Thomas Paine Pros And Cons

754 Words4 Pages

Thomas Paine’s pamphlet, Common Sense Thomas Paine was born and raised in England. Benjamin Franklin pushed Paine to go to America where a revolution was believed to be starting. Paine packed up what little belongings he had and moved to the colonies where he immediately engaged himself in political activities. After the first battle of the Revolutionary War, Paine pushed the colonists through his anonymously written pamphlet, Common Sense, to declare independence from Britain. “In Common Sense, Paine addresses the problems of monarchy, the advisability of separation, the nature of society, and makes modest proposals for a new form of government” (Thomas Paine -- Common Sense -- Reading Revolutions). Paine used the comparison of people becoming …show more content…

Kings originated from sin, so the monarchy was a sin. This argument most likely won over many of the colonists. Paine goes on to recognize the argument that America has become a great country with the help of the British monarchy, but then says that Britain helped the colonies get started and their services are no longer useful to them. Another argument is that the colonies have been under the surveillance and care of Britain, but Paine fires back that they’ve started to attack rather than take care of the …show more content…

There are fifty-four verses in the Bible that reference being born in sin. Romans 3:10 states, “As it is written: “None is righteous, no, not one”. Because every man is born in sin and cannot go a day without sinning, the fact that the king is of a sin is irrelevant. Another position I would take is that Britain is bigger than the colonies. If the colonies were going to fight for full independence, it would take a lot more than they currently have. They would still be in debt to us, so either way they are still under our control if they were to achieve freedom. Without Britain, the colonies are nothing and won’t be able to survive. Especially not without the financial resources for