ipl-logo

The Stanford Prison Experiment: What Happens When Good People Turn Evil?

2212 Words9 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment What happens when good people turn evil? That was the question asked when Dr. Philip Zimbardo wanted to conduct a new experiment about just that. He wanted to show the world just how crazy people can get while given roles of authority. Never in a million years though, did he think that this study could become one of the most iconic experiments ever. This experiment basically let boys run wild and humiliate each other. Sadism and degradation play a big role in this study unintentionally. Understanding how good people turn evil may be hard to do before hearing about this experiment, but afterwards you won’t have to ask that question anymore. The Stanford Prison Experiment highlights what happens when humans get …show more content…

Prisoner #819 felt sick, refused to eat, and wanted more sleep so he was the only boy who chose not to speak with him. Zimbardo asked Guard Arnett to encourage #819 to take a few minutes to talk with the priest and eventually he agreed. Prisoner Stew-819, to say the least, looked terrible. He had dark circles under his eyes and uncombed hair going in what seemed every direction. That morning Stew-819 did a bad thing: during an outburst of rage, he messed up his cell, tearing open his pillow and throwing feathers everywhere. Like other inmates before, he was put in the Hole and his cellmates had to clean up the mess. During his chat with the priest he broke down and began to cry hysterically just as #8612 did. While trying to comfort him, Zimbardo let him take a time-out outside of the Yard. To reassure him Dr. Zimbardo said that he would get him some food and then take him to see a doctor, but #819 refused to leave, saying that he wants to carry on with the experiment. Dr. Zimbardo seems convinced enough and leaves the room to let Stew-819 rest for a little bit. When he was walking back to his office he heard an eruption coming from the Yard. Guard Arnett made the prisoners line up and had them chant “Prisoner 819 did a bad thing”, “Prisoner 819 is being punished”, “Because of the bad things that Prisoner 819 did, my cell is a mess.” When Zimbardo heard this he rushed back to the room that #819 was in and found him “hunched over into a quivering mass, hysterical.” (Zimbardo 107) while in the background his fellow inmates were yelling that he was a bad prisoner. Stew-819 refused to leave after Zimbardo suggested it; he said that he couldn’t leave because the other prisoners labeled him a bad prisoner. At this point Zimbardo said “Listen carefully to me, now, you’re not 819. You are Stewart, and my name is Dr. Zimbardo. I am a psychologist, not a prison superintendent, and

Show More
Related

Three Generation Of Punishment, By Anderson Cooper

276 Words | 2 Pages

This reveals that the prison camp was unjust when dealing with punishments. If someone found out about someone escaping, they would immediately report it because it was "just" according to the rules of the prison camp and they do not want to get

Read More

Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo

417 Words | 2 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment was a research study administered by Philip Zimbardo in 1971, which gathered twenty-four men to be put into a pseudo-jail to see the impacts of prison on the guards and inmates. Twelve of these volunteers were randomly selected to be inmates and the other twelve became guards. Not surprisingly, the inmates endured incredible torment and a few of them had psychological collapses due to severe emotional distress. The guards were consumed with their own power and felt little sympathy for the inmates that were under their care and stripped them, whipped them, dehumanized them. The research was expected to keep going for two weeks; however it went on for only six days due to the inmates encountering damaging levels

Read More

Stanford Prison Experiment Essay

458 Words | 2 Pages

Before the experiment began, all participants went through a psychological evaluation to make sure they were of sound mind (Onishi & Herbert, 2016). Once the experiment began the “prisoners” were arrested and taken to a simulated prison where they were stripped searched and demoralized. During the 6 days that the study lasted, conduct between both sides, prisoners and guards, was less than expectable. Both sides “acted as though a punishment was justified as an acceptable response to a breach of the rules” (Onishi & Herbert, 2016), rules that were vaguely explained.

Read More

Brief Summary Of The Video 'The Stanford Prison Experiment'

364 Words | 2 Pages

I watched the Stanford Prison Experiment video. After watching the video, I was amazed at what the participants went through mentally in such a short time. I was shocked by how the prisoners accepted this as a reality, like it was actually prison. I was especially interested in the student that played the role of a prison guard that was nicknamed John Wayne. It seemed very strange to me that he willingly harassed and eventually tortured the participants playing the role of prisoners.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment

810 Words | 4 Pages

This experiment was conducted in Stanford University by Dr. Zimbardo. During this two week long session, Dr. Zimbardo had several volunteers agree to act as prisoners and as prison guards. The prisoners were told to wait in their houses while the guards were to set up the mock prison, a tactic used by Dr. Zimbardo to make them fit into their roles more. The official police apprehended the students assigned to the role of prisoner from their homes, took mug shots, fingerprinted them, and gave them dirty prison uniforms. The guards were given clean guard uniforms, sunglasses, and billy clubs borrowed from the police.

Read More

Zimbardo Prison Ethical Summary

1160 Words | 5 Pages

He began to cry hysterically and was clearly disturbed. He was instead sent to a different room. In my opinion, he should have been dismissed from this project at this time. Inmates immediately began chanting and verbally abusing the inmate. Prisoner #819 continued to cry but was then comforted by Zimbardo, who finally dismissed him from the experiment, clearly many hours too late.

Read More

Is Annie's Identity In The Book Of The Dead By Edwidge Danticat

614 Words | 3 Pages

The Stanford Prison experiment, conducted in 1971, studied the psychology of the prisoner/prison guard relationship by randomly assigning college male volunteers as prisoners or prison guards. The prison guards received no training, but they became ruthless; they chained the prisoners’ legs together and put bags over their heads on bathroom runs, took away their clothes, beds, and showers as a form of punishment, and even limited their eating (Zimbardo). The behavior became so extreme that this two-week experiment was shut down after six days. The lesson learned was that when regular people are given too much power, they transform into oppressors (Konnikova). This was seen in the case of Annie’s father; he was given power over others and he turned into an abuser of this power and tortured the

Read More

The Purpose Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

373 Words | 2 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment took place forty years ago, led by psychologist Philip Zimbardo. Although the purpose of this experiment was to explore the impact of systems and situations on human’s behaviors, it resulted in severe harm in mental health and ethical concerns. Harm caused by the study: Since the participants are assigned into two groups as prisoners and prison wardens in the study, the prison wardens thought that they had to play in an authoritative role and did sadistic behaviors. It resulted in mental breakdowns and emotional harm to the prisoners. They used various tortures such as stripping naked and interrupting sleep to the prisoners.

Read More

Human Nature In Lord Of The Flies

1520 Words | 7 Pages

Only a couple of hours in, the guards are already harassing and punishing the prisoners with punishments that get worse and worse, some of the reasons that the prisoners are being punished are not even bad, but they still get cruel punishments. The guards are hurting the prisoners, who are actually their classmate and friends, and finding it amusing, showing off the evil human nature in them. The punishments are physical at first but as time goes on they start abusing there mental stability as well, “Next, the guards broke into each cell, stripped the prisoners naked and took the beds out. Soon #8612 “began to act ‘crazy,’ to scream, to curse, to go into a rage that seemed out of control.” It wasn’t until this point that the psychologists realized they had to let him out…

Read More

The Stanford Prison Experiment

1659 Words | 7 Pages

The men who agreed to be prisoners in the experiment were treated as real life criminals. To make it as realistic as possible the men were arrested in their homes at random times without warning. They were taken to the local police station where they were fingerprinted, and had their photograph taken and put into police records. They were then blindfolded and taken to Stanford

Read More

Prison Experiment Review

978 Words | 4 Pages

The Stanford Prisoner Experiment Review PSYC 1111 – University of the People The Stanford Prison Experiment was an infamous psychological experiment conducted in the early 1970s by Dr. Philip Zimbardo. He sought to find an explanation for the dehumanizing, deplorable conditions found in many prisons. Psychological theories at the time were based on a dispositional hypothesis in which it was the natural disposition of the guards and prisoners from before they even entered the environment that lead to the behaviours that caused these poor conditions. This experiment was designed to challenge these theories by removing the possible effects of disposition while emulating as closely as possible all other aspects of a prison environment.

Read More

Was Zimbardo Justified In The Stanford Prison Experiment

846 Words | 4 Pages

Zimbardo continued the experiment, while sitting back and watching what would happen next. The experiment’s purpose was to see human’s responses to captivity in a prison-life

Read More

What Are The Psychological Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

1003 Words | 5 Pages

As for the guards they were told they didn't have to stay on site after their shift was over. After it all the guards were just become completely different people. For example, complete different attitudes, they did not have any respect or sympathy for any of the other “prisoners”. As the days went on the guards became animals. Finally at one point one of the guards had snapped at one of the prisoners and had assaulted him with the wooden bottoms they were given by the researchers.after that point the experiment had to be ended after just 6

Read More

Social Influence On Social Psychology

949 Words | 4 Pages

The Guards (3 per shift), met the prisoners in guard uniforms with sunglasses and a baton, stripping the prisoners of their identities and introducing them to their new assigned numbers. Reports show the first day was uneventful, but by day two the prisoners began to disobey and discuss riot and the guards planned psychological actions to keep the prisoners under control (cite). By day six, the participates had been fully engulfed in their roles, even Zimbardo himself saw blurred lines on what reality was. The Guards had found their power, psychologically torturing the prisoners and the prisoners believed they were in prison and could not leave and had no free will although 2 prisoner participates left the study due to the psychological nature of the experiment

Read More

Social Influence: Conformity, Compliance, And Obedience

879 Words | 4 Pages

Zimbardo wanted this experiment to be as real as real-life. He instructed the guards to do whatever they think necessary in order to maintain law and order in the prison (Zimbardo, 2015). “Prisoners were treated like every other criminal, being arrested at their own homes, without warning, and taken to the local police station” although physical violence was not allowed (McLeod, 2017). What Zimbardo found was that within a short amount of time all the participants adopted to their roles easily. The experiment demonstrated how people will comply with the expectations that come from certain social roles.

Read More

More about The Stanford Prison Experiment: What Happens When Good People Turn Evil?

Related Topics

Open Document