ipl-logo

To What Extent Should Governments Be Allowed To Monitor Citizens

1207 Words5 Pages

"To what extent should governments be allowed to monitor their citizens in the name of protecting the general public, and through what measures? Do domestic surveillance programs such as screenings at the airport, CCTV cameras, and domestic drones actually keep us safer?"
The government should be able to monitor us as citizens to protect us not only from terrorist and foreign harm, but also to protect us from ourselves. We have more problems with domestic violence and crimes that can be prevented by video surveillance.
The FBI does so by keeping all of the domestic wiretapping and monitoring secret and private so that there's not mass chaos over privacy issues. Every once in a while we get glimpses on how far the extent of the public and domestic camera control and audiovisual …show more content…

The crime rate will go way down, because citizens are being held accountable for their actions. People will be a lot safer and are much safer due to the airport screenings. Drones can sweep over an area and check on everything, which can prevent crime, but also can check for house fires and public disturbances. For example, if a lady falls into her pool and can't swim, and she lives home alone, someone can notify the public ambulance services, and she might be able to be saved and\or pulled out of the pool.
The cons that could occur: A public official could be twisted or corrupt and use the cameras for bad purposes such as: stalking a child or a woman for horrible intentions. Letting crimes that are very bad happen to other people and won't call it in, try to stop the crime or at least report it. Good people would run out of money because of the overproduction of traffic violations and some of the violations could have been prevented by better surveillance. People's private information or addresses being televised or given to media by

Show More
Related
565 Words | 3 Pages

This PowerPoint is used to explain the two sides of this debatable topic, but putting more focus on one of them. Personally, I think that surveillance can be beneficial to the country, and this can be addressed in three ways: ethos, logos, and pathos. Ethos is believing in the claim because there is a person of power, or a recognized face advertising it. I used George Bush in this

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

The U.S follows a different school of surveillance. Despite the fundamental right to be held “innocent until proven guilty”, it monitors everyone until proven innocent. The status quo could of course damage America’s long known liberties granted by the Constitution. Recent revelations by whistleblower Edward Snowden, have confirmed that the government is more likely to cross some constitutional lines in the name of national security. “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) regulates the government’s acquisition of any electronic surveillance within the country for foreign intelligence use.

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

2. Another good thing about it is that police officers or the aggressor can be held accountable for their actions. Continuously wearing body cameras would hold police accountable for their appropriate, and inappropriate, conduct (Baum, E.,2015). 3. The cons about body cameras are privacy issues and limitations.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Since September 11th, fear connected with national security threats has shifted to fear of the federal government. The U.S.A. Patriot Act certainly caused much anxiety amongst society. Signed by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001, this act increased law enforcement’s surveillance and investigative powers, “The purpose of the USA PATRIOT Act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and other purposes.” Clearly, federal agents have abused their power, as personal information, telephone calls, and Internet searches were and are being recorded and saved. A recent news article, posted in The Guardian, fully elucidates the intrusive government spying of American citizens, “the watchlist tracks ‘known’ and ‘suspected’ terrorists and includes both foreigners and Americans.

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

By using strong supporting arguments In the essay entitled, Everyone is Watching You, by Nadine Strossen. Strossen’s goal in the essay is to influence her readers that surveillance cameras do more damage than good, and that something needs to be done to eliminate them. Her controversy on this matter was very vigorous, Strossen convincingly argues that surveillance cameras are an atrocious idea and needs to be stopped. She does a satisfying job of catering to her viewers in her essay. With a topic that pertains to everybody, she takes the opportunity to use this to her convenience.

Read More
1012 Words | 5 Pages

Having body cams on police officers can help change the society we live in today that is dealing with police shootings. To start, there are many pros to having body cameras on police officers around the country. The cameras will prevent any unnecessary shootings and deaths of innocent people. In the past few years, Using the body cams can help prevent police violence against

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

There are many constitutional implications of government spying programs, one of those being a complete violation of privacy here in the United States. Snowden himself exposed the NSA, as he noted that calls were recorded and various other electronic data were collected on many individuals and kept for future use. There is no denying that the use of spying programs violates an American’s 4th amendment and it often leads to people refraining from posting something controversial due to the fear of being watched. Ever since the WikiLeaks documents were publicized, many people feel paranoid, and rightly so. People used to be able to talk, post and do anything they wanted to with complete freedom.

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

By being conscious of their every move being watched, officers will be careful not to make any obscene choices when on duty. The cameras will be beneficial to both the officers, and the public as they take careful measures to make good

Read More
1907 Words | 8 Pages

Another and probably one of the greatest advantages of the cameras is that they show what the officers see. Seeing what the officer sees will allow people to see into an officer's daily life. Many people do not know what a police officer deals with on a day to day basis. Some people even act like there is no bad in this world.

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

It is very important to use surveillance, but if you use it unjustly it can give more power to public order than individual rights. It causes a similar problem as the ones mentioned before, that it can prove challenging to identify if you had a good reason to use surveillance. You might not always know if you have a good enough reason to use surveillance, but you should exercise your best judgement to decide whether or not to use

Read More
193 Words | 1 Pages

The story “To Kill A Mockingbird”, by Harper Lee, starts off as the narrator Jean Louse Finch (Scout), tells the tale of her brother breaking his arm. She then continues on to her family history and how down the line after Simon Finch left England to avoid religious persecution, he bought slaves in America and built Finch’s Landing, a plantation in Alabama. The property was passed from each generations’ son to the next until it reached Scout’s father, Atticus. As Scout tells the story of Simon Finch, she discreetly implements a few of the story’s themes; the evil men commit, hypocrisy, and racism.

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

Surveillance is becoming increasingly integrated into human lives. Seemingly inconsequential minutiae like how long one spends in line at a grocery store or how many times a headline is clicked on a social media site are collected automatically by both public and private institutions. Whatever we do and wherever we go, there is likely some trace of it. This has led to great debates about the right to privacy, how much surveillance is too much, and under what circumstances surveillance is justifiable. Film and Television play important roles in these debates and in the way in which the public conceptualizes the utility and threat of surveillance more generally.

Read More
1100 Words | 5 Pages

The downsides are that they are not cheap to buy and the storage for the data that is recorded is filling up fast and there is a constant need for more storage. “The department has four of them, each costing about $350” “The recordings are deleted to make room for new videos” (Hall). On duty police should use the body cameras because there will be a better understanding of any events or incidents and less

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

The National Security Agency (NSA) is an intelligence organization that is part of the United States Government. Their responsibility is to protect citizens from foreign and internal dangers. This is done through surveillance cameras, phone tracking, and computer programs so, where exactly is the line drawn from being safe to invasive? Although, surveillance may now just be a social expectation among the world. The United States has been known for spying on its allies just as other countries have been known for spying on the United States and their own country 's allies.

Read More
1315 Words | 6 Pages

(Bilton, 2013) Surveillance of search engines permits information to be monitored so that if any hazardous search word like how to make bomb is looked it up several times by someone then it can be identified (Anon, 2014). Also, watching over the public assists police to capture crime suspects so that government organizations can protect national security (mass surveillance 위키피디아) To be specific, after terrible incident occurred in September 11, 2001, government of United States enacted the Patriot Act which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001. The act was signed by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001 in the name of declaring war with terrorism. (위키피디아) The law grants the right to Federal Bureau of Investigation to profile people who fit certain stereotypes so that potential crime and potential terror can be prevented.

Read More

More about To What Extent Should Governments Be Allowed To Monitor Citizens

Related Topics

Open Document