ipl-logo

Thomas Hobbes 'View Of René Descartes' Meditations On First Philosophy

723 Words3 Pages

After reading each philosopher's ideas and justifications, I agree with Hobbes' view, because of Descartes' obscured and flawed rational system. In 1641, René Descartes published Meditations on First Philosophy in an effort to establish what is true with absolute certainty. The book is made out of six chapters, one for each day of Descartes' meditation to establish absolute certainty of what is known. Some main topics include: the senses, the mind, the body, the belief of God, and material things. Descartes main objective in the First Meditation is to doubt all of his previous knowledge and “attack straightaway those principles which supported everything [he] once believed” (Descartes, 60). Once completed, Descartes believes he will find the …show more content…

With the fear that what he sees is false, Descartes decides to doubt all his senses and rely on one simple fact he knows to be true: “I am, I exist” (Descartes, 64). Since the belief was not affected by the skepticism and he cannot exist without a thought and mind, he accepts that he is a “thinking thing” (Descartes 65). Descartes defines “thinking” as imagining, understanding, doubting, and sensing. To determine if he has a body, Descartes uses the Cartesian Dualism to describe the relationship between mind and body. We cannot be sure we have a body; Descartes can be sure that we have a mind. Descartes completes this chapter determining that perceiving is not possible without a mind, the mind’s existence is definite, and most importantly the mind and body are two separate and distinct …show more content…

At first, he scrutinizes Hobbes' confusion because Descartes feels that “[he had] said this so explicitly and in so many places, that there seems to be no room for doubt”. Descartes is reacting to Hobbes' rejection of the words, “that is, a mind, a soul, an understanding, a reason” (Third Replies: CSM II 123). Another way Descartes explains how Hobbes is interpreting his words wrong is the comparison with thinking and walking. This is an incorrect comparison because walking is understood as only the action, while thought can refer to either the action or the thing possessing the

Show More
Related
500 Words | 2 Pages

Descartes believed we experience things through are senses and that everything we think exists is only through our belief. He came up with “ I think therefore I am”. He determined that only things he could accept were those that his mind proved to be reason and true. In doing the experiment, I could hear the hum of my computer, my grandmother talking on the phone, and my dog barking.

Read More
1654 Words | 7 Pages

Notre Dame ID: 902008117 In René Descartes ' Mediations on First Philosophy, Descartes abandons all previous notions or things that he holds to be true and attempts to reason through his beliefs to find the things that he can truly know without a doubt. In his first two meditations Descartes comes to the conclusion that all that he can truly know is that he exists, and that he is a thinking being. In his third meditation, Descartes concludes that he came to know his existence, and the fact that he is a thinking being, from his clear and distinct perception of these two facts. Descartes then argues that if his clear and distinct perception would turn out to be false, then his clear and distinct perception that he was a thinking being would not have been enough to make him certain of it (Blanchette).

Read More
1054 Words | 5 Pages

Descartes did not explain how the mind and body interact with each other. One point brought up by Descartes was the material body and an immaterial mind. When I asked how the mind and body interact in this situation he just said, “they are united”. I felt that Descartes did not make a strong enough argument to help clarify this point to me. Ryle’s was able to persuade me in his direction after presenting his argument.

Read More
1919 Words | 8 Pages

In the sixth meditation, Descartes postulates that there exists a fundamental difference in the natures of both mind and body which necessitates that they be considered as separate and distinct entities, rather than one stemming from the other or vice versa. This essay will endeavour to provide a critical objection to Descartes’ conception of the nature of mind and body and will then further commit to elucidating a suitably Cartesian-esque response to the same objection. (Descartes,1641) In the sixth meditation Descartes approaches this point of dualism between mind and matter, which would become a famous axiom in his body of philosophical work, in numerous ways. To wit Descartes postulates that he has clear and distinct perceptions of both

Read More
243 Words | 1 Pages

Shasta is a curious, careful, and accommodating boy that constantly dreams about a future more than manual labor. Shasta, a young boy found abandoned in a boat as a child, has grown up in a small fishing community that is known for being indifferent to the outside world. While he does not mind working for his abusive father, he is constantly curious about what else life might have in store for him. Inside, however, Shasta is thirsting for his father’s approval; thirsting for kindness and willing to do anything for it. Wishing to fulfill this hunger, Shasta is forced to either willingly leave with a Tarkaan slaver or to flee on the back of the Tarkaan’s horse, Bree.

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

Though the two worked towards a philosophic development in modern political thought, their points of view are opposing on most accounts. In this paper, I will compare and contrast the viewpoints on state of nature of both Locke and Hobbes, which

Read More
1465 Words | 6 Pages

Leaving aside Descartes’ skepticism of the existence of everything, Frankfurt argues that Descartes’ ‘metaphysical doubt concerns simply the possibility that the demon victimizes us by making us think we remember clearly and distinctly perceiving what we in fact never clearly and distinctly perceived at all’ (217). Human beings rely on their senses to perceive the things around them. Through some complex processes that occur in the human’s mind, that we like to call thinking, humans are able to identify and make connections for themselves, for what is out there and what isn’t. Discussing Descartes’ works, Frankfurt acknowledges that Descartes’ thought might not be his only fundamental characteristic, ‘even though he perceives clearly and distinctly that it is, because he is not yet altogether convinced that what is clearly and distinctly perceived is true’ (161). Furthermore, Frankfurt adds that Descartes ‘does perceive clearly and distinctly that thought is his essence’, but he restricts the assertion because ‘he still fears the demon’ (161).

Read More
301 Words | 2 Pages

According to Tom Sorell, the Professor of Politics and Philosophy at Warwick University, “Hobbes served the family and their associates as translator, traveling companion, keeper of accounts, business representative, political adviser, and scientific collaborator”(Sorell). Hobbes first well-known philosophical writings

Read More
1476 Words | 6 Pages

Descartes presents an argument for how we know that we exist. It is difficult to question something we don’t know because we don’t know where to start. If there is an answer, there is a question, however if humans do not exist, there would be no one to question their existence. On the topic of existence, Descartes claims that he cannot be misinformed about his own existence, and that he is a thinking thing. Everything exists both through imagination and through reality.

Read More
1520 Words | 7 Pages

In his Sixth Meditation, Descartes argues that (1) mind and body are distinct, and (2) mind and body form a union, in which the mind and body can interact with each other. To better understand a union, take the example of ‘3 meters’: a measurement, i.e., union, formed from the number ‘3’ and the unit ‘meter’. Descartes argues in his Second Meditation that he can conceive of a mind as essentially a thinking thing, not an extended thing. Thus, he argues that a mind can exist without being extended, since extension is not in the essence of a mind. Similarly, he argues in his Fifth Meditation that he can conceive of a body as essentially an extended thing, not a thinking thing.

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

Question No. 10 Answer: The furthest point of Hobbes' state of nature is embodied as the war of each man against each man. This one line aggregates up the seriousness of the situation introduced by Hobbes and illuminates why the life of man must be terrible, brutish and short. This position of Hobbes is landed at systematically that maybe makes him the father of political science. Regarding human organization Hobbes saw movement as creating enjoyment or displeasure inside of us.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

In his philosophical thesis, of the ‘Mind-Body dualism’ Rene Descartes argues that the mind and the body are really distinct, one of the most deepest and long lasting legacies. Perhaps the strongest argument that Descartes gives for his claim is that the non extended thinking thing like the Mind cannot exist without the extended non thinking thing like the Body. Since they both are substances, and are completely different from each other. This paper will present his thesis in detail and also how his claim is critiqued by two of his successors concluding with a personal stand.

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout his life Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) was known as a ‘man of letters’, his first published work was on the translation of Thucydides (1629). He spent much of his time on mathematical problems, striving to square the circle, getting into controversy with John Wallis and other major mathematicians of his day. He was associated with Francis Bacon even translating some of his work. Influenced by the thought of Galileo, he also read Descartes ‘Mediations’ and wrote ‘objections which Descartes published with his answers as an appendix to his work. All his diverse literary and intellectual accomplishments are outshined by his contribution to the history of philosophy which is the system of social and political philosophy.

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

CSM I, 99), Descartes suggests that the our bodies (human body) are composed of a soul and a body. However, Descartes finds necessary to provide a description of the soul and the body individually to better understand how these join and unite ‘to constitute men who resemble us’ (L’homme). In this case, Descartes seems to create a scenario where the body possesses all its functions, but does not possess rationality (Normore). For the body, Descartes describes it as a ‘statute or machine made of earth’ that is created by God in the image of human beings, externally and internally. In the external side of the body, God creates the body with the same colors and shapes of all the parts of the human body.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

When I try to conceive of the self, I do not think of the mind but bodily behaviour, i.e. physical displays of anger. If we cannot gain an impression of the mind, then we cannot possess an idea of the self. The assertion that Descartes has a clear and distinct perception that he is “... a thinking thing” is therefore made redundant and his conceivability argument is

Read More

More about Thomas Hobbes 'View Of René Descartes' Meditations On First Philosophy

Related Topics

Open Document