ipl-logo

Three-Strike Policy Pros And Cons

458 Words2 Pages

According to our textbook, the three-strike policy is defined as “when people commit a third felony (a third “strike”), they are sentenced to life in prison” (280). The three-strike policy is only one example of how the legislators have tried to pass several laws which is basically meant to send more individuals to prison for longer sentences. The three-strike policy was passed and was put into effect. Many individuals believe that the three-strike policy is unethical and just plain cruel, while other individuals believe that the three-strike policy is a wonderful idea and that it would work out great. After the three-strike policy was passed, there was both positive and negative results from it. There has been a rise in juvenile crime since the three-strike policy was passed. Several states have incorporated blended sentencing into their court. By using the blended sentencing, juvenile offenders are given “a combination of adult and juvenile sanctions and is sometimes under the jurisdiction of the adult criminal court …show more content…

This all serves the “goals of punishment and retribution” (282). By doing this, there is a chance that many criminals will be stripped of their licenses, voting rights, and their eligibility for welfare and public housing. Many individuals believe that these federal and state legislators have taken it too far by making these additional punishments. However, I believe that there are certain things that should be taken away from the criminals. If you are fine with mentally/physically committing a crime, then you should have to get yourself out of the hole that you just dug for yourself. Yes, I believe that there should be some kind of rehabilitation provided for them, but I also believe that they should have to earn back the privileges that they once

Show More
Related
1029 Words | 5 Pages

I believe they need to be criminally punished for being the main reason that they served too many years of their 20s in prison. The innocence project was founded in 1992 by Barry C. Scheck and Peter J. Neufeld at Cardozo Law. Their primary purpose was to correct and prevent the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of innocent people. The innocence project has done a lot to fight the wrongfully imprisoned in America. As of July 2022, the

Read More
654 Words | 3 Pages

The three strike law aimed to convict career offenders by giving them a harsher verdict when the offender has been convicted of their third offenses. The goal of this law was to control career offenders by making them think twice about committing crimes because of the harsh punishment they would face if they were caught committing the third crime. Ever since the law has been passed it has been in the center of many controversies. Many argue that the law is unfair to the offenders and that it has a negative effect on society.

Read More
1154 Words | 5 Pages

They are not to be imprisoned or sentenced to death rather they must be treated mentally. The single mistake committed in the childhood should not reflect back to entire

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

California’s Three Strikes Law was implemented in order to improve public safety. The murders of Polly Klaas and Kimber Reynolds caused the citizens of California to request a reactive measure in order to improve California’s preventive safety measures. Polly Klaas and Kimber Reynolds were both murdered by repeat offenders. The murders resulted in a public outcry and a petition was started in order to improve the sentencing requirements for repeat offenders (Skelton, 1993). The Three Strikes Law became a source of controversy due to the fact that many people argued that the law was in violation of the Eighth Amendment, which states that, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments

Read More
349 Words | 2 Pages

In 1993, twenty three states and the federal government adopted some form of the three strike law intending to target repeat offenders. The State of Washington was the first to do so; the State of California soon followed with a considerably broader version of the law. Even though, adopted versions of the three strike law vary among the states, the laws generally reduced judicial discretion by mandating severe prison sentences for third (in some instances first and second) felony convictions. 1993 was unquestionably the peak of public concern about crime and the peak of the political response to that concern, resulting in what was a unique punitive period in American history. America’s incarceration rate increase more during the 1990s than

Read More
1209 Words | 5 Pages

Recently, the government has developed a tactic called the "three-strike rule. " This law was enacted in 1994 by Congress and the Clinton administration. The purpose of the law was to give longer sentences to those who were previously convicted of a violent or severe felony to prevent them from being released and doing a crime again. Due to this law being passed, many minorities stayed in prison for most of their lives. This caused the government and private companies to build more prisons and profit from them.

Read More
166 Words | 1 Pages

The maximum length is set by legislators and the judge imposes the length of the sentence up to the maximum. Mandatory sentences are set by legislators instead of judges. Mandatory sentences set a penalty for certain crimes that is the standard for all offenders convicted of that crime. I do not believe three-strike laws should be implemented across

Read More
1144 Words | 5 Pages

The idea behind this legislation was that they should get time reciprocal to the crime, adult time for adult crime, but

Read More
1071 Words | 5 Pages

Lastly, the three Strikes laws will impose life sentences on offenders whose crimes don't warrant such harsh punishment. Not all crimes are the same. A violent offense such as breaking someone’s nose, as opposed to rape should not be given the same sentence. Yes, violence is never the answer, but it is not the equivalent to rape. The punishment should fit the crime.

Read More
329 Words | 2 Pages

In the United States, habitual offender laws, are statutes enacted by state governments which mandates the courts to impose harsher sentences on those convicted of an offense if they have been previously convicted of two prior serious criminal offenses. What this means is that people that have been put in prison 3 times will get a harsher punishment going from whatever they 're consequence is to life in prison. I am against this law, for reasons I will talk about later. The origin of the three strikes law came from article 2 section 28 of the Montana constitution in 1998, which states the three strikes law.

Read More
1798 Words | 8 Pages

Defined as a public policy that imposes an outlined amount of prison time based on the crime committed and the defendant’s criminal history, these sentences dictate that a judge must enact a statutory fixed penalty on individuals convicted of certain crimes, regardless of extenuating circumstances. Such laws have removed discretionary sentencing power from judges, instead focusing on severe punishments in line with national drug and crime concerns. While the original goal of mandatory minimum sentences was to deter potential criminals, reduce drug use, control judicial prudence, the policy has had extreme consequences such as sentencing imbalances and

Read More
1679 Words | 7 Pages

In 2009, California was ordered by a federal court to reduce their overcrowded prison population by 138 percent. The state had a massive incarceration rate during the “tough on crime” era (Alternative to Incarceration in California, 2015). In 1994, California had enacted a Three Strike Law. This law allows for offenders who have been convicted of a serious felony to be sentence to a prison term twice as long if they had a prior conviction. If they had two or more prior convictions then they would be mandated to a sentence of 25 years to life (California Courts,

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

In other words, mandatory sentencing for repeating offenders that have not learned their lesson and also so they stop committing crimes in the street since they are imprisoned. What the law basically states is that if you are a felon that has two felonies in their record and gets charged with a third felony, you must received the maximum sentence for the type of felony. With this law follows a lot of controversy. Some people believe that it is too harsh and can ruin a person's life. Others believe it is well deserved as you get 3 chances to better yourself.

Read More
681 Words | 3 Pages

Criminals that have been convicted of murder, rape, child abuse, and other violent crimes due deserve some punishment. They get thrown in jail where they suffer boredom and other minor difficulties, but typically they do not suffer the way they made their victims suffer. Non-violent offenders, crimes like auto-theft or burglary, should not suffer beatings and other harmful things that other inmates might force upon them. They broke the law without hurting people physically, so they should have to suffer through assault in prison. No, inmates should not be harmed physically, emotionally, or physically, but it will happen in prison and when it happens it should be the violent contenders that are

Read More
1678 Words | 7 Pages

However, crimes are committed whilst in prison, such as drugs and assaults. Some critics say the ‘three strikes and you are out’ law where repeat offenders get a longer sentence are wrong, as the third strike could be a lesser crime such as public disorder. Nevertheless, if just incapacitation and no rehabilitation some critics say will be costlier to society as they will go out and reoffend and, they are not employed and pay taxes. Rehabilitation is also a punishment which should improve the offender's behaviour and stop them committing crimes. Advocates of rehabilitation state prison does not work; however, critics of rehabilitation state prison does work as the criminal cannot commit a crime against the public while incarcerated (Cavadino, 2007 p 36/56).

Read More

More about Three-Strike Policy Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document