ipl-logo

Thrasymachus Vs Socrates Research Paper

571 Words3 Pages

A54902473 In this paper I will reconstruct the reasoning of a conversation between Thrasymachus and Socrates. The discussion that they are having is on what is justice and what it means to be just. I will focus on the beginning of their conversation when Thrasymachus states his initial thesis to the point where Socrates finds a contradiction in that thesis. Thrasymachus’ initial thesis is “justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger” (Plato 14) and later clarifies it to be “justice is, the same in all cities, the advantage of the established rule” (15). By this, Thrasymachus is saying that it is just and right for those who have more power to do things that benefit them in a positive way. Rulers of a city ultimately have more power over the people and make laws that benefit their rule. They are kind to those who follow their laws and punish those who break the laws. …show more content…

The first two questions that Socrates asks is if it is just to obey the rulers and if the rulers can make mistakes. Thrasymachus says that it is just to follow them and that rulers can make mistakes. Socrates then continues to analyze the thesis, asking Thrasymachus if rulers can make incorrect laws since they can make mistakes. Thrasymachus agrees to this and with the next question agrees that a good law is one that benefits the rulers and bad if it does not benefit them. Socrates then asks one more question, asking if the people have to follow the laws that the rulers make. Thrasymachus agrees to this statement, allowing Socrates to see a contradiction in Thrasymachus

Show More
Related

Socrates Argument Of Tacit Agreement In The Crito

543 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates states that if one does not agree with the contract that you tacitly agreed to that one must either try and persuade the state to change or follow the rules that they have. Socrates tried to sway the court on his ruling and failed, he now feels obligated to follow through with the ruling and accept the punishment that he was given. He also realizes that if he did not like the rules and regulations of Athens that he had the choice to leave and reside in another city. Socrates knows that since he has lived in Athens for many years and benefited from the goods and services of Athens he feels obligated to give Athens his

Read More

Socrates Argue Of Justice In Plato's Republic

342 Words | 2 Pages

the Republic, Socrates argues that justice ought to be valued both for its own sake and for the sake of its consequences (358a1–3). His interlocutors Glaucon and Adeimantus have reported a number of arguments to the effect that the value of justice lies purely in the rewards and reputation that are the usual consequence of being seen to be just, and have asked Socrates to say what justice is and to show that justice is always intrinsically better than is acting contrary to justice when doing so would win you more non-moral goods. Glaucon presents these arguments as renewing Thrasymachus’ Book 1 position that justice is “another’s good” (358b–c, cf. 343c), which Thrasymachus had associated with the claim that the rulers in any constitution frame

Read More

Thrasymachus Definition Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

2106 Words | 9 Pages

Plato contests this view on justice because he believes doing harm to anyone would be an injustice. This theory leads to their conclusion the just man is one who is useful. Thrasymachus refers to justice in an egoistical manner, saying “justice is in the interest of the stronger” (The Republic, Book I). He believes injustice is virtuous and wise and justice is vice and ignorance, but Socrates disagrees with this statement as believes the opposing view. As a result of continual rebuttals against their arguments,

Read More

Argument Of Justice In Plato's Book 1 Of The Republic

732 Words | 3 Pages

Bothered by Socrates’ logic, Thrasymachus presents a revised version of his previous argument. Thrasymachus says that injustice is stronger than justice and that it most definitely results in a happier life. The example he uses (of a powerful dictator who is made happy through injustice is a reference to his earlier example that justice is used to the advantage of the stronger). Thrasymachus has not greatly changed the principle of his argument, just using alternate examples.

Read More

Thrasymachus View Of Justice Essay

538 Words | 3 Pages

In Book I of Plato’s Republic the famed philosopher Socrate debates with a trio of characters the very definition of justice and what it means to be just. The last to present his ideas of the three, Thrasymachus argues that justice is the interest of the strongest party, and that the weak can do right by serving the interest of said party. In essence, Thrasymachus proclaims that the lifestyle of the unjust is far more profitable than the lifestyle of the just, so long as one can get away with being unjust. In the reality painted by Thrasymachus, tyranny takes the place of democracy, as the individual who is not weak must see government as an obstacle to their rise to power and accumulation of wealth. The weak are then destined to be ruled over

Read More

What Is Thrasymachus View On Justice

239 Words | 1 Pages

• Thrasymachus claimed that justice is the interest of the stronger or rulers of society. Thrasymachus’ definitions of justice emphasizes the notion that moral values are not a part of the behavioral aspect of a person, but are socially formed and exercised which reflect the interests of ruling hierarchy. He quotes “in each city that is ruled tyrannically, democratically, or aristocratically, the ruling group is master, and each ruling group sets down laws for its own advantage.” Based on his hypothesis, it is presumably assumed that when those with power act in their own interest, they are exercising justice. However, Thrasymachus’ inconsistent stance on justice was confronted by Socrates when he questioned Thrasymachus if the rulers who

Read More

Socrates And Crito Argumentative Analysis

1382 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates believes that justice benefits the just, but also benefits the city (other people) too. He is faced with a seemingly simple choice, escape Athens or remain in prison and be sentenced to death. Socrates’ central argument against escaping his circumstances is twofold. First, Socrates argues that “one must never do wrong.” (49b)

Read More

Socrates Definitions Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

1169 Words | 5 Pages

Socrates say’s this cannot be true because most of the people in this world make mistakes in judging who the real friends are and who the enemies are. Thrasymachus’s impression of justice is that the stronger person decides what justice is. Thrasymachus definition of justice raises two questions which needed clarification. First question is what exactly

Read More

Obstacles Of Construing Justice In Plato's Republic

217 Words | 1 Pages

In Plato’s Republic, there are many different attempts of construing justice. A series of definitions that happen to contradict the beliefs of others sends one man on a quest to find the true meaning of a just person. In this work, there are many obstacles that take place before an accurate perception of justice is created. In the beginning of Plato’s dialogue the nature of the question is constructed and by the end of the ninth book the realization that personal justice and justice within a city happen to contrast in a way that allows Socrates to successfully complete his pursuit. In the Republic, Plato yearns to acquire the knowledge of what it means to be a just person.

Read More

Thrasymachus Ideas Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

763 Words | 4 Pages

In Plato’s The Republic” written in 380 BC, Plato introduces two characters Polemarchus and Thrasymachus who hold two separate opinions on Justice. They both are made to give their own opinions on Justice by Socrates. Both standpoints accurately represent Justice in sirtain situations. The word justice can be represented in many ways because it holds a broad meaning. They are covering two completely different aspects of Justice.

Read More

An Analysis Of Plato's The Republic

1177 Words | 5 Pages

Justice is not the conception of the strong, while the weak are ruled by unjust rulers how Thrasymachus thought. Instead the ruler, rules accordingly establishing just laws even if they seem unfair. Rulers are infallible, thus creating just laws because if a ruler were to make an unjust law for the strong that would place the weak at an advantage creating a flaw in the argument. The ruler would want to create laws that are filled wisdom so that nobody would want to choose the life where an unjust men would be more profitable than a just men. In addition, Socrates demonstrates that an unjust men will not be able to live a more virtuous lifestyle than a just men due to the lack of learning that the unjust men has no recollection of, thus the just men will not be able to get the better of another just men.

Read More

Thrasymachus Definition Of Justice Analysis

1470 Words | 6 Pages

One of the potentially faulty arguments Socrates uses to ponder Thrasymachus’ definition of justice involves considering injustice within a single person. In other words, this means thinking about conflict within an individual’s “soul”. In his treatment of Thrasymachus’ position that

Read More

Thucydides Vs Plato Essay

751 Words | 4 Pages

He believed that and act of friendliness was an act of weakness, and that those who preserved their liberty do so because they are strong. Thucydides did not believe in excellence and virtue, he was in contrast with Plato’s views; therefore, his ethical way of thinking was in accordance to that of the gods, “Our opinion of the gods and our knowledge of men lead us to conclude that it is general and necessary law of nature to rule wherever we can” () Anyhow, because of the constant danger that he had to endure during the war, his idea of the good human life was to survive by being able to control one’s mind in all circumstances, to protect oneself and loved ones, and to be generous with friends. However, to be as terrible as one could be against enemies. For him, making money, fame, and prestige was more important than the improvement of the soul. Thucydides justice depends on power; strong men will do what they have the power to do, and the weak will accept what they have to accept.

Read More

Thrasymachus Vs Plato Justice

224 Words | 1 Pages

Plato believes justice can be something external which reflects on a principle of good. He also believed that the ruling is a craft (Barney, 2004). However, Thrasymachus recognized it as nothing more than the advantage of the stronger. This simply means that anyone who is weak will not be carried on further. Plato believes that Thrasymachus cannot practice the craft because he is

Read More

Plato Socrates Social Justice

1467 Words | 6 Pages

In Plato’s Republic, Socrates and his peers attempt to define justice. Unlike the definitions that his peers give, Socrates is searching to define justice as a structure, not a set of behaviors. Socrates uses a tripartite city-soul analogy to define justice and show that it is found when there is harmony between the three parts of the city—guardians, auxiliaries, producers—mirrored to the three parts of the soul—reason, spirit, appetite. Although Socrates provides a well-structured account of justice in an attempt to demonstrate that there cannot be social justice—in the city—if people don’t first bring internal justice—in the soul—in themselves, he has a notable contradiction in his premises. In Socrates’ ideal city it is a necessary condition of an auxiliary acting in a just way that he must cause any producers who get out of hand, or

Read More

More about Thrasymachus Vs Socrates Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document