More handpicked essays just for you.
Class and caste system in social inequality
Racial discrimination in america
Racial discrimination in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For a society to run, there should be a proper balance in every other step and to maintain that there had to be certain classes which executed their activities as per the need of the society. So, it was totally fine to have the different level of classes. There are laws which would not let poor be affected easily unless they are the culprit and they would be compensated with money if they are not found guilty. It sounds even as each group was best represented in their own way.
wensby argues that the balance of power in 17th century New Spain is maintained through each individual’s involvement in society rather than a top bottom power structure. Power alone was not what upheld justice because each social level held the capacity to exercise power that was contingent on the complex set of social conventions of 17th century New Spain. The law cannot be separated from the social norms that were the members of New Spain valued. The legal system itself can attest to this argument, as the courts specifically the tribunal made rulings based social norms instead of solely the law. The supposed powerless did hold sway in their outcome, as we see with the cases Owensby presents.
When the new world was discovered, everyone wanted the land. Settlers crossed the Atlantic for different reasons, these reasons were why they settled. Their government took different approaches to their colonizing efforts. France and Spain had dictatorial kings whose rule was absolute, and the English came from England. The different reasons they came are, sources of colonial population, economic, and relations with the Native Americans.
For example, because it is believed karma affects reincarnation, a person is born into a caste and is then forced to stay in that caste for the remainder of their lives. Document 3 states, “Their caste membership determined the work they did, whom they could marry, and the people with whom they could eat.” This could work out well for some people but not as much for others. For example, the untouchable group is the lowest Hindu caste, and they often don’t have any other choice than to work filthy, unsanitary jobs such as cleaning public toilets. Another way Hinduism affected people was by their decisions.
Rulers held the highest position in the social class they had the most rights and were able to tell people to do things (creating). Rulers actively took part in religious ceremonies,rulers most likely did that because they wanted people to know that they are still religious (Aztec class structures). Rulers made all the decisions about the government since they were the highest class (creating). The upper class includes rulers, warriors,nobles, merchants, and artisans, nobles could have been royal families, lords, and priests (Aztec class structures). Artisans were able to get rich since merchants could have been able to trade or sell their art (Burstein 417).
There are many different societies in our world today, and each of these communities treat and group their people differently. While some places, like the United States, do not have set groups, others, like India, have very strict laws about what each class can and cannot do. The Caste system in India is a great example of how one society strictly groups their members. The Caste system is a class structure that is determined at birth.
First of all, the society was completely reliant on the people as a whole, like any other collectivist group. The problem with this
History of the particular policy domain, social and political processes, like McGirr in “Making Radical Reform” and Alexander in “The Rebirth of Caste”, policies regulating the use of substances, the prohibition of alcohol in McGirr and the War on Drugs in Alexander, were developed in response to larger social and political power struggles around ethnicity and or race. In McGirr's reading, we can see an illustration of how prohibition was linked to racism affecting the latest immigration waves in the nineteenth century. In the New Jim Crow, Alexander described the racialization of drugs such as crack cocaine as the primary factor for the brutal policy response. The drug war in the United States has constantly exposed large amounts to criminalization,
Spain had confidence that their culture was superior than any other beliefs. If anybody didn’t accept their religion as that, then those people were uncivilized “heathens”. This was the reasoning that justified their colonization of the New World. The Spanish travelled to the New World with the primary goal of “saving” the Indians. By converting them to Christianity the Indians could gain freedom, according to them.
Two things that were extremely important to the basic societal functions of colonial American society were women and the church. Much different from today’s world, woman’s main purpose in this society was to give birth to children and provide dowries to their husbands at marriage. The church was obviously there to provide a moral compass and rule to the people of this age. How do women and the church relate however? The relationship between these figures however is important to understanding how colonial Latin America worked especially when we discuss marriage and social standing.
The Rich people were able to live in luxury houses built of sun-dried brick. Their homes were coated of whitewash to make their house shine. The rich had built-in steam baths. They took a steam bath every day. Their clothes had “special features”on them..
The most important social group in the Aztec society was the calpolli. This was a collection of families connected by blood or long association. The key positions in the military, state administration, judiciary, and priesthood were dominated by the nobility. Traders could become powerful and wealthy, but their prosperity was based on their class, and most citizens stayed farmers. There were limited opportunities for an individual to better their social position.
Spain’s empire was vast and held possessions in Europe, the Americas, Asia, and Africa for centuries. Even though the Spanish Empire lasted for many years, there are some important characteristics that defined it; I will name five characteristics that defined the Spanish Empire and what it was like to live there are, these include: the emphasis on religion that the Spanish crowns placed, the incorporation of other races as Spanish subjects, the opportunities for social mobility presented for some despite social stigma, the Hapsburgs’ soft politics and the changes brought by the Bourbons’ ascent to power, and the motives for Spanish Independence. To begin, the Spanish Empire placed a great importance on religion as seen through the creation of the Inquisition, whose primary purpose was to defend the Catholic faith, and further demonstrated by the empire’s justifications for their expansionist ideas. To illustrate, a Needlemaker in Tarragona, Spain was accused by his wife of being a Lutheran since he did not attend mass, cursed God and the church, among other things. Consequently, he had to present himself before the Inquisition, in order to get acquitted or receive an punishment.
They would have certain classes. Upper and common class. This made things very different for each class. The richer people did not receive worse punishments because they had money to not be tortured. Certain punishments were followed out for different crime.
Greece and India had belief systems that shared some common aspects. However, the two systems had many basic differences. Greece and India were more different, because Greece’s system was based in Humanism, while India’s was based in spiritualism. The Greeks emphasized the physical world, concentrating on what was right in front of them, things they could see and touch. The Indians believed in something beyond the physical world.
