Rome’s constitution had three different elements which held independent powers and shared their ideas to prove the constitution was democratic. The consuls and magistrates were the supreme masters of government and called together the People’s Assemblies to carry out whatever the majority of what the Assemblies decided (Doc A). Polybius also greatly admired how the Romans structured their
The Roman Republic was often known for its lasting influence for the development of Western political governance and ideals and is often hailed as a beacon of democracy in ancient history. But an in depth look reveals it to be more complex. While the Roman Republic held democratic elements that allowed citizen participation and representation, its political structure was ultimately characterized by a significant concentration of power among the elite and few for the average person. This essay will explore the extent of democracy within the Roman Republic, analyzing key aspects such as the electoral system, legislative bodies, and social hierarchy and the democratic nature and the implications it had on the overall governance of the state.
Polybius goes on to say, “no one can say for sure whether the constitution is an aristocracy or democracy or despotism” in Document A. He then explains how the Roman Republic was each of them, an aristocracy, a democracy, and a despotism, for various reasons. One of these reasons was that, at times, the consuls, or the magistrates, and the Senate had more power than the Assemblies, but in different situations, it was the opposite. This shows that even Polybius, a man who was actually alive during the Roman Republic, didn’t know how to label
The Senate was a group of legislators that was selected from the elite and wealthy class The Senate had two co consults to keep each other in balance There was a dictator that controlled everything when the Republic was in danger Caesar conquered several lands with the help of Pompey and Crassus By 48 BCE, Caesar was in control of all of Rome’s holdings
The most important officials were the consuls, who served as chief executives of the government. They were elected every year by an assembly of citizens. The Roman Empire, on the other hand, was ruled by an emperor who had absolute power over the state. Another key difference
Roman VS United States senate The Roman and United States senate are both very similar, and it is clear that the Roman Senate was a precursor to the United States Senate. As the Roman Senate came first and we could watch the history unfold, the United States made smarter decisions to create a more stable and people-serving government. Those who do not learn history repeat it, and with the advantage of time the US Senate got to learn from the Romans mistakes. I will be taking the position that the United States Senate is better and more efficient than the Roman Senate. I am going to give a light overview of each Senate, and compare and contrast them.
All characters cope with different situations in their own ways. In Tim O’Brien’s novel The Things They Carried, his character cope with the effects of the Vietnam War differently. O’Brien’s character Mary Anne and Norman Bowker deal with the war the only ways they know how to. Various characters in O’Brien’s novel deal with the war and its repercussions that occur.
Each council would have a kind of leadership group within it. 4 members would be chosen who would lead, and out of those there would be the leader of the city. This leader would not only control the city but the surrounding area to. Although the nobility provided leadership, they weren 't automatically put in government
Turkey Fever There is no wonder so many folks have caught the turkey fever across America. Turkey fever has become the remedy for cabin fever for many outdoors people and for good reason. There are very few things greater than to see a big gobbler strutting along a ridge-top on a cool spring morning especially if they are heading your way. The woods are greening up and the birds are singing as you hit the slate lightly to keep them coming and two of the old strutting toms let out a gobble and swell back up to display those tail feathers. One of the gobblers begins to spit and drum as they slowly approach your decoys.
The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion
The magistrates and tribunes… were the only ones who could place legislation before the voters.” The small percent of citizens that actually did vote in Ancient Rome were spoon-fed their candidates by higher ups like the magistrates in
The Roman Republic was an ancient Roman civilization that was created after the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom in 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the creation of the Roman Republic. The Roman Republic was created in order for the rich men named aristocrats to gain even more power by removing kings from the Roman government. Soon after, the Roman upper class turned politics into a violent competition in their strive for power. Gaius Marius’ creation of “client armies” led soldiers to become more loyal towards their commander than the republic. This resulted in a commander named Lucius Cornelius Sulla overtaking Rome with his client army and establishing himself as a dictator.
Augustus was only 17 year old when he had a positive relationship with the Senate because Augustus wanted to raise the tone of the Senate, reduce, its numbers, restore its former dignity, increase responsibility of its members and improve its efficiency. This relationship with the Senate remained for the rest of the Julio- Claudian Dynasty. Thus shows that Augustus had a positive relationship with the Senate. One of Augustus main aims was to reduce the size of the Principate he would work with, Augustus had reduced its numbers from 1000 and 800 in 23BC and then 600 in 27BC, and then 400 in 18BC by removing disreputable members who entered the Senate prior to Augustus through bribery or influence. Augustus laid down a monetary qualification of one million sesterces and added worthy men from the equestrian class.
The government was a tripartite government. That means that they have 3 parts, and those three parts were the senate, magistrates and the assemblies. How did the laws get enforced to the people? The assemblies were held. At assemblies, Roman citizens elected officials who would soon enforce the law.
The General Assembly and Senate established a sense of importance in Rome. The General Assembly was made up of Plebeians, and the Senate consists of Patricians. The terms General Assembly and Senate are two of many terms still used in the US Government today. The Romans were led by a king who was approved by the senate and a vote of the people, which is also displayed in the US Government. This is displayed in our presidential elections.