ipl-logo

There Are The Key Differences Between Monotheism And Polytheism

1363 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Monotheism vs polytheism essay

Learning Journal
University of the People
PHIL 1402: Introduction to Philosophy
Instructor: Luis Teixeira
26 April 2023

1. What are the key differences between monotheism and polytheism?
Monotheism and polytheism are two different approaches to the concept of God or gods. Monotheism refers to the belief in a single, all-powerful deity, while polytheism refers to the belief in many gods and goddesses.
One of the key differences between monotheism and polytheism is the nature of God or gods. In mon-otheism, God is typically viewed as a transcendent, all-knowing, and all-powerful being who created and sustains the universe. In polytheism, gods and goddesses are often viewed as having specific roles and responsibilities in the world, …show more content…

The main argument would be the lack of empirical evidence for their existence. While many people believe in gods and offer arguments for their existence, there is no empirical evidence to support these claims. In the absence of empirical evidence, some individ-uals and schools of thought argue that it is more reasonable to conclude that there are no gods.
2. Do you think there are good arguments explaining why a purely good God would allow bad things to happen to good people?
The problem of evil is one of the most significant challenges to the belief in a purely good God. The argument goes that if God is all-powerful and all-good, then He should be able and willing to prevent evil and suffering in the world. However, since evil and suffering do exist, either God is not all-powerful, or He is not all-good, or He simply does not exist (Tooley 2021).
There are different ways to approach this problem. One possible response is to argue that God allows evil and suffering for some greater good. This is the so-called "greater good" theodicy. The idea is that God permits evil and suffering in the world because it serves a higher purpose, such as the pro-motion of moral character or the development of virtues like compassion and …show more content…

His belief in God was based on reason and observation, rather than revelation or tradi-tion. Paine also believed in the immortality of the soul, but rejected the idea of eternal damnation or reward. As a humanist, he emphasized the importance of reason, science, and democracy, as well as the fundamental dignity and worth of all human beings. While humanism is generally compatible with religious beliefs that align with humanist values, conflicts may arise when religious beliefs in-volve supernatural claims or dogma that conflict with reason and

Show More
Related
1239 Words | 5 Pages

In polytheism, there are many gods to worship. Having many gods helps explain certain events that are unknown by creating myths. Polytheism was the majority of the population so it was quite easy to follow. Being polytheistic benefited the Assyrians because they were easy to conquer and add gods such as Ashur, a militant sun god. Monotheism wasn’t followed widely and was set apart from everyone else which made them unique.

Read More
1272 Words | 6 Pages

“The Problem of Evil” by Peter van Inwagen, is a series of lectures that that presents van Inwagen’s various responses to problem of evil. In this essay, I will present “the local problem of evil” (from chapter 6 of the book), the solution van Inwagen proposes for this problem, and my critique of his solution. “The local problem of evil,” according to van Inwagen, is the hypothetical response an atheist would have towards van Inwagen’s solution of “the global problem of evil” which is, “If god existed, then why is there so much evil in the world?” The argument of “the local problem of evil” is “If god existed then why are there specific horrors that occur in the world, like children dying in a horrific car crash?” The argument that is drawn

Read More
1706 Words | 7 Pages

And since it is obvious there are clearly horrible things happening in the world, God does not exist. And the possibility that the evil occurs for a higher purpose of achieving a greater good is

Read More
1614 Words | 7 Pages

Benjamin Richardson Mr. Cook English III Honors 21 April 2024 The Great Gatsby, Homegoing, and the American Dream The Great Gatsby, published in 1925, follows the adventures of Nick Carraway after he moved next to a strange man named Jay Gatsby. This book not only criticizes the rich class, but also attacks the American Dream. Another book with a similar message is Yaa Gyasi’s Homegoing.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

Facing reality is like seeing a delicious cake, finally taking a bite out of it, and realizing it tastes like cardboard. In To Kill A Mockingbird, the harsh reality is, people lie. “No I don’t recollect if he hit me. I mean yes I do, he hit me” (Lee 245). Under oath, Mayella knows what she says and doesn’t say affects the outcome of the trial.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

“Do you see this son, it’s all madness out there. I just don’t understand why God lets this happens.” As my mother watches the 11 pm news on a cold rainy night, most of the coverage is about evil acts and how it’s affecting the community of Los Angles. Thus, it raises the question of why a God who is omniscient, omnipotent, and benevolent would allow evil and suffering to exist in the world. This paper explores the argument of the problem of evil conflicts with the existence of God from two different points of view, criticism of one point of view, and evaluation of the argument.

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

Questioning if God is not omnipotent, the entire idea of God creating the world can be called into question. Another issue is that if it is said that God is no longer entirely good there is the possibility to say that God has evil or bad intentions, and we should denounce him. Lastly, if one says that evil does not exist, then there is no possible way to separate those people who are considered to be deviants of society. This would mean that those who commit crimes that are evil in nature like murder and rape would be considered to be normal and acceptable.

Read More
643 Words | 3 Pages

The deductive problem of evil defines omnipotence as having no bounds to power and being all-good as having the will to prevent and stop any evil that one possibly can. Furthermore, Adams presents how much this problem is amplified when considering horrendous evils that would push the average person to “doubt the positive meaning of their lives”(Adams 300). Adams acknowledges that this definition of God’s qualities alongside the definition of horrendous evils hinders the existence of the Christian God. God is one who is supposed to hold love for all of his creations, but allowing for his creations to suffer needlessly doesn’t align with this love. This problem causes people to question not only God’s love for them but also God’s reasoning in their suffering and their living.

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

Define polytheism. Polytheism is the belief in more than one

Read More
1397 Words | 6 Pages

For years, many have questioned G-d’s role when it comes to addressing the problem of evil. Why is it that bad things always happen to the best of people? Oftentimes, we find ourselves wondering how an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good divinity could allow for such atrocities to occur, such as the Holocaust and the enslavement of millions. G-d’s role and existence surrounding the problem of evil is most often debated by philosophers and theologians alike such as English philosopher, John Hick. Hick introduces a consoling outlook to why such atrocities exist, framing G-d’s role and reasoning for evil's existence as a way for us to learn, grow, and better our souls.

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

Even though they’re so many gods, individuals usually have a stronger connection to a particular god of their choosing, and not to every single god. Each Hindus religious path is a little bit different. I don’t think one could classify Hinduism in a way that would universalize whether it is a polytheistic or monotheistic religion. All gods in this religion are smaller deities to the greater Brahman, making this monotheistic, but then it is also polytheistic because there is truly the supreme belief in one major God. Hinduism only seems hard to understand because it deals more with one’s life then ones actual practice or belief of the religion.

Read More
2349 Words | 10 Pages

The problem of evil takes into account three defining features of God: all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful and questions whether such a God would permit evil and not interfere. Sinnott-Armstrong discusses his stance by countering responses he coins as the Glorious Response, the Modest Response, and the Overriding Response. Whereas, Craig counters the arguments made by Sinnott-Armstrong. The Glorious Response Thus response suggests evil is

Read More
1563 Words | 7 Pages

There are also moral differences. Monotheistic people believe in absolute truth. They believe they were put on Earth for a specific purpose. They want to fulfill this purpose, and they will do anything to fulfill this purpose so that they can achieve eternal salvation. Polytheistic people, however, believe that they should have more freedom in how they worship.

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

A lot of arguments have been known to prove or disprove the existence of God, and the Problem of Evil is one of them. The Problem of Evil argues that it is impossible to have God and evil existing in the same world. Due to ideal characteristics of God, evil should not have a chance to exist and make human suffer. In this essay, I will examine the argument for the Problem of Evil, a possible theodicy against the argument, and reply to the theodicy. First of all, to be clear, the Problem of Evil is an argument that shows that God cannot be either all- powerful, all-knowing, and/or all good.

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

In all these religions, God is the supreme-being whose power is never questionable (Fisher 247). However, there are different views on the monotheistic God from each of these religions. For example, Zoroastrianism views God as the source of good and not evil at any single instance. On the contrary, Judaists and Christians see God as the source of both evil and good. Moreover, the recognition of God as monotheistic was founded on the revelation key prophets received in each faith.

Read More

More about There Are The Key Differences Between Monotheism And Polytheism

Related Topics

Open Document