More handpicked essays just for you.
The flaws of the constitution
Federalism analysis paper
Relationship between the three branches of government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Answer: Massachusetts farmers opposed the Constitution in light of the fact that they felt it ensured exchange more than horticulture, the Federalist Papers were distributed there to pick up backing for it. Virginia and New York would not ratify until the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution. In light of the opposition, John Hancock at the Massachusetts ratifying tradition suggested that a bill of rights be included as the first gathering of amendments to the Constitution. Ratification in Massachusetts and pretty much all whatever remains of the uncommitted states relied on upon the comprehension that receiving a bill of rights would be the new government's first request of business. There were the opposition which was made out of assorted
1. What three branches were created by the Constitution? The three branches that were created by the Constitution are the Legislative Branch, Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch.
On September 17, 1787, The Philadelphia Convention emitted their own new constitution to the states for ratification. Instead, The Federalist profoundly accepted the Constitution for several reasons, which included that this new constitution allowed for higher and further central government, that was formerly undermined under the Articles of Confederation. In the other hand, The Anti-Federalist, did not want a authoritative and dominant central government, but instead, powerful state governments; in response to the new constitution, many of the Anti-Federalists began writing different essays and creating pamphlets as a means of arguing against it. In retaliation to the Anti-Federalists experiment at earning states to not rarify the Constitution, many federalists advanced a group of essays known as the Federalist Papers, which argued for the ratification of the new law system.
The document essentially split the nation into two camps. On one hand, there was a group who welcomed the document, seeing it as necessary for progress. On the other hand, there was a camp which opposed the document, arguing that it represented an unwelcome change. The fact that it ushered a new form of governance where authority would be shared between the federal government and state authorities is one of the factors that made the constitution a controversial document (U.S National Archives and Records Administration, n.d). There are those who felt that the constitution took away authority from the state governments and therefore robbed them of their autonomy.
The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who
Since they were all for the new constitution, they wanted to go ahead and make it. But the Anti-federalists didn’t want this. They were hesitant on this new government. So, that is why the Federalist papers were created. These were a series of 85 essays that tried to convince Anti-Federalists to ratify the Constitution.
Before the famous Constitution became published on September 17, 1787, there was a huge democracy over it since some people supported it (federalists), while others opposed it (anti-federalists). Basically the main arguments used by the Anti-Federalists in the discussion of the U.S. Constitution was the fact that the Constitution offered too much power to the federal government and that the rights of the people were not promised through a Bill of Rights. In order to get their words out, they had ratified convections for the thirteen states. They choose to go to Pennsylvania first because of its size, influence, and wealth.
After the Constitution was written by the Philadelphia Convention in 1787, all the individual states of America had to be convinced for its ratification. But, opponents, named "Anti-Federalists" opposed against the Constitution's ratification for multiple reasons: some thought that the Constitution would "take away the power from individual states", others desired "an even more centralized government with a single popularly elected government" and finally, some seeked for a Bill of Rights to "protect individuals liberties", in fear of undermining "the claims of slaveholders or other property owners". James Jay, Alexander Hamilton and James Madison therefore wrote the Federalist Papers, eighty-five anonymous essays , in order to reduce the fears of Anti-Federalists and promote the Constitution's ratification. These papers described the importance
As reported by many history books, the Constitution required the approval of 9 out of 13 states to win ratification. The Federalists where the group that favored ratification. Mostly the Federalist were wealthy people. Many Americans who were not wealthy supported the Constitution was because they believed that the United States needed a new and stronger national government.
America’s founding documents facilitated a system of shared power and alliances by dividing power into 3 separate branches. This not only prevents over power and or abuse of power, but allows for a steady, stable government with a precise outline that is assured upon every registered United States citizen. At one point America had no guidelines, or rule books. Until our country's founding fathers met and crafted a lengthy handbook on ways to live in order for each and every person to live a life consisting of liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as a constant drive for all people of America. To begin, Thomas Jefferson, one of our country's founding fathers, held a very strong opinion about the governance of America.
It could be argued that as the history of the United States has unfolded, the ratification of the Constitution was relatively successful. One might also argue that the Document Americans hold so sacred was ratified with the wrong intent in the first place. Nonetheless, the state representatives chosen to vote on the ratification had a substantial task in front of them. Had I been one of those representatives, I believe that I would have voted against the ratification of the Constitution due to the lack of rights left in the hands of individual states, the absence of term regulations for elected presidents, and the turn away from a truly republican governmental system. Based on the political climate of the late 1700s surrounding the state representatives
The American colonies were like England's babies. They were cared for and nurtured by the British. Like most teenagers, the American colonies wanted independence. In July of 1776, everything changed for the American colonies, gaining the independence they deserved. However, before the independence, the colonies had many governmental policies which helped shaped the colonies to become what it is known as today.
Although the three branches in U.S political setting are limited by each other, the president could also exercise executive orders as his privilege. The executive order is a proclamation released from the executive branch of government without involvement and oversight of the legislative or judicial branches. Since George Washington executed the power to respond to economic crises and natural disasters, every U.S president used executive order also. "The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States", "The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States" and "He shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed" enforced the confirmation of executive order’s evidence in the context that
Under the Constitution of the U. S. A. there are three distinct and separate branches of government. They are Executive, Legislative and Judicial. I cite this, because the criminal justice system gets it power and model from the constitution. The Legislature writes a law and enacts it, the executive branch has the power and duty to enforce the law and the Judicial reviews the law to ensure it is constitutional. That is the function of the Supreme Court, they are a group of Justices selected by the Executive branch (president) for a lifetime appointment, then reviewed and approved by the legislative branch or disapproved, and there are a total of 9 Justices including the Chief Justice.
Government is the body that regulates trade, laws, regulations and many other things. Government can be as big as the United States government or as small as the City of Madison's government. Many people wonder what the purpose of government is and how it works. Government is broken up into three different branches: executive, judicial, and legislative. The government is not perfect, but there are many things one can do as a citizen to help.
