of 1800 between Jefferson and Burr, we would see very similar picture. In the 1800’s, the candidates and their political parties would use their influence with the media to spread lies and misinformation about the other candidates, just like they did in the 2016 presidential election. It seems the media of today has definitely chosen sides just like they did in the 1800’s.
The turmoil, upheaval, and controversy of the 2016 Trump election is a significant current event of the modern world, but this landslide election is not the first in America’s history to raise such conflicting opinions. The Revolution of 1800 was another shift in political history that impacted not only the candidates, but majority of the public. The defeat of John Adams to Vice President Thomas Jefferson led to the rise of the Democratic-Republican Party rule and the eventual demise of the Federalist Party. Often in politics, opposing views, scandals, and negative publicity plays a role in the election process, due to this, in both the 2016 election and 1800 election negative criticism from both parties was evident. The 1800 and 2016 elections
The events were first the debates, next the election, then the events that followed. Without this election our county would have a different way of running this government. It is a large possibility that without this election, slavery would still be legal in the United States today. These three main candidates all had very different outlooks on running the country, and with every different candidate, new ideas were expressed.
Republicans and Democrats alike hastened into polling places to cast their vote. Legal American citizens placed their ballots to make their voice heard above all the white noise of politics. Today, America is deeply rooted into the Two-Party system. This system establishes organization that keeps chaos from claiming this free land. Without this structure that naturally assumed position from the very first election, all citizens would be thrown into disarray, immediately confused by the change.
“The Electoral College was created by the Founders because they did not trust people enough to allow them to directly elect the president.” Since the majority of the American people had limited education and communication, the founders felt the “average voter lacked the information to be an informed, unbiased judge of candidates for presidency.” Therefore when voters cast their ballot, the college reviews the peoples’ choices and then decides which of their preferences are best. (Lenz and Holman, 87) Many people feel that this system is undemocratic because they are not able to directly vote for their candidate and because the winner of the popular vote can lose the electoral vote.
Patricia Totman Briefly explain how the Electoral College works. Do the most "popular" votes always decide the presidency? Do you think the Electoral College is the best way to elect the president? Discuss some alternatives to it (based on your research).
The Electoral College was made because the first leaders did not want a government where only the majority of its people ruled. They thought that it would be unfair. They believed that a pure democracy would destroy the country. There are two parts in the voting process. The first part is democratic.
A sad truth comes to light as the results of a tight race for the next president starts to roll in. The truth is that the dysfunctional system that demonstrates the whole voting process takes the future of America 's leader, the one who will set many precedents and lessons for future generations to come, into the hands of former politicians and notable political figures, who take on the careless and unnecessary role of an elector. These electors are part of a voting system called the Electoral College. The Electoral College is a group of 538 people that are elected at state conventions to officially vote for the next presidential candidate based on each state 's popular vote. This structure is old and should be banned for several reasons.
The United States hinges on the statues of a democracy, right? At least that is what the founding fathers envisioned. However, the Electoral College, the United States presidential voting system, has made various notable figures and scholars question its use in modern day society. I strongly contend that the Electoral College is not a legitimate and effective vehicle for electing presidents. Although the Electoral College is a foundational aspect of the US government, it needs to be reexamined, amended, or replaced with, perhaps, a direct voting system, in spite of those that argue that a direct voting system would allow too much large power to the states (Limbaugh, 2000).
The president of the United States is of utmost importance to the nation’s progress and success, both domestically and internationally. Hence, it follows that presidential elections are quite a popular event on a national level. Since the nation’s creation in 1776, it was clear that the president must be chosen wisely as well as fairly in order to preserve a democratic character in the United States and also to ensure an incapable president is note elected by the people. The solution that followed in response to these considerations was the establishment of the Electoral College, a method of indirect election of the president and his or her running mate for the vice presidency. The Electoral College establishes a group of electors who pledge to vote for the candidate of a specific political party.
The Electoral College is a longstanding organization in place in the United States of America that was originally established by the Founding Fathers in create equality in presidential elections has become a topic of harsh criticism and controversy over the years. The Electoral College was established by the Founding Fathers of the United States at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in order ensure there was representation of the people while keeping the best interests of the nation in mind (“What is the Electoral College?”). At the time of the writing of the Constitution, there were two main ideas on how to elect a president. The first was that there should be a simple vote of all eligible people and who ever gets the most votes becomes
Americans strive to fight for what is right. Americans who vote will vote for the candidate who shares the same political views as the voter. It is fascinating how unconsciously Americans, as voters, oftentimes forget to take the time to contemplate why the candidate that shares the same views as us is right. Political parties have led us as a nation through dark times, such as the Great Depression, they serve as a vital lifeline for our government. Without any political parties there would be not representation, voting would become exceedingly complicated than it should be, our government would change entirely.