To Kill A Mockingbird And Julius Caesar Analysis

821 Words4 Pages

Many think that following the crowd is the way to go, saying that the crowd appears for a reason. Though rarely does this result in following personal moral values. Mark Twain states that, “Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority it’s time to pause and reflect”. In the texts of To Kill a Mocking bird and Julius Caesar majorities did not take the time to reflect on their actions and acted on ever so changing emotions. The plebeians are blinded by anger against the conspirators causing chaos to Rome letting their anger get the best of them. The Maycomb jury persecutes Tom Robinson a coloured man based on a ludicrous hatred for him. The idea of stopping and thinking about the circumstances of the situation is obsolete. It is evident that in the literatures of To Kill a Mockingbird and Julius Caesar that majorities in there given situations acted on envy and hatred rather pausing to gather their thoughts. In some cases anger is a source of energy, a source of power in essence. Though as a downside, …show more content…

All human beings are born different from each other and likewise, can act different from one another. It is through pausing and reflecting that one finds freedom. When straying away from a crowds ideals, more balanced decision making can be made. Analyse of a situation must be done by the individual and not the group to ensure that a person’s moral values trump any opposing group values. Hence, the number of people that may agree is completely irrelevant. It is in the texts of Julius Caesar and To Kill a Mockingbird, one finds Brutus and Atticus taking the time to realize their moral values. Both characters have a clear idea of what they end up supporting, the greater good. Like them, Humanity must be able to make decisions being completely sure about what they support. Only then will personal opinion have a place in today’s