Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal testing unethical
Animal testing unethical
Why animal experimentation is unethical
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal testing unethical
Animal testing unethical
Why animal experimentation is unethical
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Nathan Lacy Psych 1311 L. L. Boyarsky and Stewart (1957) studied what happens when cats and dogs were made to shiver through cold then introduced to an electric shock. Each animal had one leg hooked up to a phonograph crystal pickup by a rubber band in order to record the intensity of the shivering. Then, the cats and dogs had ice placed on their noses to induce a cold shiver. Once the shiver had started, the animal would be introduced to a specific voltage of electricity for a specific time frame. They tested out three different voltage and cycles of the voltage per second combinations (70 volts at 40 and 60 cycles and 40 volts at 60 cycles a second).
This particular video was humorous at first in the 1st or 2nd dosages of shock. Then it progressively became more sinister by the second. Then anxiety began to kick in at the stage were the student role began to discontinue reaction. The fact that they only continued
Within 24 hours of the experiment, the prison guards began to humiliate and mentally abuse the prisoners. The prison guards were given little instructions about how to treat the prisoners, except that there was not to be any physical force used on the prisoners. The lack of instructions that
The School of Shock by Jennifer Gonnerman is an article that was posted on a political blog, Mother Jones, on August 20, 2007. The article outlines the disturbing details of a behavior modification facility for severe special needs children and adults in Canton, Massachusetts. The facility, known as the Judge Rotenberg Center, uses shock-devices or “applications” from a “Graduated Electronic Decelerator” (GED) as “aversion therapy” for unfavorable behavior. The Judge Rotenberg Center (JRC) was founded by Dr. Matt Israel, Ph.D. to serve patients with extreme behavioral disorders without the use of medications or psychiatric therapy. Dr. Israel’s concept is that after repeated shocks, students will cease their bad behaviors, however, JRC is the only facility in the United States of America to uphold these practices.
Have you ever got bored of playing the same game and wanted to make an exciting one? ” The Most Dangerous Game” is a short story of obsession and insanity and not expecting the unexpected. Richard Connell was remembered for this short story. The protagonist falls off a ship and swims to an island, and gets in a game, which was created by the antagonist, where he is the prey and the antagonist, a man, is the predator. Connell’s makes “The Most Dangerous Game” is effective because he uses literary devices like simile and Imagery.
The student and teacher were placed in separate rooms and an instructor was placed in the same room as the teacher. He would then attempt to convince the teacher to continue the experiment even if the student starts crying out or wanting to leave. The teacher was required to “shock” the student if they said an incorrect answer. However, the ‘shocks’ became more intense and came with each incorrect answer. They eventually started getting very dangerous and potentially life threatening.
Second, The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychological study that was too inhumane to continue because of the behavior of the prison guards when handed with superiority and the mental breakdowns of the prisoners. E: “Now, you 'll all be given sunglasses and uniforms to give the prisoners a sense of a unified, singular authority… And from this point forward you should never refer to this as a study or experiment again,’’ (Dr. Phil Zimbardo).
The Torture Lab: Regression or Torture? Naomi Klein in the chapter, The Torture Lab discusses the effect of shock therapy in humans and the economy. Klein looks further into the effects of psychiatric shock therapy and experiments conducted on people without their consent. Cameron’s theory was that shocking his patients would bring them into a blank state where everything before was wiped away.
I decided to conduct my research on the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE). This study was conducted in August of 1971 by a psychology professor named Phillip Zimbardo. The bases of the study was to focus on the psychology of human behavior, more specifically psychological effects between prison guard and prisoner. The experiment was to last 2 weeks but only lasted 6 days, due to dangerous behavior between the guards and prisoners. Twenty-four people volunteer to participate in the study, out of this group, they were randomly selected to be either prisoner or prison guard.
Shock collars can create adverse behavioral effects, such as associating a neutral object with pain from a shock collar, in which creates a negative association. The text state’s “...e-collars in training are associated with behavioural and physiological responses that are consistent with significant negative emotional states; this was not seen to the same extent in the control population. It is therefore suggested that the use of e-collars in training pet dogs can lead to a negative impact on welfare…” (Defra). This illustrates that shock collars can lead to a negative impact on the dog.
Like Psychologist Diana Baumrind did so in her article “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments”. Where she makes it very clear that she disagrees with causing individuals stress and discomfort. In her article, Baumrind states “It is potentially harmful to a subject to commit, on the course of an experiment, acts which he himself considers unworthy, particularly when he has been entrapped into committing such acts by an individual he has reason to trust” which in this case the trustworthy individual would be Stanley Milgram. Baumrind also worried about the dangers of the serious aftereffects that may ensure because of the stress and discomfort Stanley Milgram’s experiment has caused. Even though Stanley Milgram states that “After the interview, procedures were undertaken to assure that the subject would leave the laboratory in a state of well-being.”
She only stood, because if she ran they would shoot…” (4). The guards and the soldiers are symbols for the change of morality. They have the feeling that it is their right to take over other people’s lives such as Magda’s and the prisoners’, who are also damaged physically from the harsh treatment they receive. When looking at Milgram’s experiment, subjects also treat the students as if they were animals: “Of the 40 subjects, 26 obeyed the orders of the experimenter to the end, proceeding to punish the victim until they reached the most potent shock available on the shock generator”(Milgram). Most of the subjects accept the authority even though they knew that it may be dangerous to shock the victims with high voltage.
The "teachers" continued, at the 180 volts mark the "learner" cried out that he cannot take it any longer. Once reaching 300 volts, the fifty-year-old "learner" yelled about his heart condition and begged to be released. At these points, a decent amount of "teachers" halted the experiment while a large percent continued until the final 450 volt question even though the "learner" had stopped responding. At the 150 volt mark those who were going to stop, did so. If I were in this position I would stop at the first sign of discomfort from the "learner."
The results show that when the person in control, presumably the man in the lab coat, told the volunteer to shock the person, even give them a deadly amount of voltage, they would. Just because they were doing what the person in charge was telling them to do. This is the same thing that happened in Hamlet. When Hamlet saw his dad he became the person in charge and Hamlet would do
For every pair that is incorrectly matched the voltage will go up, going all the way up to 450-volt shock. Also each time that the teacher is going to administer a shock they have to iterate the voltage amount. When the experiment begins nothing eventful occurs because the voltage levels are low. As the voltage starts going up we start to hear the learner making noises (uhg), initially the participant does not react. After it happens again we see the participant ask a question regarding the noise, but continues when instructed.