ipl-logo

Three Branches Of Government

1212 Words5 Pages

The founding fathers created 3 branches because they felt that if the government had too much power that they would become power hungry, so they separated powers to keep everything equal so power couldn't corrupt.It was the best way they thought to have equal power in government.There would be three groups of power to decide different things in government and no group would have more power than another group. When the founding fathers wrote The Constitution of the United States of America, times were different and they knew things would change, so they wrote the document very fluently, allowing for changes to be made. Such as the fact that when they said all men are created equal, they were more likely than not, talking about all rich …show more content…

The framers of the Constitution did not wish to return to the totalitarian system of governance imposed on colonial America by the British government. To ensure that no single person or entity had a monopoly on power, the Founding Fathers designed and instituted a system of checks and balances. The president's power is checked by the Congress, which can refuse to confirm his appointees, for example, and has the power to impeach or remove, a president. Congress may pass laws, but the president has the power to veto them. And the Supreme Court can rule on the constitutionality of a law, but Congress, with approval from two-thirds of the states, may amend the Constitution …show more content…

This system was built so that no one branch of our government could become too powerful. Each branch is restrained by the other two in several ways. For example, the president may veto a law passed by Congress. Congress can override that veto with a vote of two-thirds of both houses. Another example is that the Supreme Court may check Congress by declaring a law unconstitutional. The power is balanced by the fact that members of the Supreme Court are appointed by the president. Those appointments have to be approved by Congress. As we have already seen our Constitution is very much a reaction to the events that came before it. Our founding fathers had several goals, foremost among those goals was to avoid tyranny. In order to do this several different systems were set up to prevent the abuse of power. Federalism was one of these systems. Federalism was designed to balance the power of the national and State governments and thus limit the powers of the national government. Jefferson and others were convinced that state government was closer to the people and thus more democratic.Another system that was developed was the system of checks and balances. Checks and balances, or the separation of powers, is based upon the philosophy of Baron de Montesquieu. In this system the government was to be divided into three branches of government, each branch having

Show More
Related
647 Words | 3 Pages

One of the ways that the United States guarded against cruel and oppressive government or rule was that they made the three branches of government. These three branches were the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, and the Judicial Branch. This helped guard against cruel and oppressive government or rule because “they were separate and distinct powers.” (Doc B) This would help to guard against cruel and oppressive government or rule because all of these powers were separated so there wasn’t one overpowering government.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism helped the Constitution guard against tyranny by specifying which powers belong to the Federal government and which ones belong to the State government. This separation leads to a double security so that the state government can watch the federal government and the federal can watch the state. James Madison states in his Federalist Papers #51(Document A), “power surrendered by the people is first divided between two

Read More
1554 Words | 7 Pages

In a perfect world the three branches would work seamlessly, as the writers of the Constitution had intended, but with over 430 members of the House of Representatives, 100 members of the Senate, and nine justices serving on the Supreme Court begs for convolution and, at sometimes, chaos. After the law has been proposed, carried out, and evaluated the President has the option to pass or veto the law. One would think that because the head of the American government, elected by the people, has made the order, the process would stop there. But because of the Constitution, Congress, really having all the power, are able to take Presidential veto and overturn

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

“The constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check in the other.” (Federalist Paper #51) (Doc C) The branches had some control of each other, so they can’t overpower each other. This helped balance the power so one branch doesn’t become an overpowered beast compared to the other branches.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

To paraphrase what James Madison said in Federalist Paper #47 , 1788 separation of powers is defined in the literal separation of the powers of the three branches of government consisting of the legislative, judicial and the executive branches. Separation of powers guards against tyranny because it does not allow a person or persons to he in more than one branch at the same time for example if someone is elected to be in the house of representatives than they cannot he elected for president at the same time so it stops someone for accumulation the powers or abilities of more than one government branch which guards against tyranny and keeps one from becoming a

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

It provides the overall structure of our democratic government. By separating powers into three branches and creating a system of checks and balances between the branches, it continues a long tradition in American

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

In document C there are the 3 branches of government and arrows pointing from one to the other telling us how each branch checks one another. Some of these are, the president can veto different laws if he does not like them, but Congress can override this veto and pass the law anyways if they have a majority vote to override it. The Courts can declare acts of either branch as unconstitutional. Congress can also impeach members of any other branch and can remove them from office. All of this means that whatever one branch does, it must go through the other two so no corrupt laws can be passed.

Read More
1151 Words | 5 Pages

Answer: The U.S. Constitution includes checks and balances between different branches of the federal government to ensure that a branch won't become too powerful and overuse its authority. One example of checks and balances between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches is the Presidential veto. The executive branch has the ability to veto legislation that is passed by the legislative branch. But the legislative branch can overlook a presidential veto if they decide to use a ⅔ majority vote in the H.O.R. and the senate. This makes sure that the legislative process cannot be abused by the

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

Three branches have the power to execute create and judge how long should be applied. However, the founders wanted to add something. They didn't want one branch to gain more power than the other so I created something called checks and balances. As the text, ¨Roman influence on American

Read More
162 Words | 1 Pages

The government created three branches of government, and they are the legislative, the judicial, and the executive branches. The delegates built the checks and balance system to keep the three branches in line. This checks and balances was built to make sure no one group became too powerful. An example is the president can veto any law, but congress can override the veto from the president. Congress only needs a

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

One significant influence was the concept of constitutional limitations on executive power. The experience of English monarchs abusing their authority reinforced the need for a system of checks and balances. Consequently, the US Constitution established three separate branches of government—the executive, legislative, and judicial—creating a system of checks and balances to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. The principle of representative democracy, as seen in the English Parliament, also shaped the formation of the US Constitution.

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

With the legislative branch having such a huge pool of representatives, and the executive having an extremely small pool of representatives, one could see if this procedure was not present, one branch could completely overrun the others. The executive branch may be called the commander in chief, but that does not mean they are above the law, and they must operate within their scope of authority. The “checks and Balances” system is not without criticism. Arguments that due to all the required process of making policy, it becomes too cumbersome and time consuming to be efficient.

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

The colonial government had similar 3 branches system as well. The Royal Government meant that royal colonies were ruled directly by the English. The Proprietary Government meant that proprietary colonies were established in territories and one person had the crown to govern the colony The Charter government were the self governed establishments. The founding fathers were the ones who formed the three branches of government that we know of today. The three branches were made so that not one person has too much control over the country.

Read More
938 Words | 4 Pages

The Three Branches of Government A well ran government is key in running great country. Citizens expect governments to be free, but just as well to give us guidelines in our country. America first truly started out with the constitution, which has been our guide on what the government and citizens are able to do, and entitled to.

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

James Madison wrote Federalist 51 over 200 years ago, yet its words still impact today’s government in 2016. When writing Federalist 51, Madison had two main objectives in mind; he wanted a government with a separation of powers, and he also wanted minorities to be protected. Both of his objectives have been accomplished and continue to be present in today’s American government with the latter objective being more present in today’s government even more so than in the past. To begin with, power is separated in today’s government, preventing a single person or group from having absolute power since, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” according to John Dalberg-Acton. The American government is composed of three branches which power is separated amongst.

Read More

More about Three Branches Of Government

Open Document