Frankenstein analyzes knowledge, and the pursuit of it, in the environment of the industrial age. The book further examines the ethical, moral, and religious effects of science. Victor Frankenstein, the main character, is the key guide in the book who shows the dangers of knowledge. Yet, Mary Shelley, the author, contradicts herself within the text and seems to say that curiosity is inherent in mankind and cannot be done away with. Frankenstein’s monster is shown as a scientific feat; however, it seems to only bring sorrow and devastation to the creator. It’s as if the universe decided to use Frankenstein’s monster as a punishment towards the creator for his need, or addiction, for knowledge. It reminds me of the story of Prometheus, he gave man fire which was supposed to be for immortals only (a divine knowledge). This is reflected in Frankenstein, where Victor reaches past regular mortals to obtain a secret only meant for those with divine power. In essence, Dr. Frankenstein obtained the power of God and made life without man or woman. …show more content…
He says, “learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge…” But even still his statement is saturated in contradictions. Victor first demands his listener to “learn” from him and then he warns of the danger of knowledge. Knowledge is linked to learning, one leads to the other. Victor’s statement of “how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge” contradicts his demand to listen, which then means he doesn’t want the listener to take his advice. Victor then says the man “who believes his native town to be the world,” is “happier” than one who has a thirst for