ipl-logo

Three Strike Laws

1249 Words5 Pages

All across America, two and three strikes laws have been part of the Justice Department’s Strategy for Anti-Violence. These kinds of policies make a few requirements. One of the requirements is that if an individual has been found guilty of committing a felony that was violent, and also has two convictions on their record, they will serve a life sentence automatically. The two strike and three strike laws main focal point is to highly increase the punishments of the individuals that are convicted of more than two crimes that are considered serious. The purpose of this essay is to discuss two strike and three strike laws, if these laws positively or negatively affects the society, and if whether or not these laws are fair.
Two and Three Strikes …show more content…

If there is a firearm involved in a crime, agencies refer to the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), to achieve the prolonged incarceration of armed, violent offenders. Under this Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, it gives the agencies power and authority to emphasize the "Three Strikes, You're Out" requirement. This assist agencies with offenders that are violent and repetitive. This requirement plays an important role in every agency’s strategy for anti-violent crime. (Harris, n.d.). There have been a few benefits and positive outcomes for implementing the three strikes law. These benefits include, but are not limited to: 1) justice being served for the victims of the crimes and it also removes the criminals not only from the streets, but from the community as well, 2) criminals are deterred because once they have three strikes, they have no more chances, and 3) criminals would retire, flee the state, and even change their whole behavior and ways of thinking (Harris, n.d.). Research has found that before there was a “three strikes law” there were set recommendations for the third time offender. For example, child molestation in the first degree that also had two prior sex offense would receive approximately nine years and six months for their sentence. Another example is …show more content…

These types of policies have quite a few requirements. One of the requirements is that if an individual is found guilty of committing a felony and that act was also violent, and they have two convictions on their record, that individual will serve a life sentence automatically. The two strike and three strike laws main objective is to vastly increase the punishments of the individuals that are convicted of more than two crimes which have been considered serious. The purpose of this essay was to discuss two strike and three strike laws, if these laws positively or negatively affect the society, and if whether or not these laws were

Show More
Related

Casey Anthony Case Analysis

1346 Words | 6 Pages

Florida courts are plagued with too many people appointed or elected who are entrusted with the sole responsibilities of doing out justice in their public official capacity, who often times suffer from the common syndrome of lacking the ability to separate the administration of justice from the imbuing of their very own interest and passion. Court Judges, prosecutors, and even law enforcement officers very often cannot resist the urge to impart their very own passions and interest into the administration of justice. Far too often an individual’s social, background, and even financial status plays a significant role into the courts official’s decisions and administration of justice. The decision to impose a stiff penalty as oppose to showing

Read More

Summary Of The Sentencing Reform Act Of 1984

461 Words | 2 Pages

“The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984” The article, “The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984” (2015), written by Eric Girault, persuades the audience that the enactment of the law did not reduce crime in societies, but was misappropriated, which caused a negative impact on families and their communities. Girault describes this by sharing his personal anecdote on receiving a harsh prison sentence for a non-violent crime as a first time offender. He uses trustworthy resources in order to substantiate his claim. Girault’s intended audience for this piece of writing is the general public, specifically those that lack knowledge of the law and its due process.

Read More

Three Strikes Law Research Paper

863 Words | 4 Pages

California’s Three Strikes Law was implemented in order to improve public safety. The murders of Polly Klaas and Kimber Reynolds caused the citizens of California to request a reactive measure in order to improve California’s preventive safety measures. Polly Klaas and Kimber Reynolds were both murdered by repeat offenders. The murders resulted in a public outcry and a petition was started in order to improve the sentencing requirements for repeat offenders (Skelton, 1993). The Three Strikes Law became a source of controversy due to the fact that many people argued that the law was in violation of the Eighth Amendment, which states that, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments

Read More

Strikes Law In 1993

349 Words | 2 Pages

In 1993, twenty three states and the federal government adopted some form of the three strike law intending to target repeat offenders. The State of Washington was the first to do so; the State of California soon followed with a considerably broader version of the law. Even though, adopted versions of the three strike law vary among the states, the laws generally reduced judicial discretion by mandating severe prison sentences for third (in some instances first and second) felony convictions. 1993 was unquestionably the peak of public concern about crime and the peak of the political response to that concern, resulting in what was a unique punitive period in American history. America’s incarceration rate increase more during the 1990s than

Read More

13th Amendmentamendment Essay

1209 Words | 5 Pages

Recently, the government has developed a tactic called the "three-strike rule. " This law was enacted in 1994 by Congress and the Clinton administration. The purpose of the law was to give longer sentences to those who were previously convicted of a violent or severe felony to prevent them from being released and doing a crime again. Due to this law being passed, many minorities stayed in prison for most of their lives. This caused the government and private companies to build more prisons and profit from them.

Read More

Three-Strike Policy Pros And Cons

458 Words | 2 Pages

According to our textbook, the three-strike policy is defined as “when people commit a third felony (a third “strike”), they are sentenced to life in prison” (280). The three-strike policy is only one example of how the legislators have tried to pass several laws which is basically meant to send more individuals to prison for longer sentences. The three-strike policy was passed and was put into effect. Many individuals believe that the three-strike policy is unethical and just plain cruel, while other individuals believe that the three-strike policy is a wonderful idea and that it would work out great.

Read More

Indeterminate Sentencing Vs Incarceration

166 Words | 1 Pages

The maximum length is set by legislators and the judge imposes the length of the sentence up to the maximum. Mandatory sentences are set by legislators instead of judges. Mandatory sentences set a penalty for certain crimes that is the standard for all offenders convicted of that crime. I do not believe three-strike laws should be implemented across

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Crime Bill Of 1994

875 Words | 4 Pages

This exemplifies the government's recognition of the importance of targeting organized crime groups for deterrence and prosecution. Expansion of Death Penalty: The Crime Bill expanded the federal death penalty to include a wider range of offenses, such as certain drug-related crimes and homicide. This demonstrates the government's efforts to address violent crime and deter offenders through harsher penalties. In conclusion, the 1994 Crime Bill introduced measures to reduce crime and improve public safety in the US, including the "three-strikes" provision, gang-related penalties, and federal death penalty expansion.

Read More

The New Jim Crow: A Case Study

515 Words | 3 Pages

(Michelle Alexander, 2010:58) The three strikes law targeted the communities affluent with minority groups. At the turn of the 21st century the majority that entered the prison system were African Americans and Latinos. (Michelle Alexander, 2010) The reason behind mass incarceration was due to the crack down on the deteriorating communities where the majority of minorities lived. Authors Scott Ehlers, Vincent Schiraldi and Jason Ziedenberg of Still Striking Out: Ten Years of California’s Three Strikes (2004) report that African Americans in prison because of the three strike law is higher per every 100,000 African American than Whites and Latinos in California. (U.S. Census Bureau

Read More

Three Strikes Laws: Habitual Offenders

730 Words | 3 Pages

He would steal to get the money for his drug habit. Mr. Anderson’s third strike was for purse snatching. Because of his two previous convictions, Mr. Anderson was sentenced under the Third Strike law to send a minimum of 25 years in prison. He served 12 years of that sentence (The Return,

Read More

The Three Strikes Law

329 Words | 2 Pages

In the United States, habitual offender laws, are statutes enacted by state governments which mandates the courts to impose harsher sentences on those convicted of an offense if they have been previously convicted of two prior serious criminal offenses. What this means is that people that have been put in prison 3 times will get a harsher punishment going from whatever they 're consequence is to life in prison. I am against this law, for reasons I will talk about later. The origin of the three strikes law came from article 2 section 28 of the Montana constitution in 1998, which states the three strikes law.

Read More

Essay On Mandatory Minimum Sentencing

1798 Words | 8 Pages

Defined as a public policy that imposes an outlined amount of prison time based on the crime committed and the defendant’s criminal history, these sentences dictate that a judge must enact a statutory fixed penalty on individuals convicted of certain crimes, regardless of extenuating circumstances. Such laws have removed discretionary sentencing power from judges, instead focusing on severe punishments in line with national drug and crime concerns. While the original goal of mandatory minimum sentences was to deter potential criminals, reduce drug use, control judicial prudence, the policy has had extreme consequences such as sentencing imbalances and

Read More

Annotated Bibliography On Death Penalty

1145 Words | 5 Pages

Deterrence and the Death Penalty: The Views of the Experts. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 87(1), 1. doi:10.2307/1143970 This article was written by Michael L. Radelet and Ronald L. Akers. They both consulted experts on criminology and criminal behaviour to evaluate the effectiveness of the Death Penalty.

Read More

Arguments Against The Three Strike Laws

564 Words | 3 Pages

In today’s society people are going to jail for committing minor felonies such as possession of a small amount of drugs, shoplifting a two dollar pair of socks, breaking into a soup kitchen for food, writing a bad check for $146, and stealing a slice of pepperoni pizza. Why are these people going to jail for these minor felonies you might ask? The answer is simple; it’s due to the “Three Strike Laws.” You might be asking yourself what are Three Strike Laws, in Criminal Justice the Three Strike Laws are defined as laws enacted by state governments which mandate courts to impose harsher sentences on those convicted of an offense if they have been previously convicted of two prior serious criminal offenses.

Read More

Essay On Concealed Guns Should Be Banned

590 Words | 3 Pages

A possible concern is threatening weapons that are used too often when a person is causing a crime. For example, crimes all over the world have steered to atrocious incidents caused by concealed guns. This implies that the use of guns is taken for granted all over the world. This means that concealed guns have been the cause of a numerous amount dangers popping up around the world. However, “Carrying a concealed handgun could help stop a public shooting spree.”

Read More

More about Three Strike Laws

Related Topics

Open Document