ipl-logo

Stanford Prison Experiment

845 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Effects of stanford prison experiment on prisoners

How can the events in the Stanford Prison Experiment be explained by the theory of deindividuation.

Introduction
Stanford Prison Experiment is a famous psychological study conducted by Philip Zimbardo in 1971. The main purpose of the experiment was to study the effects of a prison environment on the behavior of ordinary people. An artificial prison was constructed in the basement of Stanford University. Twenty-four mentally healthy men agreed to participate in this experiment for 15$ per day and were assigned to the roles of either prisoners or guards. Zimbardo himself participated in the study in the role of superintendent with his research assistant as a warden. The experiment planned for two weeks was terminated after six days because …show more content…

According to Zimbardo 's theory of deindividuation (1969), such factors as anonymity and lowered sense of responsibility can promote deindividuation.
Several studies have been done to study the effects of deindividuation on one 's behavior. In an experiment by Zimbardo (1970) students administered twice as much electric shock to another person when wearing hoods and robes disguising their personality.
Diener et al (1976) manipulated the two variables (degree or anonymity and sense of responsibility) to measure dishonest behavior caused by deindividuation among children trick-or-treating during Halloween. The results indicated higher level of dishonesty among children who were deindividuated by not being asked about their names and places they come from as well as by not being responsible for their actions.
Another experiment by Zhong et al (2010) indicated a direct relationship between deindividuation by anonymity and selfish behavior. Participants of his study cheated more in an on-line dictator game when they wearing sunglasses than another group playing without …show more content…

According to the model, participants ' behavior was dictated by the social norms of the surrounding condition rather than personal ones.
Consequently, another factor promoting deindividuation is the decreased sense of responsibility for one 's behavior (Zimbardo, 1969, 1971, Diener et al, 1976). A good example of this factor would be the abusive measures taken by guards to punish prisoners for insubordinate behavior, for they were aware of the presence of a superintendent as a higher position (Zimbardo, 1971).

Conclusion
To sum up, the theory of deindividuation provides a clear explanation of the events of the Stanford Prison Experiment. It points out two factors (anonymity and a weakened sense of responsibility) that help to explain the behavior exhibited by the participants in both roles of guards and prisoners. Deindividuation of the prisoners was caused by the rules of the experiment, which included the replacement of prisoners ' names by code numbers, similar uniforms, wearing stockings on head and the realistic process of arresting participants.
In addition, Social Identity model of Deindividuation Effects helped explaining the state by the process of merging with the assigned role, which affected the behavior of all

Show More
Related
749 Words | 3 Pages

In Kyle Patrick Alvarez’s The Stanford Prison Experiment, 20 college aged boys are selected to play different roles in a simulated prison located within Stanford. This experiment was thought of and carried out by Philip Zimbardo, a professor of psychology. The boys, who were also students at Stanford, were randomly selected to be a guard or a prisoner. The prisoners were taken by real police officers to the Stanford jail. When the experiment started, most of the prisoners thought of the situation as it was intended to be, an experiment.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

In 1971, Philip Zimbardo set out to conduct an experiment to observe behavior as well as obedience. In Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment, many dispute whether it was obedience or merely conforming to their predesigned social roles of guards and prisoners that transpired throughout the experiment. Initially, the experiment was meant to test the roles people play in prison environment; Zimbardo was interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities of the guards, disposition, or had more to do with the prison environment. This phenomenon has been arguably known to possibly influencing the catastrophic similarities which occurred at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003.The

Read More
1676 Words | 7 Pages

After the experiment, the students who played the guards were interviewed and found to still be shocked by their behavior within the fake prison environment, unrecognising that side of them or that they were even capable of doing such evil and abusive

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

This experiment was conducted in Stanford University by Dr. Zimbardo. During this two week long session, Dr. Zimbardo had several volunteers agree to act as prisoners and as prison guards. The prisoners were told to wait in their houses while the guards were to set up the mock prison, a tactic used by Dr. Zimbardo to make them fit into their roles more. The official police apprehended the students assigned to the role of prisoner from their homes, took mug shots, fingerprinted them, and gave them dirty prison uniforms. The guards were given clean guard uniforms, sunglasses, and billy clubs borrowed from the police.

Read More
1254 Words | 6 Pages

Situational effects and personality come into conflict when discussing behavior. Personality is someone’s “usual pattern of behavior, feelings, and thoughts” (Twenge, 2017, p.20). It remains constant throughout different situations, but some situations can be stressful enough to make a person act out of character. The transition between a person’s normal personality and behavior to a more evil, sinister behavior fascinates a man named Philip Zimbardo, who conducted the infamous Zimbardo Prison Experiment, or Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE). Zimbardo is an American psychologist at Stanford University and the mastermind behind the 1971 Stanford Prison Experiment (The Story).

Read More
989 Words | 4 Pages

The Stanford jail experiment, which was carried out in 1971 by Phillip Zimbardo, was designed to examine the function of power in a prison environment. In a mock jail setting, subjects were randomly assigned to the roles of "prisoners" and "guards." The experiment was intended to run for two weeks but was discontinued after six days. In the Stanford experiment, a few ethical principles were not adhered to.

Read More
858 Words | 4 Pages

Normal People Behaving Evil The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment to see if normal people would change their behavior in a role-play as a prisoner or a prison guard. The experiment was conducted by Dr.Philip Zimbardo in 1973 at Stanford University that caused numerous amount of trauma to prisoners by prison guards in their role-playing position which forced Dr. Zimbardo to officially terminate the experiment six days after it was introduced. Due to the cruel aggressive behaviors from the guards, the experiment led to a question, "Do "normal" people have the capability of behaving badly?" The answer to that question is that most likely an individual who behave normally will have the capability of expressing evil behavior due to the environment that they are surrounded.

Read More
1572 Words | 7 Pages

When a Catholic priest came to the site of the experiment the researchers noticed, “He interviewed each of the prisoners individually as I watched in amazement as half the prisoners he spoke to, when he introduced himself, responded by giving their numbers rather than their name.” (Stanford Narrative 11). This is important because this shows that given the situation a person is in, it could change the identity of the person itself. This is startling because given the situation of a prison a person could lose the freedom of identity. Where they are willing to give up their name and take the name or in this case their number that are given as their identification.

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

Zimbardo offered $15 per day for two weeks to take part in the experiment. The experiment was held in the basement of Stanford University Psychology building; they turned it into a mock prison. To begin the experiment Zimbardo interviewed over 70 applicants and done testing on each to eliminate candidates with psychological issues. Only 24 males were chosen to participate in the experiment.

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

Unit 1 Written Assignment Literature Review of article on Standard Prison Experiment Introduction This article concerns the Stanford Prison experiment carried out in 1971 at Stanford University. The experiment commenced on August 14, and was stopped after only six days. It is one of the most noted psychological experiments on authority versus subordinates. The studies which emerged from this have been of interest to those in prison and military fields due to its focus on the psychology associated with authority.

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

For example, one study testing the situational role in affecting behavior was done by Philip Zimbardo (1971) in the Stanford Prison Experiment where 22 males were selected depending on their social skills and mental

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

He is a selfish psychologist who just wanted to get a result. He did not realize that he is starting to act like a prison superintendent than a researcher. He only realizes it when Christina Maslach, objected the experiment after she saw that the prisoners were being harassed by the guards. Even if the study has received a lot of ethical criticism, the result still helps Zimbardo to make a conclusion that is helpful for his future endeavor in research.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

Picture in your mind a United States filled with safer citizens where lots of stores and banks worry less about the chance of robbery. This could happen if we allowed citizens the use of concealed handguns. I believe that since concealed handguns reduce crime, stop public shootings, and help people in times where law enforcement can't arrive soon enough, adults should have the right to own concealed handguns. One good reason is that allowing citizens to use concealed handguns reduces crime.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment: A Journey Into Authoritarian Leadership Over the years, scientists, psychologists, and doctors have used social experiments to further their understanding of our surroundings. Social experiments are studies of the human mind and psyche through various environments. In this case, a social experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment is what opened new doors for the comprehension of human behavior, how we act when we are in power, as well as offered a glimpse into the flaws in our legal system. This experiment was conducted in 1971 in Palo Alto, California.

Read More
1231 Words | 5 Pages

During this period, Zimbardo observed the radical change in the personalities of the participants embodying the role of the prison guard, as they changed from ordinary young men to men with a vicious and sadistic character. Zimbardo stated that he was trying to portray what transpired when all of the individuality and dignity was stripped away from a human, and their life was completely controlled. He wanted to demonstrate the dehumanization and loosening of social and moral values that can happen to guards immersed in such a situation (“Stanford Prison Experiment”). This experiment has been used to exemplify the cognitive dissonance theory and the power of authority. In addition, the findings advocate the situational explanation of behavior rather than the dispositional one.

Read More

More about Stanford Prison Experiment

Related Topics

Open Document