The Warren Commission Report

The following report will attempt to investigate John Fitzgerald Kennedy’s assassination to the extent to which the Warren Commission report adequately explains the nature of the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. This report discusses a circumstance of about fifty two years ago, where a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald shot the president of America John Fitzgerald Kennedy. It also discusses the circumstances and causes of the death of JFK, the identity of the assassin and the motivations of the perpetrator who committed this act on November 22, 1963.

The Warren Commission report accurately explains the cause of JFK’s death to be the result of a fatal head wound caused by a rifle from the Texas School Book Depository. On the

After a terrible childhood , Lee Harvey Oswald registered at the age of seventeen in the US marines, where he became attracted in communism . In 1959 he went over to the Soviet Union, married a Russian wife, Marina. Oswald was dissatisfied with the Soviet system, and in 1962 he went back to the USA, and from there he had also made numerous despairing tries to go to Cuba. Marina claims that, ‘He was the kind of person who was never able to get along anywhere he was.’ Asked why Lee might have wanted to kill the president, Marina said ‘He wanted in any way, whether good or bad, to do something that would make him outstanding, that he would be known in history.’ Marina had also made an allegation that Oswald had intended to assassinate Richard Nixon. A home-based film by Robert Hughes, showed more of the east side of the sixth floor window while the president’s car went passed straight beneath, not at all more than five seconds before the shooting had even started. Three of the employees in the fifth floor window are clearly noticeable; however, there appears to be certainly not one person in the sixth floor window. Furthermore, another eye-witness, Charles Bronson, videoed the window initially six minutes before, at around the

The fact that the Warren Commission worked from the statement that Oswald was guilty does certainly not declare the possibility that Oswald was actually guilty. The evidence, however, suggests otherwise. The majority of the 900–page Report was keen on a biography of Oswald, it was determined to display Oswald as being skillful, and undertaking what he was wanted to do. Apparently, however, Oswald was moved via a significant hostility to his environment. He doesn’t seem to have been capable of establishing expressive relationships with other people. He was continuously dissatisfied with the world around him. Years before the assassination he conveyed his hate for the American society and went into protest against it. Oswald's exploration for what he considered to be the flawless society was hopeless from the beginning. He wanted a position for himself in history and a role as the "great man" who would be known as being different for his time. His duty to Marxism and communism seems to have been an alternative influence for his motivation. He also had revealed a capacity to act authoritatively and without esteem to the costs when such accomplishment would further his ambitions of the instant. Out of these and the many additional influences that might possibly have built the character of Lee Harvey Oswald there appeared a man skillful enough of assassinating President