Life in sparta was different than athens because sparta had no interest in art,music and education. Everything was centered in sparta was focused on the military. My opinion strengths did not outweighed the weakness of sparta education and I will explain how the strength was the most important than caring the weakness of sparta education.
Because of this they created a military like society. Everything was controlled by their government. Sparta may have had weaknesses in their education but their were more positive than negative parts. The strengths of Spartan education did outweigh the weaknesses because they trained Spartan boys for war and battle, women were also trained, and Spartan babies, from birth, were expected to be healthy.
A strong military was a top priority in Sparta. At the age of seven the boys in Sparta were taken away to military training. At the age of thirty you would join the professional army and you could marry. Sparta had one of the best, and strongest armies in ancient
Haleh Saleh Mr. Neidich World History Period: 8 Sparta Vs. Athens Ancient Greece is a land of many city- states. Each city- state had its own government, law, rulers, and customs, also the city- states did not get along. Two of the most famous city- states are Sparta and Athens. But if anyone would have to pick one to live in most of the people would pick Sparta.
Sparta on the other hand, forced they young boys to join the army at the ages of 7-13. In Athens you could get a good education and could pursue several kinds of arts and sciences. Sparta people didn't care about education they were focused on military strength and
Even though Athens and Sparta were both city-states of Greek culture and had some similar governmental structures, they differed very much in the way each society was governed. Spartan society was a warrior society and this influenced every aspect of the Spartan way of life. Only free Spartan men had the right to participate in public life and making decisions that affected the community. Other elements of the Spartan society, such as women, Periokoi (neighboring non-Spartans) and Helots (serf slaves), had no saying in any decision making. Nevertheless, there was still inequality between the free Spartan men.
Ancient Greece is known for its rich history and culture, one of the most fascinating aspects of which are the varied forms of government in different city-states. Athens and Sparta are two city-states that are often compared for their differing ideologies and ways of governing. While both were major powers in ancient Greece, they had distinct differences in their government structures. Athens is known for being the birthplace of democracy, while Sparta was known for its unique dual kingship system. In this essay, we will delve deeper into the dissimilarities in the government structures of these two city-states.
Women were thought of as dependents of the father or husband. Women lived in gynaeceum: women’s quarters where they could oversee the running of the home and have very little contact with the male world (O’Pry, 2012). Spartan women, on the other hand, seem to have a bit more freedom and were able to own property. Sparta allowed for women to get educated in the same manner as the males. Sparta had a laid back culture and men were to serve in their military.
Mandatory military service was imposed on all male. So as long as a citizen of Sparta was male and free, he can be considered a member of the assembly. Being part of the assembly meant that members can “pass laws and make decisions war.” However, their power was heavily curtailed by the Ephors and the Gerousia. The Ephors made up the “executive branch” of Sparta government.
Sparta was a military state, and the military was the primary institution through which citizens participated in public life. The Gerousia, a council of 28 elders, was the most powerful institution in Sparta. It was responsible for making policy decisions, and its members were selected for life. In Athens, public office was held by a broad range of citizens, including members of the aristocracy and the common people.
Introduction Athens and Sparta were two of the most significant city-states in ancient Greece, each with unique systems of government. Athenians and Spartans were both known for their dedication to their city-state and their participation in public life. However, the methods of participation and the nature of the governance were distinct. This paper will discuss how people in Athens and Sparta obtained the right to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community, who held public office, the rules governing the selection of public office holders, and the similarities and differences between the two city-states' governmental structures. Participation in Public Life
Athens vs Sparta There once was a city who loved war and another city who loved wisdom. Sparta and Athens were both city-states in Greece, yet they had very different beliefs. Athens believed knowledge was more powerful than strength and Sparta believed strength was more powerful than wisdom. Sparta would be a better city to live in because women have more rights, they would only get involved in war if it was necessary, and they were militaristic. Spartan women were given more rights than Athenian women.
Sparta and Athens Introduction The purpose of my paper is to compare and contrast the ancient peoples of Athens and Sparta with respect to how their citizens obtained the right to participate in public life, which of their citizens were able to hold public office, and what rules governed their selection. I will also touch on how the governmental structures of the two city-states were similar and how they were different. Discussions Who could participate In both Athens and Sparta there were several qualities that were needed for one to be even considered for any kind of membership in any of the voting assemblies or as someone who held political office.
Boys did not get a choice in their future, for they either shortly died after birth or became warriors, and girls also had no choice, dying shortly after birth or enduring hard training and becoming mothers who raised warrior children. Clearly, the peaceful, Athenian ways greatly contrasted with the harsh Spartan
In Athens, public offices were held by wealthy citizens who were elected by their peers in the assembly. In Sparta, public offices were held by two hereditary kings, an assembly of elders, and five ephors (Brand, 2010, pp. 9-10). The kings held the highest authority and were responsible for creating and executing laws. The Assembly of Elders consisted of Spartan citizens over sixty years old, while the ephors were five public magistrates who held the most political power in Sparta (Brand, 2010, pp.
