In the article, “The Bernie Bomb”, the tones of abhorrence and antagonism shows affirmation in most of the article. The author’s, Kimberley Strassel, message she is conveying is that Bernie Sanders is not an acceptable President, not only that, but, the Strassel insults Sanders by saying that whoever donated to him should ask for a refund. The diction used relates to the tone of the passage, how Strassel phrases it is able to convey a very negative tone. For instance, Strassel calls Sanders a “lazy debater” who “happens to be stunningly unprepared” for the debate and how he “stumbled through all this with incoherent meditations.”
Nick Flynn spends a large majority of his memoir, The Ticking is the Bomb, reflecting on both the Abu Ghraib prison scandal of 2004-2005 and his impending fatherhood, seemingly placing two incompatible ideas side by side. At first glance, the memoir seems disjointed and causes the reader to question why Flynn would choose to write about parenthood alongside depictions of torture. Close examination of the text, however, reveals Flynn’s complex and nuanced worldview. Flynn finds torture to be reprehensible, and a significant portion of the memoir is devoted to coming to terms with the fact that he had shaken hands with known torture-advocate Sam Harris. Perhaps he does not wish to raise his daughter in a world where scandals like Abu Ghraib
Document Based Assignment 2 On September 11, 2001 terrorists attacked our country causing one of the most devastating events in United States history. Islamic extremists seized control of four airplanes, crashing two of them into the Twin Towers, one into the Pentagon, and the last in Pennsylvania. Overall they killed 3,000 people and another 6,000 were terribly injured.9/11 is a day the U.S. will never forget, paying respect every year to all those who sadly died. There are many clues leading up to this incident showing Osama Bin Laden’s hatred towards the U.S. and the Americans reaction to him.
A great terror struck our nation September 11, 2001, two aircraft’s hit the world trade centers, killing 2000 people and injuring over twice as many. A third aircraft flew into the Pentagon while a fourth crashed in a rural area in Pennsylvania. This day will forever be engrained into history as one of the worst terror attacks faced in this nation. Nearly three years later, in an attempt to figure out what happened on that tragic day, scholars came together to discuss the possible parallels between foreign and domestic terrorist. The author, Michael Kimmel, outlines the possible cause of the 2001 attacks and offers us a link between both foreign and domestic terrorism.
September 11th, 2001, left a devastating impact on not only the United States, but worldwide. Many families had been separated and many souls were lost in what was one of the most terroristic events that has ever happened on American ground. As two planes crashed into the Twin Towers located in New York, thousands of people would be left stuck in the crumbling building, some able to escape, while others were not as lucky. In an essay by Peter Bergen called “Could it Happen Again? In the National Interest”, Bergen highlights inside details of the fatal attack and what caused Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda to reign its terror on the Twin Towers.
In 1945, Japan was losing World War Two, but was split between surrendering or fighting till the end. As they chose to fight instead of surrender, that is when Harry Truman was notified about the successful test of the “most terrible bomb in history”. Multiple hours were spent doing research, and billions of dollars were used for its production. Since an atomic bomb is serious the heat released in a nuclear explosion creates a sphere of burning gas that can range from hundreds of feet. Since Harry Truman was president at the time it was his decision whether or not he was going to use the bomb to end the war.
The Most Dangerous Game Analyzed Conflicts can be difficult for the people involved in them, but can a conflict also have a positive outcome? Yes , because anything can happen in a story, and that's why the I’ve read relates to this. We will analyze the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell and how the author uses Internal Conflict or man vs himself, Internal Conflict or man vs man, and Internal Conflict or man vs nature. At the beginning of the story Rainsford finds out a man named Zaroff lives on an island where he hunts humans and later on wants to hunt him. According to the text on page 19, Rainsford was hiding in a tree.
Was America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.
During WWII there were many deaths and terrible battles but the worst of all of them was America dropping the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This tactic of bombing a city was the wrong decision by America, it was completely barbaric and was an act of total war something no country should ever use. The main issues with this decision was that it wasn’t an attack on a military base like Pearl Harbor but it was an attack on a populated city and Japan was prepared to surrender because they knew America and the Allied Powers would win the war. The main argument others have is that the Atomic bomb saved lives by creating a fast end to the war so it wouldn’t be strung out resulting in more deaths on both sides but Japan was prepared to surrender
Intimidation to the brim On August 1945, America dropped an atomic bomb on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The explosion over Hiroshima wiped out 95 percent of the city and killed 80,000 people. Thousands more would die of radiation exposure. Two days later an atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, killing an estimated 50,000 people.
Non-state actors attempt to attack the U.S. and recruit U.S. citizens to participate in attacks against our homeland without warning. The prospect of terrorist attacks on our homeland from non-state actors or our own radicalized homegrown terrorists has increased a
Countries and Terrorism British Prime Minister ,Tony Blair,in his speech,following September 11,2001, acknowledges terrorism during and after September 11,2001 occured. Blair’s speech is to emphasize how countries will come together and fight against terrorism or any object that will try to take us down. Blair’s speech was effective in persuading American’s to overcome tragedies because of pathos,parallelism,and connotation. Blair uses pathos in his speech and is talking about how people are more protecting of nations from crisis in the world also casts on how people are more interpendent than ever. American’s who are willing to sacrifice for America is really blessed.
" Everyday Use," by Alice Walker which is a short story that is told in first person (narrator) by "Mama". The main events (plot) of this short story is about personality and talks about heritage. A old fashion woman who label herself as a large, big boned woman with manly hands , and have qualities of a man . She has two daughters who names are Maggie and Dee. The two sisters are not alike in so many ways.
“To Catch a Bombmaker” written by Clay Dillow was featured in the November 2015 issue of Popular Science, a magazine that publishes articles on science and technology. It was informative yet easy to read but could also be entertaining, for those who enjoy reading about scientific projects/happenings. It is important for an author to make their article an enjoyable to read. However, a writer’s purpose is to inform, persuade, or entertain. For example, Dillow’s purpose was inform; he succeeded in informing readers.
Eric Arthur Blair, more commonly known as George Orwell, uses his literary prose as an essayist to inform the world of the greater dangers of the Atomic Bomb. Orwell explains in “You and the Atomic Bomb,” written on October 19, 1945 in the Tribune, the possible political and social implications of the new technology. Orwell introduces the topic by stating common thoughts that the common man shares such as how difficult these bombs are to manufacture and how wide the technology has spread. The English essayist transitions to state how massive and expensive weapons give power to few and innovation on a smaller, cheaper scale disperses power to the people. These weapons have developed through the ages, such as the musket during the American and
