Robert Reich starts off his article by stating the idea that income inequality is necessary for an economy to function at is fullest because people need incentive to work hard and make it to the top. Once he gets into the section about what we need to do to fix this growing problem of the wealth gap he states that there is not any one thing that we can do to fix it rather there need to be multiple things to happen to fix it. The first way Reich says we can fix the economy for a smaller wealth gap is to raise the minimum wage to about 15 dollars an hours in industries that are growing very fast like fast-food and hospitals. These industries are making large amounts of money but they are paying their workers very little. His next step is to get
For every year that passes, it seems as though more and more people are beginning to lose their faith in the US government. Many have grown tired of being ignored by their representatives, while others are disgusted by the greed and corruption that appears to control every movement congress makes. In the blog, "The Disease of American Democracy," published in the Huffington Post, the author, Robert Reich, explores this very idea; however, instead of merely agreeing with the majority of the American public, Reich uses his blog to motivate Americans to once again become politically active, so as to restore the democracy that there once was in the US. Just like any other author, Reich certainly took his audience into much consideration. Reich
Kaitlyn Johnson English, 008 September 29, 2015 Inequality Inequality has been a major problem all over the world. Not just with race or gender, but now ones' income puts them aside from others. and they are catorgarized. Gary S. Becker, a Noble laurete in economics, and Kevin M. Murphy, a professor at the University of Chicago and a recipient of a 2005 MacCrthur "genius" fellowship, believe that a higher education equals higher income. Paul Krugmam, a teacher of economics at Princeton and the city University of New York, uses people who have had an impact on America.
Human rights, something that was written down for the world after the catastrophic second world war. Most know of the genocide of ethnic groups that were deemed inferior to Nazi Germany more specifically Jews, which were senselessly exterminated in camps such as Auschwitz and Birkenau. After the war the newly formed United Nations voted and passed The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in 1948, under this declaration lists thirty unalienable rights shared by all human beings. However, these rights can’t be actualized for everyone on the planet, both before and after the UDHR was written. The reasons being is that firstly, when people are pressed into a survival situation they are not thinking about the rights of everyone, but instead
Reading through RIP, the Middle Class: 1946-2013, it became fairly obvious that the author, Edward McClelland, was presenting a thesis idea that consisted of promoting the middle class through examples of its prime time when middle class thrived. McClelland made the point clearly as he repeatedly provided examples ranging from the glory days of the assembly line industry that had provided high paying jobs for many people, to presidents who attempted to keep business within the United States to promote home grown jobs. He was especially focused on the point that the middle class was shrinking due to a large discrepancy between the wealthy and the rest of society as capitalism achieves its goal of padding the wealthiest and keeping the middle
in Kenji Yoshino’s essay “The preface of the new civil rights”, he argues the problems of equality, covering, discrimination, and the legal system. One of the main problems that Yoshino covers in his essay is the ongoing problem of discrimination in the U.S. culture. Everyone feels discrimination in some form which causes everyone to cover. Covering is something people do to protect or conceal who they really are from society. According to Yoshino, the old civil rights is a legal change based on shared oppression whereas the new civil rights requires social change.
One theme of To Kill a Mockingbird, portrayed excellently by Harper Lee, is racism causes inequality. For example, when going to Calpurnia’s church, Scout and Jem quickly noticed that ‘“there [weren’t] any hymn-books’” (Lee 64). This relates back to the theme of racism causes inequality because most of the black people couldn’t read so hymn-books would have been useless. However, Scout and Jem, who were white children, could read and preferred using hymn-books.
In October 1935, Schultz insisted on putting a hit on Dewey, who was leading an all-out effort to put the mob out of business. The syndicate board overruled Schultz; they felt that killing law enforcement officers would bring too much heat. They feared – with good reason – that Dewey's murder would inflame public outrage to new heights and result in an even greater campaign to shut down the rackets. Schultz vowed that he would ignore the board's decision and kill Dewey himself.
In Robert Reich’s documentary “Inequality for All” he demonstrated a great balance of emotional and logical appeal, which resulted in getting his point across to the audience. Reich argued that America is a consumer-driven economy and for it to achieve the middleclass should have more purchasing power to keep the economy as strong as it once was. From the beginning of the documentary I began to trust him by examining that he has an honest and comedic personality. The part of the documentary that interest me the most was the comment that CEOs worry more how fat their pockets are rather than worry if they have enough employees and if those employees are paid correctly. Overall, I view Reich as someone who does not point fingers towards the
Robert Reich’s ‘Saving Capitalism’ Robert Reich’s concern with capitalism is that we may be coming too top heavy that capitalism cannot be sustained. This meaning these large corporations and wealthy individuals are controlling the market too much. It is only a matter of time before it all collapses. Robert Reich points out the reason why capitalism is declining in this country is because, the upper class is controlling the market, the middle class is shrinking, and wages have been stagnated for a couple decades.
The publisher of this article is very well know in reference to the affairs of the middle class, and would be considered creditable source. Contributor, G. (2013, October 24). The Rise And Fall Of The Middle Class In America. (SB, Ed.) Retrieved June 21, 2015, from Liberal America.org:
America prides itself on being one of the most effective democratically governed counties. The idea of the American dream is that all people have equivalent political freedoms and a responsive government. However the effectiveness of social equality is being threatened by increasing inequality in the United States. Economic inequality in the US has expanded drastically. The wealth gap has had drastic changes over the past 35 years.
The US has one of the highest levels of income inequality in the developed world, with the top 1% of the population holding over 40% of the nation's wealth. This has resulted in a shrinking middle class, with a growing number of Americans living in poverty. Additionally, the country's debt-to-GDP ratio has steadily
Wealth and Inequality in America Inequality The inequality in America has increased over time; the gap between the rich and the poor has become a problem that many Americans don’t see. Inequality is the extent of income which is distributed unequally among the citizenry. The inequality of the United has a large gap between the poor and the rich making it unfair to the population, the rich are becoming wealthier and the poor remain poor. The article “Of the 1%, By the 1%, For the 1%”, authored by Joseph E. Stiglitz describes that there is a 1 percent amount of American’s who are consuming about a quarter of the United States income in a year.
Introduction Sociology Bryan Turner Bryan Turner contributed a lot of time familiarising himself with Durkheim, Weber and Marx’s view on rights. In Turner’s opinion Durkheim’s view did not satisfy the rights of individuals and was based more on social cohesion, Weber’s view allowed one to see passed the rights of just the state and Marx’s view was based off of the economic system. Turner found that Marx’s views were too influenced; this is because Turner believed that human rights should not be viewed exclusively from an individualist. The criticism, from Turner, on Weber’s view was partial based on Strauss’ criticism that Weber attacked the idea of natural rights. The two concepts that Strauss’ believed were attacked were the “conventionalism”